yes, in an op-ed in the WSJ - for all the Obama supporters who would not consider a news story - not an editorial or an op-ed - coming from the WSJ
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=5412918The op-ed is by Michael Zeldin, who is a part-time volunteer for the Obama campaign in the primary cycle.
(snip)
At the debates, Mr. Gore misspoke when he said that he traveled with Mr. James Lee Witt of Federal Emergency Management Agency to visit Texas after the Parker County fires broke out. (He traveled with Mr. Witt to other disaster sites.) Mr. Gore also implied during this same time period that he helped invent the Internet. (He meant only to say that he supported funding for the research that led to its development.)
As small as these errors were, at that moment everything changed. The Bush campaign and its allies systematically started calling Mr. Gore a serial exaggerator at best and, implicitly, a fabricator at worst. The media latched onto it, the label stuck and, thereafter, every word Mr. Gore uttered was scrutinized through the lens of whether he was telling the truth or exaggerating. The cartoonists outfitted him as Pinocchio, and he never could shake the characterization.
I believe that this negative branding, more than the hanging chads, led to his defeat. Four years later, John Kerry fell into the Swift Boat trap, was painted as a liar and a flip-flopper and too lost a campaign he might otherwise have won.
(snip)
t has been said that those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. There are warning signs that Democrats may be walking down that same path with Hillary Clinton.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120770047660999941.html?mod=todays_us_opinion