Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How much will Hillary's lies about her past support of NAFTA & Free Trade hurt her?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:09 PM
Original message
How much will Hillary's lies about her past support of NAFTA & Free Trade hurt her?
Anyone doing any surveys on that?

Gee... wonder why.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acrosstheuniverse Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Honestly people don't care
they would rather base their votes on bullshit because they are afraid of change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Oh no... I think people *do* care...
Edited on Mon Apr-14-08 03:17 PM by redqueen
but all I seem to see are polls about Wright, and "bittergate"... nothing about her lies about NAFTA.

It strikes me as odd...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. The TRUTH will set us all free ... voters deserve to know that
No wonder the sucky mainstream media is doing its best to focus on the "bitter"
comment ... so Obama doesn't get the chance to use this issue against her
in PA the way he wasn't able to in Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Use what? His rhetoric to voters or his actual views to billionaires in SF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The FACT that she DID support NAFTA, which has cost this country jobs
She DOESN'T GET A PASS on this.

And could you please try NOT to bring "bittergate" into EVERY thread?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Why does Obama get a pass from the "true believers" for having the same views on trade?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Prove he has the same views.
Show me where he's said that NAFTA has been great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. Pay $2,300 and see him when the cameras aren't rolling
Or pay $15 and read his book. He sounds just like Hillary Clinton on trade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Uh huh... so you can't back up your assertions.
Thanks for admitting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. Ask John Edwards why he criticized Obama over Peru FTA
Obama also had no objections to CAFTA on the merits. He voted against it only as a protest vote. This is in his book. Look at his voting record on trade. Then look at Clinton's. Exactly the same--except one biggie: Obama was one of a handful of Dems to vote against Dorgan's amendment to crack down on enforcing trade laws. Obama and a few other Dems who the "netroots" hate voted against it. St. Obama has a record. Why do you think we never hear of his trade record but only hear attacks on Clinton on trade and before him on Edwards? They know his trade record is the same as Clinton's and even worse (too bad most people don't know about the Dorgan amendment).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. Again... yeah, they're mostly the same...
But only one has flat-out lied about it.

Are you talking about Dorgan's amendment to ban Mexican trucks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. No, Dorgan's amendment to protect workers from unfair trade practices by foreign nations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. Yeah I saw your other thread. Thanks. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Because he hasn't been in D.C. for YEARS pushing for trade deals
He agrees with the CONCEPT of "fair trade" (and recognizes that worker/
environmental rights need to be included and enforced), but he doesn't
carry the baggage of years of supporting trade at all costs ... and, yes,
this includes NAFTA. All she has to back up her assertion that she wasn't
for it are statements by David Gergen and James Carville; all other signs
point toward her being a "good soldier" and going along with the Clinton
Administration's official position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. No he doesn't. He considers "fair trade" to be "anti-trade"
That is what he says to billionares and millionaires at $2,300 a head fund raisers. He does not say that on the stump, of course--but that is just words.

You are confusing Democratic boilerplate with being for fair trade. Every Dem says that. You can't rely on words. You have to look at their records, platforms, their affiliations (Obama is affiliated with Bob Rubin's Hamilton Project), and follow the money...

Clinton is a "free" trader. I can admit that. Too bad no Obamite can admit so is Obama. In fact, St. Obama's platform on trade is MORE pro "free" trade than Clinton's. Don't rely on just words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
36. prove the fuck he did what fatass Mark Penn did
you people are so fucking full of excuses. This is your livelihood and you wanna act like it's Obama's issue.

Give me a fucking break :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. How did you like today's Rasmussen?
Not what you were hoping for?

bwaaaaahahahaahahahaahahaha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. When is the national primary? Did you see the post-smalltowngate PA and IN polls?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
28. you are as big a hypocrite as Hillary
yesterday, weren't you using Rasmussen as proof that Obama was done for?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5485073

Why, yes, you were.

How do you keep your head from exploding when you encounter such blatant inconsistencies?
Does not compute, does not compute!!!!SNAPCRACKLEPOW!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. Yes, but as evidence changes I change my mind. What do you do?
Clearly, based on the existing evidence, he hasn't been hurt nationally although he may--and I emphasize may (1 poll in each state does not make a trend)--been hurt in PA and IN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #34
43. You had one polls worth of evidence and you made up your mind.
Why not base your decision on the really hard evidence?
The existing election results...

Obama has an insurmountable Delegate lead,
Twice as many States won,
Millions more in Funds and Donors,
and a Real Nationwide Movement

You are basing all your decisions on the hope that Obama somehow loses all of that.

Why has none of this Real Evidence changed your mind?
Maybe it is because your loyalty to Hillary is clouding your reasoning.
Could this be the case?

What evidence, short of Hillary withdrawing, would it take for you to change your mind to support Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. I have always said one poll does not make a trend. Ask hnmf
I have explained why I think Hill can still win numerous times. You'll get an idea in 8 days. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #45
53. something tells me that even if Obama won PA, that still wouldn't be enough evidennce for you
Do you truly think Hillary will catch up in Delegates?

Do you truly think that the SDs will overturn the PDs?

If you cannot honestly answer yes to either of these, then you are deluding yourself in holding on to Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JasonHill Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. His views
were the same views articulated by both Hillary and Bill. That makes those who attack him for having them while not attacking Bill and Hillary as Hypocrites.

Bill:

"If could cut funding for Medicare, Medicaid, education, and the environment, middle-class Americans would see fewer benefits from their tax dollars, feel more resentful paying taxes, and become even more receptive to their appeals for tax cuts and their strategy of waging campaigns on divisive social and cultural issues like abortion, gay rights, and guns."

-- Bill Clinton, in his 2004 memoirs, My Life, making the same argument as Sen. Barack Obama.
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2008/04/13/historical_quote_of_the_day.html

Hillary:

mmigration: The Hottest Issue
Wednesday, Nov. 28, 2007 By JOE KLEIN

<snip>

There are signs of festering intolerance even among Democratic audiences, noticeably in Iowa, which has seen a surge of Latino immigration in recent years. The Democratic candidates are uniformly in favor of comprehensive immigration reform, including a path to citizenship for those who have entered the country illegally. But they receive sharp — pointed — applause when they say illegals should "have to speak English" before becoming citizens. When I asked Hillary Clinton about that, she said she'd noticed it too and added, "During the 1990s, I cannot remember being asked about immigration... Why? Because the economy was working... And average Americans didn't have to go around looking for someone to blame."


http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1688794,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. They sure went bananas over her Bosnia tall tales... why not this?
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Not much since everyone outside the "netroots" and Obamanation realizes both are for "free trade"
Why are you "anti-trade", in Obama's corporate Wall Street code? Are you bitter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Yeah... right.
Sorry, but not everyone knows she lied her ass off.

Or... are you admitting that right now? That when she campaigned in OH she was lying her ass off about her past support of NAFTA?

Do you really think everyone knows she lied her ass off about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. No but they know she is a "free" trader--just like the messiah obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. They need to know she is A LIAR.
Edited on Mon Apr-14-08 03:23 PM by redqueen
And not about petty BS... but actual ISSUES... NAFTA, free trade... IRAQ and whether they were a threat.

You know... ISSUES.


And stop calling him a messiah... you are being a delusional Hillary supporter. It's unbecoming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. They know she is a liar, just like St. Obama and every other politician
Like how Obama says one thing to voters, another thing to the Canadian government and billionaire's in SF.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Do you think it's cute? Calling him "Saint" Obama?
Did Obama speak to the Canadian government, or are you conflating your BS claims?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. I think it is cute--and scary--how his "devoted followers" view him as a saint
Never lied, never flip flopped, never cast a wrong vote, never wrong on a single policy, never makes any mistake of any sort (i.e. smalltowngate), never goes negative, etc.

Back when we supported Edwards I am sure we could point out instances where he was wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. You're making a lot of (stupid) assumptions...
and yeah... I can see where Obama's been wrong.

But has he flat-out lied about his past positions, the way Hillary has?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #39
46. You can. How many Obamites can?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. Who gives a shit? HE DIDN'T LIE ABOUT IT.
That's the issue with me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. So you freely admit they know they are supporting a liar?
Well, that's different from the people who voted for Bush how?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. You vote for the candidates available. Sadly--aside from Obama--not saint has run for president
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #35
52. False dichotomy.
The options are not:

Saint vs. Bald-faced liar.

The options are:

Non-bald-faced liar vs. bald-faced liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hillary tells no lies! Why are you an elistist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. Sure she does
I can admit that but I am not a cultish follower of her...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. You're pretty big on slandering Obama's supporters, though.
Is that much better, do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. It will hurt her a lot, and its being saved for the last few days before PA votes
Everything at this stage (including Obama's 'bitter' comment) is 24 hour news air filler.

The Obama campaign is holding off on the real damage they can inflict on Hillary over her free trade past until its too late in the news cycle to be dismissed by the MSM and the voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I'm sure you're right...
his campaign is pretty astute... hers seems like it's being run by the keystone kops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NDambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
19. She and her grab bag hubby have proven themselves as liars to me...and those around me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. I agree. That is why we must elect St. Obama. He has never told a lie
We are so lucky that we have a chance to vote for a saint for president. He has never lied, never flip flopped, never cast a bad vote. Perfect!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NDambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #29
40.  I view the
Clintons as liars (and I do) that is my choice...you do what's best for you.

I never said Obama was a saint..but I know for sure Billy Gruff is a BIG sinner...lmao! And we know, Hilda has lied about Bosnia amongst other things..

Both of them..just lying liars..ugh! Hallelujah she's behind in every category..can't wait for them to just go away..to crawl under a bridge and troll without toll.

Ding Dong!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
20. A lot if she keeps calling attention to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
30. Blame it on the Amish - they don't get cable.
Man, I can feel the heat from the flamethrowers already, for me picking on a religious sect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
41. Obama should hit her hard on this in the debate. She can't laugh it off there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. I hope he does.
I know they're similar on trade... but I don't think he's treated the voters like idiots by just flat-out lying to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. Ask the Canadian government what he says to them--not what he said to Ohio voters in public...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. What did he ever say to them?
You're confused... either that or you're being sloppy with your words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
51. oodles. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC