Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why I'm (and others are) SO angry: "Here We Go Again" by Jane Smiley

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 07:52 PM
Original message
Why I'm (and others are) SO angry: "Here We Go Again" by Jane Smiley
I just spent seven and a half years disagreeing with the administration that has given us an unprecedented military and economic mess. I saw it coming, it came, and in some ways it was worse, and promises to get worse, than I foresaw. I the course of these seven years, I have had my patriotism questioned and demeaned fairly often. I was even put in a book, as one of a hundred people who were hurting America.


So now, Barack Obama tells the truth about conditions as we know them--that the countryside and the small towns are dying in many places in our country, and that the corporatocracy doesn't care enough to do a thing about it. He points out that immigrant-baiting, gay-baiting, gun-baiting, and religious pandering have helped to destroy those towns and that countryside, that those being destroyed have been cynically enlisted by their very own destroyers to provide the votes that help accomplish the destruction. And this is what Senator Hillary Clinton says about it: "Senator Obama's remarks were elitist and out of touch. They are not reflective of the values and beliefs of Americans."


I cannot believe how angry this makes me. I cannot believe that after the last seven and a half years, I can even get this angry. Yes, I know she is pandering to her audience. Yes, I know she will do anything to get elected. Yes, I know that she and Bill Clinton are corrupt to the core, and that I should have never expected anything better of her. But, please, any of you angry white women who still support this craven shill, don't mention it to me. Do me the following favor -- apologize to your children for not stopping the war that HIllary voted for, the war that is going to impoverish them. Then apologize to them for the effects of global warming that are going to make their lives hell. Then apologize to them for the school shooting they may someday see, the one where the kid gets the guns out of his father's gun case, or buys at a gunshow. Apologize to them for the meaningless wars they are going to fight and pay for. Then tell them that "American values" killed their hopes and maybe killed them. And ask them if they think it's going to be worth it.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jane-smiley/here-we-go-again_1_b_96374.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Even Obama has indicated he chose his words poorly
Edited on Sat Apr-12-08 08:02 PM by OmahaBlueDog
"If I worded things in a way that made people offended, I deeply regret that," Obama said in an interview with the Winston-Salem (N.C.) Journal.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080412/ap_on_el_pr/obama_clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Doesn't matter what he says at this point. The cat's out of the bag.
And the angry people are coming out of the woodwork by the droves.

I suspect a good portion of them are registered voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Here's one right here...
..and I'm registered and I'm voting - OBAMA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Triana -- Should Edwards have hung in there?
I'm thinking a 3rd option might really appeal to voters right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. IMO he should have...but...
..it's not an option now. :(

Meanwhile, I'm so disgusted with Hill and McSame and their tactics. The latest flap ('bitter' and then Hillary's subsequent "Elitist" remark) just pushed me off the fence I'd been on since Edwards dropped out in January. So I've gone Obama. Now if Edwards was back...you KNOW he'd get my vote!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Gramma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Another here
Obama in November!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. this orchestrated 'outrage'..
has got to be the lamest shit I have ever seen. I think those "outraged" should go visit a VA hospital.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. So far the only person I've seen outraged is Clinton herself.
She's just throwing a solitary hissy fit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM7nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. People misunderstood what he said...
that is why he sort of apologized. Still, what he said is 100% true and I see it everyday. \
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. The only problem was with the word "cling"
It made it sound as though he was criticizing rural voters for what they care most deeply about

But if you read his words in context, what he was actually saying was something that might be rephrased as, "Some of these people gone for so long without hope of a better life for themselves or their children that they cling all the harder to what is still theirs -- their families, their churches, their traditional way of life. And they can easily be led to fear whatever might seem to threaten those things."

It also becomes clear in context that he was not describing all rural voters, but was simply explaining why some of them might be suspicious of his campaign and resistant to his messages of hope and change.

There is nothing wrong with any of that -- except for the single word "cling," which could admittedly sound like a put-down or even a threat, especially to people who have spent their entire lives being put down or threatened.

What's needed is better communication and more understanding on all sides -- both of which Hillary's gotcha politics does nothing to achieve.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Off To The Greatest Page !!! - K & R !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. Damn right!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blondiegrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. WOW! What a great rant. Go, Jane! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC