jgraz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-13-08 11:44 AM
Original message |
|
Edited on Sun Apr-13-08 11:46 AM by jgraz
.
|
WillyT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-13-08 11:49 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Sun Apr-13-08 11:49 AM by WillyT
<snip>
The most familiar echo among many Pennsylvania women when they discuss Clinton, however, is disappointment. Ask them when they became disillusioned with the woman who would be president, and they can cite almost the exact moment.
For Clare Howard, a meditation teacher from Southhampton, it was the night in January when Bill Clinton suggested that Obama did well in the South Carolina primary because of his race.
That went too far, said Howard, 60. "It was like they would do anything to win," she said.
Joan Schmidt, 60, a school psychologist in Levittown, grew tired of hearing Clinton tout — and exaggerate — her experience.
Jane Dovel, 68, an artist in Doylestown, turned away from Clinton after hearing the New York senator's reaction to Obama's comments that Ronald Reagan had been a "transformative political figure."
Clinton fired back that Republicans hadn't had better ideas. "I don't think it's a better idea to privatize Social Security," she said. "I don't think it's a better idea to eliminate the minimum wage."
That's not what Obama had said, recalled Dovel. "What Clinton said was a blatant lie," she said. "From that moment on, she was history. She was not to be trusted."
Obama's increasing ability to convince these women that he's on their side has contributed to their shift away from Clinton.
<snip>
Same article.
:shrug:
|
Yael
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-13-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message |
2. You make a very good point |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:19 PM
Response to Original message |