More from the LA Times poll. SWEET!

[MoonRiver]

If this poll means anything, Congress is ours!

"If the November 2004 general election for Congress were being held today, which party would you like to see win in your congressional district: the Democratic Party or the Republican Party?"

35% Repubs
54% DEMS!!

http://www.pollingreport.com/cong2004.htm

[spooky3]

1. Thanks!

[leyton]

2. We have lots of good chances here.

Plenty of Republican incumbents are retiring, leaving plenty of opportunity for the dozen or so pickups we need.

[AP]

3. Congress is so gerrymandered, the only think this number will prove is

how undemocratic our House of Representatives is.

House Districts are carefully carved out to protect incumbants. I think I read that there are as few as 30 really competitive districts left in America.

[ArkDem]

4. Hope they are more accurate than they were on the

California recall.

[TexasSissy]

5. Whoa! That's great news!

[Zynx]

6. It could be a 1994 in terms of a Congressional change.

[papau]

7. LA Times email to ABC states why GOP is wrong to question results

Los Angeles Times polling director Susan Pinkus sent ABC a email response to GOPer Dowd's comments about LA Poll that ABC quoted testerday:

"After reading Matthew Dowd's assessment of the Los Angeles Times Poll in ABC News' The Note, I feel that I have to respond to his assertion that the poll is a 'mess.' His negative spin of this poll is, quite truthfully, not unexpected. The Times makes every effort to use sound methodological techniques that are used by most reputable research and polling organizations. The questionnaire and methodology is available for anyone to see and conforms to the guidelines set forth by the National Council on Public Polls and the American Association for Public Opinion Research. Although Dowd does not like the results of the Times poll, I stand behind the poll's results and the sound statistical methods used.
"If Dowd doesn't like the Times results, did he have a problem with the latest Gallup and CBS/New York Times polls? The horserace numbers are similar to the results of these two latest polls. Gallup had Kerry ahead by 5 points in the two-way race and CBS had Kerry up by 8 points.
"The Times does RDD (random digit dialing) sampling which reaches households with listed and unlisted telephone numbers. The poll weights slightly (for minor corrections) based on census data for sex, race, age and education and does not weight for party ID. Party ID is a moving variable that changes from one election to another, and weighting by party registration makes no sense nationally because many states don't have their voters register by party and some states don't have voters register to vote until the day of the election.
"Here is the breakdown of party affiliation in Times polls going back to September 2001:
DATE N/WAY DEM IND REP S/ELSE D/KNOW
06/04 4 38 24 25 7 2
03/04 4 33 26 25 10 2
11/03 5 31 25 26 12 3
04/03 3 38 19 26 10 4
02/03 4 28 30 26 10 4
12/02 4 33 28 27 9 2
08/02 3 35 26 28 8 3
02/02 6 31 26 27 11 2
11/01 5 34 28 25 10 4
09/01 5 38 20 26 8 3
"As you can see, the numbers are pretty similar to one another (all within the margins of error).
"It is also interesting to me that if the poll is 'a mess,' why is he reporting data from the poll -- results that hopefully make his point? Why doesn't he report that the job approval ratings are very similar to those that other polling firms are finding? For example, a new Fox poll released today shows Bush's job approval 48 percent to 45 percent disapproval. Annenberg's numbers show Bush's approval to disapproval ratings at 48 percent to 49 percent. The Times poll has Bush's positive to negative ratings 51 percent to 47 percent. Annenberg also had Bush handling the situation in Iraq at 40 percent approve and 56 percent disapprove; the Times poll shows 44 percent and 55 percent. Annenberg has Bush handling the nation's economy at 41 percent to 55 percent; the Times had 43 percent to 54 percent.
"However, if you look at all the questions, not just the horserace there is uneasiness about what is happening to the country (56 percent think the country would be better off if it moved in a new direction, 58 percent think the country is seriously off on the wrong track -- which most polls are showing) and doubts about President Bush's presidency. On the other hand, Kerry needs to do better than he is about what his proposals are. Which will win stability or change -- we'll know on Nov. 2."
Susan Pinkus
Director, Los Angeles Times Poll

[Beetwasher]

8. Encouraging but National Numbers Have Little Relevance

Congressional races all come down to the specific districts and regions. We have a shot, but it won't be easy...