Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Standing by His Woman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 11:39 PM
Original message
Standing by His Woman
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/13/opinion/13dowd.html?ref=opinion

By MAUREEN DOWD

Hillary’s right.

The boys are holding her back.

And the worst part is, they’re her own boys.

Fresh from pushing the preposterous Mark Penn to the rear of her leaky boat, Hillary has to deal with Bill making waves again.

He spent the week taking the fun out of dysfunction, putting the “I” in id, and getting flaky just when Hillary has to be flawless.

In a mystifying burst of nuttiness, right in time for the Sunday talk shows, Bill twice dredged up Hillary’s rococo story about sniper fire in Bosnia.

He defended his wife on confusing her facts by confusing his facts — a disconcerting reminder about what climbing back on a presidency-built-for-two would be like.

“A lot of the way this whole campaign has been covered has amused me,” the unamused former president said Thursday night in Boonville, Ind.

He’s absolutely crazed, and not just because he feels that he never got the sort of incandescent press coverage that Obama gets — except maybe when he and Al Gore were on that bus, hailed as “Heartthrobs of the Heartland.” Bill is also crazed about the ineluctable fact that he isn’t Obama.

“He can’t compute that he’s not the new kid on the block,” said a former Clinton adviser. “It’s about his mortality — and immortality. He needs her to win because if she doesn’t become president, he goes down as a minor president. If she wins, it’s the Adamses and the Roosevelts and the Clintons.”

But he knows it’s going down the drain, and that Obama is the hot new thing and they’re the establishment retreads.

The 22nd Amendment — not to mention his dwindling political skills — prevents Bill from doing what he truly wants done: the demolition of the Obama phenomenon. Instead, he’s stuck propping up a candidate who is not a natural. (See the video of Hillary dancing at a seniors’ aerobics class at a Philly Y.M.C.A. Awk.)

Bill’s horse whisperer, Doug Sosnik, a former White House aide who was dispatched to keep him calm and play Hearts and Oh Hell with him, has been out of the country recently. His other personable aide, Matt McKenna, left to manage Hillary’s Montana campaign. The Big Dog was unguarded.

Hillary started telling her tall tale about Bosnia as early as January and continued until her Iraq speech on March 17 at George Washington University.

Bill mistakenly asserted that she had told the story only once, at 11 p.m. when she was tired, and “immediately” admitted her mistake.

“And, oh, they acted like she was practically Mata Hari, you know? Just making up all this stuff,” he said, adding: “And you would’ve thought, you know, that she’d robbed a bank the way they all carried on about this.”

Given her 3 a.m. ads — (that has got to be her hedge fund manager on the phone) — it was not very flattering for Bill to rant on and suggest that her 60-year-old brain was fuzzy.

In a characteristic bout of self-pity, he accused the press of “a double-standard about misstatements.”

Straining to recover on Friday and give the illusion that President Hillary would keep him reined in, Bill told the press: “Hillary called me and said, ‘You don’t remember this. You weren’t there. Let me handle it.’ I said, ‘Yes, ma’am.’ ”

Just as Mark Penn got Hillary into trouble with a conflict of interest on the Colombia free trade agreement, so did her husband.

“In the trade deal, your husband received $800,000 for four speaking engagements essentially for the trade deal or by a group that supports the trade deal,” a reporter said to Hillary in Pennsylvania. “You’ve given your money to your campaign. Is that a conflict of interest?”

Hillary responded with that mirthless don’t-go-there laugh. “I mean,” she said dismissively, “and how many angels dance on the head of a pin?”

But the dubious deals of her husband, a seven-diamond influence peddler, do provide an unsavory contrast with some of the candidate’s positions.

The larger point of last week’s imbroglio about Bosnia is that Hillary’s stretcher offers an interesting insight into her thinking. After the health care disaster, she retreated into traditional first lady duties, teas and hospital openings, traveling around the world on good-will missions.

The job of first lady could be amazing for someone who took advantage of its potential; Bono shows the good that fame, properly aimed, can do.

But after she got knocked back as co-president, Hillary felt trapped in the East Wing, ineffectual and marginalized, which is probably why she felt the need to retroactively add some heft to her travelogue in Bosnia and Ireland.

You can’t go from being a self-loathing first lady to self-aggrandizing about being first lady.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why does Dowd hate democrats? Is she a repug or something?
Just wondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I Like Her Even When She's Snarky About Obama...
She's witty and she doesn't buy into faux outrage or make shit up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dowd doesn't like Obama anymore.
Remember that before posting crap from her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. I bet Dowd is pissed she wrote this before the "Obama Is Elitist" crap broke.
cause that shit is right up her alley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. OK, I hate MoDo but...
calling the Bosnia story "rococo" is a stroke of genius.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. seeing how you just joined "TODAY", and have all of 2 posts...
I'm curious to know how you're an expert at what a "typical Obama response to Dowd columns" looks like? hhhhmmmmm.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Our excellent mods are catching on quicker & quicker these days.....
:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. That's simply NOT true
Two weeks ago she printed a strongly anti-Clinton post and I denounced her unambiguously; if you don't believe me, just look for it. And I denounced her again, in similar terms, when she wrote last Sunday's column disparaging Obama. I simply recognize a good turn of a phrase and I commented on it. A good turn of a phrase now and then doesn't make me despise her any less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I can only speak for myself
I have spoken out against her repeatedly. On the other hand, I think you're a typical troll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lena inRI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. Agreed 100% tishLA . . .
. . .her word choice is searing. . .jarring us with eureka visualizations. . .or as DUers say, she nailed it!

Maybe it's because I've read a lot of Voltaire, Twain, and Vidal, but I enjoy reading satirical op-eds by Dowd. . .it's mental gymnastics for me and, though I'm all for Obama, I don't mind her attacking him as well. . .makes us all real somehow.

And I know Obama would take her jabs all in stride. . .mentally counter-punching as H2O explained so well here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5466989


:toast: :toast: :toast: :toast: :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Wow! Thanks For That Link!
Edited on Sun Apr-13-08 12:42 AM by JimGinPA
Over 100 posts of intelligent conversation! I missed it somehow. I can't wait until we start having a lot more of that here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hysterical cackle to "mirthless don’t-go-there laugh"; that's right on.
Mirthless, yet she still does it. I think MoDo is spot on this week, but I am partisan. ;)

Here's another similar read, less the snark, from Eleanor Clift:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x352009

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC