Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Americans don't want Bill Clinton roaming the halls of the White House with nothing to do."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Nitrogenica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 05:57 PM
Original message
Poll question: "Americans don't want Bill Clinton roaming the halls of the White House with nothing to do."
Edited on Sun Apr-13-08 05:59 PM by jhuth
This is an attack we're going to face from Republicans over and over and over again if Hillary is our nominee.

As the disgusting witch Mary Matalin said on Meet the Press, "The crossovers do not want Bill, as Mitt Romney said, "roaming around in the White House with nothing to do." And it's evidenced by everything he said that he cannot do nothing. He's always the man in motion."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22976998/page/3/


Will Hillary Clinton be able to effectively counter this smear?

If you answer yes, I'd like to know your thoughts on the reason(s) why, as I do not believe she will effectively defend the smear.

I think she will run away from it, or try to distract from it.

Will Hillary Clinton effectively defend Bill Clinton's return to the Whitehouse?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. You can't run on 'changing the status quo' and have the last name Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. First of all, it's not a smear
Bill can't keep his nose out of things. In fact, if I were Hillary, I'd worry about him working on his own agenda behind the scenes -- can you say Colombia trade agreement?

If his performance on the campaign trail is any indication of his performance as first husband, we're in for another four years of a Clinton Three Ring Circus.

And Hillary would be well advised to make sure that all White House aides were elderly women or men. Put Bill in a building full of 20- and 30-something women and it's gonna be mayhem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's easy to defend, because it is what is called a "cheap shot."
Clinton is separated from his Monica mess by over a decade and major heart surgery. He's an older man, now. A big dog, but a slower one, too.

Run away? Distract? Hell no. Just say, in slightly more 'politic' tones, "What kind of pathetic, lame asshole flings shit like that?"

And McCain has a "ladies" problem himself--one that's quite recent and could be dragged up, if "they" want to play it that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. 8 years of peace and prosperity - give bill an important job and send him out nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. he'a a serial philanderer
and there are new rumors of bill affairs. of course his history and his new rumored affairs will be front and center if she's the nominee. It's delusional to think otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Sure, whatever you say. Rumors spread by rightwing sources are always so reliable. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. it has nothing to do with whether it's reliable
and who do you think we'll be fighting in the general, genius? The right wing, duh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Sure, whatever you say "genius." Guess you haven't noticed who the GOP has running, eh? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nitrogenica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. So you don't think the righties will play this card over and over and over again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. Absolutely not. Because what goes around, comes around. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nitrogenica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. I disagree. Let's touch base again in September and see who's right then.
"Because what goes around comes around" suggests the righties are afraid to attack us.

You think the Republican party is too afraid of Clinton to attack her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. You misapprehend what I was saying. I wasn't suggesting fear as a demotivator at all.
I was suggesting CERTAIN retribution.

They're not stupid.

Monica has been done to death. McCain with a hottie who looks freakishly like his wife, only a bit YOUNGER, is an interesting story. If we want to bring it up, that is...and just give us a reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nitrogenica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Well we're going to run the story on McCain weather they go after Bill or not.
I think the Republicans know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. I don't think so. Not unless provoked. We'll see. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:37 PM
Original message
YAY FOR RIGHT WING ATTACKS!
I'm really wondering if you were saying the same thing in 1998.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. I disagree McCain has no semen stained dress, or tape recorded phone calls, McCain can deny
Bill cannot.

If Bill had testicular cancer his health might quash those thoughts, heart surgery does not make him impotent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. McCain had a lobbyist pal that was "waved off" by staff. The NYT did a poor job of sourcing
their story, and overplayed it as a consequence. If those sources go public, McCain could have trouble.

Like I said, over a decade and major heart surgery separate Clinton from that unfortunate episode. Any attempt to go after him now would look like recycling, even if it isn't.

And Spitzer/Paterson/Mrs. Paterson, and McGreavey et. al., have rather taken the shock value out of that sort of reportage, anyway.

It's why no one is dogging McCain overmuch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'd rather have him roaming around with nothing to do
than to have any hand in the next administration.

He lost my trust a LONG time ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. would he leave the grounds to get his next hummers, or would
hillary have to go to Bosnia and other foreign countries while he did that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. His hummers have nothing to do with my distrust of him. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. its the chaos, the craziness, and I'd hate for Hillary to face more sniper fire
in Bosnia or other places too dangerous to send Bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. its not a smear - Bill's "job" tends to run against Hillary's claimed policies
we don't need him making money pushing more free trade deals or helping
Chinese internet companies round up Tibetan activists.

we don't need him trying to be president while she tries to fight the vast
right wing conspiracy again.

we don't need more of the chaos and madness and divisiveness that the
two of them bring to our govt.

she's part of the corporatists who will keep our wages down, export more jobs
to India (like she's doing for NY) and keep us from ever getting health care.

It would be like an insane asyllum to have both of them in the White House,
with Bill thinking he is running things, once Hillary would be "inaugurated".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. He wouldn't be doing nothing.
He'd be making trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galaxy21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Bill probably still has affairs even now
Edited on Sun Apr-13-08 06:24 PM by galaxy21
Him and Hillary are rumoured to only spend a few nights together a month, I find it hard to believe he's saint.

Of course it's a cheap shot, but there is a point there: if Hillary's the nominee, how will another bimbo erruption look? The republicans supposedly have 5 or 6 of bill's girlfreinds waiting in the wings to use against her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. Democratic Underground has lately become Free Republic II.
Are you proud of the role you are playing in that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nitrogenica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I think it is a legitimate question that we will all be talking about
Edited on Sun Apr-13-08 06:30 PM by jhuth
if she's our nominee.

The righties will use this, and as I've shown with my post, they have already.

Deal with the reality of that, or pretend they won't, it's your choice.

This has not been, as they say, "vetted".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galaxy21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Poor Bill...Gerald Ford thought he had a sex addiction and needed treatment
Let's face it, if this was Michelle Obama who was rumoured to have had various affairs, the Hillary supporters would be arguing its another issue for Barack's unelectability, but since it's Bill well 'that's bill, what can you do?'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
38. It depresses my regard for the forum, that's for sure. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nitrogenica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Sometimes reality sucks. I just know these attacks are coming, as will
the attacks on Obama.

Who has a better chance of surviving it all?

It's an important discussion for us to have, rather than the smaller picture "he-said she-said" attacks against our own, we should be preparing for what the republicans have in store for us after we decide our nominee.

The Republicans think Hillary is easier to beat than Obama. Have you ever wondered why?

Why has my brother, long time Republican, told me he voted for Hillary so he can vote against her in the fall?

Why did Rush push for the same thing?

Are we supposed to just ignore that?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. I've heard the same anecdotal logic about Obama. Vote for him to vote against him...
Many of Obama's victories were at caucuses, where organizing can trump popular support, especially when your support comes from old people who DO vote but don't caucus. And many of his victories were in historically red states.

I happen to think HRC is the stronger candidate. YMV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nitrogenica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. Wow, at caucuses. Say I've never heard that before.
Holy Cow!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
19. It's ridiculous how people claim Hillary is electable. She's not. That's why she lost already.
How are you going to win when half the country is dead set against you from the very beginning?

The thought of Bill and his philandering ways roaming loose in the White House turns off Republicans, Independents and Democrats. The man is a master politician, but he's also a complete sleazeball.

Thank God enough of this country has decided to move on. Bill wore out his welcome quite a while ago, and Hillary's become even more vile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Democrats have been more succesful at assassinating his character than the Republicans ever were.
His popularity rose despite Lewinsky and despite Gingritch and co.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. People, Democrats included, still think he was a good president. But he's not running.
He'll be wandering the halls of the White House with nothing to do. If the Presidency couldn't keep him busy last time, why do you think his pet projects will this time?

These two need to take their codependent freak show somewhere far away. It's a burden on the party and the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. You're a burden on the party and the country.
You need to take your show somewhere far away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. That's not all that nice. First, I don't have a show to take anywhere.
Edited on Sun Apr-13-08 07:03 PM by Walter Sobchak
Second, I'm not running for President. And I'm not intentionally trying to destroy the Democratic nominee like Ms. "I'm owed this goddammit!" is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nitrogenica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. I agree with you Walter. If we don't discuss this, we're gonna get blindsided
by it if Hillary's our nominee.

The big smears from the Republicans havn't even started yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. She won't be our nominee, so there's really no need to discuss it.
I just feel like discussing it because I'm sick of all the bullshit attacks on Obama from inside our own party.

I think Hillary's lost it. I'm not being facetious. I really think she cracked. I don't blame her for that, because she's had a tough, pressure-filled life living with Bill all these years. I just don't want to to see her play out her neurosis in front of the whole country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #33
42. Not good with subtlety I see.
Edited on Sun Apr-13-08 08:36 PM by aquarius dawning
"And I'm not intentionally trying to destroy the Democratic nominee like Ms. "I'm owed this goddammit!" is."
Lots of nomination fights go to the convention. It's not unusual. You and your fellow Obama supporters need to quit crying about it because it's obvious to everyone that you're just trying to suppress votes for Obama. If he can't take the heat, he needs to get out of the kitchen. period. And I think if Hillary thought something was owed to her, she wouldn't be fighting as hard as she's fighting and; furthermore, she's not fighting him nearly as hard as McCain and Co. will fight him should he win...in August.

edit: and what's more, if it's OK for ya'll to try to destroy Bill Clinton, it's within our right to try to destroy barack obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Yeah, but it's over for your candidate, and it has been for quite a while.
The Clintons' revolution is over, aquarius dawning. Condolences. The Clintons lost. My advice to them is to do what their parents did -- get a real job! The Clintons will always lose!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Did Obama finally break 2024 deleagtes? last I saw he only had 1,631.
Last I knew, he had a small lead handed to him by Red state caucus goers. Last I knew, he hadn't really won shit. I think we'll have to wait until August to know for sure who won what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
22. Bill was and remains enormously popular. Lots of Americans would love to have him back in the WH
and I'm sure Hillary will find things for him to do that don't involve pulling his pants down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
24. She doesn't need to defend it for three reasons
1. He was a good president whose administration did a great deal of good for the country. As she says, which part of the 90's didn't you like, the peace or the prosperity?


2. She is running her own show and she's shown that already. If she needs his advice, she'll take it.

3. Bill has his own projects he works on, has been all along.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galaxy21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. So, no Hillary supporter will say they don't expect a bimbo erpuption if Hillary's the nominee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
29. Hell NO..I don't want bil clinton
roamin' the halls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
32. I'd happily have him heading up the UN delegation or something similar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Penndems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
46. "The crossovers do not want Bill, as Mitt Romney said, "roaming around in the White House with
nothing to do."

Now I know why I stopped watching "Meet The Press".

Matlin, you are one stupid hussy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
47. Of course she can. Give him a job.
I can't think of a better qualified UN ambassador (for instance).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Personally, I'd be real fuckin' happy to have him roaming those halls again.
These so called DemocRATS who are portraying him as some kind of a sexual predator by using the language of Mitt Romney really ought to consider how Republican they really sound. As if Having Bill Clinton back in the white house would be bad thing for the Democratic party. Give me a break. This is just pathetic and disgusting and completely out of line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC