Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Wins Nevada County Caucuses

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:38 AM
Original message
Hillary Wins Nevada County Caucuses
http://www.talkleft.com/story/2008/4/13/23150/8465

The Clark County democratic convention was held Saturday. It was a do-over from February. Hillary won and she now leads Obama statewide in delegates to the state convention.

More than 6,300 delegates participated Saturday, according to the Nevada Democratic Party. Clinton won 1,330 delegates from Clark County while Obama won 1,133 delegates.

Heading into Saturday, Obama had won the majority of the delegates in the state’s other 15 county conventions, 512 of 900. But Clinton’s win in Clark County, by far the state’s most populous county, gave her the lead statewide 1,718 to 1,645, for delegates to the May 17 state convention in Reno, where Nevada Democrats will select delegates to the national convention in Denver this August.

Nevada has 33 national delegates. As to why Hillary won in the January caucuses, here are the reasons:


MORE

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nevada is dead to me
Just kidding...caucuses suck...unless they are in Nevada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. I thought you Hillbots didn't recognize the results from Caucuses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. or the small state
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Still "bitter" from yesterday I see
Try to have some fun today. Take a good book to the park. Maybe "Lord of the Flies."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. I'm just happy that you now recognize the legitimacy of Caucuses......thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Unlike you, I don't generalize about supporters of either candidate
I realize you've got a bit of a handicap here, so I'll spell it out for you: I support Hillary and I don't question the legitimacy of caucuses.

I have said, repeatedly, before this cycle even started, that I think that caucuses are ridiculous and outdated and should be phased out.

But, while we still have them, the results are entirely legitimate.

Those are the rules we play by. And it remains so, until the system is revamped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. Caucuses don't count.
Oh, wait, I mean caucuses Obama won don't count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
17. still bitter I see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. From the hidden compound
comes a new Rovian style talking point? Sad, very very sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. I doubt it was a "do-over"; it's just the next step
No one will "win" until the state convention. It's how the caucus/convention system works. Actually the conventions are more important that the first tier of voting. The press doesn't understand that so they report wildly about the first voting. GOTV is as important at the step where National Delegates will be selected almost than at the first step.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Here's the link within the story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thanks but it's still not a do-over. It is truly the next step.
Edited on Sun Apr-13-08 08:58 AM by MaineDem
It appears even the CQ writer doesn't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I was wondering
about the "do over" part. It reads more as you say: just the next part of the process which ultimately leads to the state convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Wait...it might be.
Edited on Sun Apr-13-08 09:06 AM by MaineDem
Looks like the COunty COnventions were held in February - the second step after the caucuses. Why is this one being held now? Hmmmmm

Saturday 23 February 2008: County Conventions convene in each county. Each County Convention chooses delegates to the Nevada State Democratic Convention.

* These County Conventions choose the county's delegates to the Nevada State Democratic Convention. While a non-binding Presidential Preference Poll is conducted during the Conventions, delegates at the Precinct Caucus level are not bound to their declared Presidential preference.


Here's a link to the reasoning:
http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docid=news-000002701680

I still don't quite get it though. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. Here's the important paragraph I think

Last-minute get-out-the-vote efforts by both Obama and Clinton ahead of the original county conventions on Feb. 23 led to massive turnout in Clark County that overwhelmed the county Democratic Party’s organization for the convention. By noon, the interstate into Las Vegas was gridlocked and delegates and aspiring alternates were being turned away from the convention venue, Bally’s on the Vegas Strip. Both campaigns agreed that afternoon to shut down the convention and reschedule it for a later date.


So, in other words, this wasn't really a do-over. It had just been delayed and they finally held it yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. That makes much more sense
I couldn't imagine anyone doing it over. That just seems wrong on so many levels.

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
12. At most this might mean a swing of one delegate. She needs a lot more than that.
And to those who say that Obama can't win rural votes, Obama took 65% here in very rural Elko County. The enthusiasm for him around here was amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. That wouldn't be relevant in November
The cow counties simply don't have the numbers. It sounds like a cute idea, playing everywhere in the state, but the math is devastating. You're talking to acreage and not people. The percentage of Nevada rural voters who are potentially swayed in our direction doesn't justify the time/money expenditure.

Dina Titus after '06 bemoaned that she was told to prioritize the rural areas but it did her no good. She said if she could do it all over again she would try to squeeze every vote out of friendly Clark County.

Obama's problem is Clark County is poorly run from a Democratic perspective. We forfeit tens of thousands of votes since the participation doesn't match percentages in rural areas. I meet young blacks and Hispanics all the time in sportsbooks and elsewhere, and when I mention politics they may have opinions but invariably they are not registered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. It was the rural counties that put Bush over the top in Nevada in 2004.
Kerry took Clark County by a hefty margin but it wasn't quite enough to compensate for GOP strength in the rural areas.

If we can have a candidate who carries Clark County by the same margin as in 2004 but who can cut into GOP strength in the rural areas then that might be a winning combination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
15. Well since Nevada is mostly piglicons, is it any wonder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
16. And by less than she thought.
Interesting...when it was certified, HilLIARy's % went down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. a win is a win
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
18. and to the GREATEST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
19. congratulations Hillary--you go gal. ~YES WE WILL~~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
20. This reminds me
Edited on Sun Apr-13-08 10:21 AM by nichomachus
This whole "what the polls said today" and "who won the Ward 6 Caucus in Podunk" nonsense seems to be like trying to watch a tennis match from a bunch of snapshots -- presented to you out of order.

All very interesting, but essentially meaningless. And yet, people get breathless over reporting that Hillary beat Obama by 12 votes in Ward 6 and Obama beat Hillary by 8 votes in Ward 2.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
27. Huzzah for the Goddess of Peace!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC