Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary's pathetic run: from denouncing hope to pouncing on bitter

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 01:33 PM
Original message
Hillary's pathetic run: from denouncing hope to pouncing on bitter
When Hillary was confident she would win she claimed: "It's not a very long run. It'll be over by Feb. 5.".

When it became obvious she couldn't win by conventional methods, she began harping on the "false hope that MI and FL woudl secure her victory."

Well, that was after her charge that Obama was raising "false hope" failed to gain traction:

"So, you know, I think it is clear that what we need is somebody who can deliver change. And we don't need to be raising the false hopes of our country about what can be delivered. The best way to know what change I will produce is to look at the changes that I've already made." -- Hillary Clinton


Imagine, Hillary telling Americans not to hope.

It's obvious the primary hasn't worked out as Hillary had hoped so she had to dig deep for a plan to try to sway the superdelegates.

This weekend, Hillary revealed her master plan: convince Americans that Obama is an elitist.

Primary math is not on her side, but Hillary's hope is that smearing Obama will magically help to end her downward spiral:





Hillary is full spin mode.

There's a slight problem, Americans have been in Bush hell for seven long year, and only 17% of us approve of the way things are going:





Robert Reich (h/t):

Sunday, April 13, 2008

Obama, Bitterness, Meet the Press, and the Old Politics

I was born in Scranton, Pennsylvania, 61 years ago. My father sold $1.98 cotton blouses to blue-collar women and women whose husbands worked in factories. Years later, I was secretary of labor of the United States, and I tried the best I could – which wasn’t nearly good enough – to help reverse one of the most troublesome trends America has faced: The stagnation of middle-class wages and the expansion of povety. Male hourly wages began to drop in the early 1970s, adjusted for inflation. The average man in his 30s is earning less than his father did thirty years ago. Yet America is far richer. Where did the money go? To the top.

Are Americans who have been left behind frustrated? Of course. And their frustrations, their anger and, yes, sometimes their bitterness, have been used since then -- by demagogues, by nationalists and xenophobes, by radical conservatives, by political nuts and fanatical fruitcakes – to blame immigrants and foreign traders, to blame blacks and the poor, to blame "liberal elites," to blame anyone and anything.

Rather than counter all this, the American media have wallowed in it. Some, like Fox News and talk radio, have given the haters and blamers their very own megaphones. The rest have merely "reported on" it. Instead of focusing on how to get Americans good jobs again; instead of admitting too many of our schools are failing and our kids are falling behind their contemporaries in Europe, Japan, and even China; instead of showing why we need a more progressive tax system to finance better schools and access to health care, and green technologies that might create new manufacturing jobs, our national discussion has been mired in the old politics.

Listen to this morning’s “Meet the Press” if you want an example. Tim Russert, one of the smartest guys on television, interviewed four political consultants – Carville and Matalin, Bob Schrum, and Michael Murphy. Political consultants are paid huge sums to help politicians spin words and avoid real talk. They’re part of the problem. And what do Russert and these four consultants talk about? The potential damage to Barack Obama from saying that lots of people in Pennsylvania are bitter that the economy has left them behind; about HRC’s spin on Obama’s words (he’s an “elitist,” she said); and John McCain’s similarly puerile attack.

<...>

We’re heading into the worst economic crisis in a half century or more. Many of the Americans who have been getting nowhere for decades are in even deeper trouble. Large numbers of people in Pennsylvania and across the nation are losing their homes and losing their jobs, and the situation is likely to grow worse. Consumers are at the end of their ropes, fuel and food costs are skyrocketing, they can’t go deeper into debt, they can’t pay their bills. They aren’t buying, which means every business from the auto industry to housing to even giant GE is hurting. Which means they’ll begin laying off more people, and as they do, we will experience an even more dangerous downward spiral.

more


Hillary is in the process of shooting herself in the foot again, much in the same way she did with her 3 a.m ad and NAFTA "Shame on you" moment. She is risking the ounce of credibility she has left in the hope that a smear will take down Obama. That's pathetic, and it's only a matter of time before more people realize just how desperate her grand plan is.

Clinton keeps spotlight on Obama

Posted: Monday, April 14, 2008 12:04 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ’s Athena Jones
PITTSBURGH, Pa. -- Hillary Clinton spent a fourth day hitting Obama for comments about small town America that she characterized as elitist, out of touch and problematic for the Democratic Party, but this time some in the crowd could be heard taking issue with what she was saying.

The New York senator brought up the issue near the top of a speech sponsored by the Alliance for American Manufacturing, to quite a few murmurs in the crowd.

VIDEO: Sen. Hillary Clinton responds to Obama's attack earlier in the morning.

"I understand my opponent came this morning and he spent a lot of his time attacking me," she said, before being interrupted with several seconds of murmurs and groans from the crowd. "Well, you know, I know that many of you, like me were disappointed by recent remarks that he made.”

More groans and at least one “No" from the crowd.

“And I think it's important that, you know, we give people the chance to really compare and contrast us,” Clinton continued. “You know, I am well aware that at a fundraiser in San Francisco, he said some things that many people in Pennsylvania and beyond Pennsylvania have found offensive.”

A few more “No”s.

“He was explaining to a small group of his donors what people who live in small towns right here in Pennsylvania are like and why some of you aren't voting for him,” she said. “But instead of looking at himself, he blamed them. He said that they cling to religion and guns and dislike people who are different from them. Well, I don't believe that. I believe that people don't cling to religion; they value their faith. You don't cling to guns, you enjoy hunting or collecting or sport shooting. I don't think he really gets it that people are looking for a president who stands up for you and not looks down on you."

more


Despite Hillary's attempt (ongoing) and the media's fixation on the bitter-gate brouhaha, Obama received three major PA endorsements:

What a smear looks like backfiring: Hillary's "patronizing elitism"




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. No comments? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
22. Ahem. That Gallup Poll graph needs to be updated.
or annotated, doesn't it? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbrother05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. K and R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
She appears to be trying to make herself unelectable in the future. With the rumors of her being handed the New York governorship one would think she had the sense to go out with grace but instead she seems intent to turn herself into a laughingstock so that even that wont be a possibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. yep.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. You can always tell when the spin didn't work:
Rezko reappears, outrage indirectly related to the current outrage begins to surface and claims begin flying that Hillary is just being picked on, not criticized for her repeated lying and dirty campaign tactics.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. K & R
Edited on Mon Apr-14-08 03:09 PM by Scurrilous
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's a great point; she's betting people will be too stupid to notice
and many of them will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NDambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. Pathetic. Perfect word. Perfect fit..like a glove.
Edited on Mon Apr-14-08 03:12 PM by NDambi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Obviously, I agree. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. Hillary, you have a problem
Edited on Mon Apr-14-08 09:12 PM by ProSense
http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stateupdates/gGBJFP">Clinton Supporters reject Clinton Attacks

Rendell Says “Cling” Ain’t No Big Thing


Something tells me Hillary's smear isn't playing well in PA.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. Somebody should take her out back and turn the hose on her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Willo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. "How do I answer that" cackle cackle"
*warning: no script on site, repeat: no script on site. Must handle it blind*

"How many angels dance on the head of a pin?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
15. Bitter bounce
:D


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
16. A campaign built on distortion and spin
Rehashing old news to create the impression that there is more news there:

Hillary Clinton's campaign will announce today that she has the support of 100 Pennsylvania mayors. The announcement is planned for noon at the Capitol in Harrisburg.

A number of mayors, including Harrisburg's Stephen R. Reed, picked Clinton over Barack Obama earlier this year. Clinton will not attend today's announcement. Her staff says she is preparing for Wednesday night's debate with Obama in Philadelphia.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
17. Another endorsement: PA Auditor General endorses Obama

Endorsement for Obama

Auditor General Jack Wagner weighs in

Thomas Fitzgerald reports:

The last statewide elected Democratic official to endorse in the presidential race, Auditor General Jack Wagner, will throw his lot in with Sen. Barack Obama this afternoon in Washington, Pa. Wagner, a former state senator, is a popular "Casey Democrat" pol from western Pennsylvania, which demographically is regarded as hospitable terrain for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Wagner will make his announcement at 1 p.m. at the Rossin Campus Center of Washington & Jefferson College.

Gov. Rendell and Lt. Governor Catherine Baker Knoll back Clinton. U.S. Sen. Bob Casey Jr. is with Obama.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
19. Hillary steps on her own argument
Clinton Acknowledges There's No Good Reason For Her to Stay in Race:

Hillary Clinton and her surrogates have petulantly claimed that the reason why she should stick around after it's clear that there's no way she'll overcome Barack Obama's lead among pledged delegates is that the superdelegates could decide to go with her instead of Obama. The superdelegates' rationale for doing so would presumably need to be based on questions of electability. Hillary Clinton, in the exchange quoted above, said there is no electability argument that can be used against Barack Obama.

The voters have demonstrated a clear preference for Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton. She cannot overcome his lead. Hillary Clinton acknowledges that Barack Obama can beat John McCain. Thus, she's lost, and she has no argument that it's a threat to Democrats to have Barack Obama as our nominee. Therefore, there's no reason for Hillary Clinton to continue her campaign.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
20. Anti-Obama Robocalls Hit Pennsylvania
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
21. K
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC