Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TPM: Theda Skocpol: For It Before She Was Against It ("Bitter")

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 10:30 PM
Original message
TPM: Theda Skocpol: For It Before She Was Against It ("Bitter")
Edited on Mon Apr-14-08 11:01 PM by SunsetDreams
For it, Before She Was Against It

Theda Skocpol writes in ...

I have been in meetings with the Clintons and their advisors where very clinical things were said in a very-detached tone about unwillingness of working class voters to trust government -- and Bill Clinton -- and about their unfortunate (from a Clinton perspective) proclivity to vote on life-style rather than economic issues. To see Hillary going absolutely over the top to smash Obama for making clearly more humanly sympathetic observations in this vein, is just amazing. Even more so to see her pretending to be a gun-toting non-elite. Give us a break!
I wonder if she realizes that gaining a few days of lurid publicity that might reach a slice of voters is going to cost her a great deal in the regard of many Democrats, whose strong support she will need if she somehow claws her way to the nomination -- and even more so if she does not clinch the nomination. The distribution of "we're not bitter" stickers to her campaign rallies is the height of over-the-top crudity, and the reports are that very few audience members seem to have much enthusiasm for this nonsense. Not surprisingly, people cannot see the reasons for so much fuss.

Yes, she wants a big break, she desperately wants the nomination she and Bill believe is hers by right. We all know that. But where is her authenticity and her dignity and her sense of any proportion?

This has to be one of the few times in U.S. political history when a multi-millionaire has accused a much less wealthy fellow public servant, a person of the same party and views who made much less lucrative career choices, of "elitism"! (I won't say the only time, because U.S. political history is full of absurdities of this sort.) In a way, it is funny -- and it may not be long before the jokes start.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/188673.php

Who is she?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theda_Skocpol



________________________________________________________________________________

THE SMOKING GUN on Hillary Clinton? She's said Obama demeaned working class values

yet Theda Skocpol revealed
that in multiple meetings with her, both Bill & Hillary spoke about the working class and "their unfortunate (from a Clinton perspective) proclivity to vote on life-style rather than economic issues. To see Hillary going absolutely over the top to smash Obama for making clearly more humanly sympathetic observations in this vein, is just amazing."
from TalkingPointsMemo.

So why hasn't this been in the news? I'd like to see Theda Skocpol share about those meetings on the national news.

http://ph.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080414172327AAH8Wdf
__________________________________________________________________________________

B. Clinton: Jobs tied to anti-trade, anti-immigrant politics

From The Charlie Rose Show, 12/15/07. "So I think that the rise of this is sort of crystallized for a lot of people, that I think doubling healthcare premiums has had a lot to do with this -- the further loss of health insurance coverage in America. So there's a lot of economic anxiety. In the Republican Party, it expresses itself as this sort of very hard line against immigration. In the Democratic Party, it expresses itself in a very hard line against trade. But the real problem is we haven't created enough good new jobs."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYi_qNWdjgw

____________________________________________________________________________

Hey Hillary, the Bible tells people to "cling" to your faith in Christ

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5504931

_______________________________________________________________________________________

I Was There: What Obama Really Said About Pennsylvania

Last Sunday evening I attended the San Francisco fundraiser that has been the center of recent political jousting. The next day, when asked about the talk Obama delivered, I too commented about his answer to a question he was asked about Pennsylvania. Over the past week, though, I have had a Rashomon-like experience concerning those remarks.

Clinton, McCain, and media pundits have parsed a blogger's audio tape of Obama's remarks and criticized a sentence or two characterizing some parts of Pennsylvania and the attitudes of some Pennsylvanians. In context and in person, Senator Obama's remarks about Pennsylvania voters left an impression diametrically opposed to that being trumpeted by his competitor's campaigns.

At the end of Obama's remarks standing between two rooms of guests -- the fourth appearance in California after traveling earlier in the day from Montana -- a questioner asked, "some of us are going to Pennsylvania to campaign for you. What should we be telling the voters we encounter?"

Obama's response to the questioner was that there are many, many different sections in Pennsylvania comprised of a range of racial, geographic, class, and economic groupings from Appalachia to Philadelphia. So there was not one thing to say to such diverse constituencies in Pennsylvania. But having said that, Obama went on say that his campaign staff in Pennsylvania could provide the questioner (an imminent Pennsylvania volunteer) with all the talking points he needed. But Obama cautioned that such talking points were really not what should be stressed with Pennsylvania voters.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-coleman/i-was-there-what-obama-re_b_96553.html

__________________________________________________________________________________________


Manufacturing job losses cripple growth in Pennsylvania

The American Manufacturing Trade Action Coalition (AMTAC) has analyzed job gain/loss in Pennsylvania in a report prepared by Dr. Charles W. McMillion, president and chief economist of MBG Information Services, titled, Pennsylvania’s Jobs Market 2001-2008: Trading Down in A Debt-Driven, Weak Economy.



Reacting to the report, Peter McKernan, CEO of Herculite Products Inc. of Emigsville, Pa., said, "Pennsylvania can’t keep trading good manufacturing jobs for lower paying service sector jobs and expect to grow its economy. Americans haven't stopped buying manufactured goods; they just aren’t buying as many from Pennsylvania as before. That’s what has got to change if Pennsylvania is to recover the more than 207,000 manufacturing jobs it has lost since 2001 and recharge its economy.”



Noting that U.S. manufacturing’s competitiveness concerns are fostered by Chinese and other foreign-country predatory trade practices such as blatant currency manipulation, rebates of value-added (VAT) taxes, and outright export subsidies, McKernan stated, "A detailed policy response from the administration, all presidential candidates, and the Democratic and Republican leaderships in Congress to address U.S. manufacturing competitiveness is long overdue. Without this, sectors of the Pennsylvania economy subject to international competition will continue to bleed jobs and wither from the lack of capital investment.”


more here:
http://www.reliableplant.com/article.asp?pagetitle=Manufacturing%20job%20losses%20cripple%20growth%20in%20Pennsylvania&articleid=11398


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Not as exciting when something gets debunked?
sad, sad place that DU is right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ampad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kickety kick kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. thanks and rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. your welcome and thanks for kicking :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDoorbellRang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thanks, SunsetDreams
None of this comes as a surprise, but it won't get flamed to life by our dear M$M.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I know it's a rediculous over blown argument.
Hillary goes and makes an ad? Is she not comfortable with voters deciding if it's offensive to them or not? She has to shove it down their throats, with a clipped quote?

LOL She cracks me up with her pathetic attempts. It's only made me even more positive that she can't win on the issues, so she resorts to petty attacks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDoorbellRang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I am SO looking forward to their debate
I hope he "creaminates" her. I wish she'd just take her peculiar brand of Clinton drama and go home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. me too, If you would have asked me a couple weeks ago
I would have said just let her play it out, as long as she can stop the rediculous attacks.

But now, not so much.

It's clear to me it's just a pathetic game to her now, she no longer can win on issues or personality, so we are left with desperate attacks.

Although I haven't made my mind completely up, I'm starting to wonder if she has lost my vote forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
11. Excellent! Thank you!
I am so completely sick of Hillary Clinton's campaign I could scream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 05:19 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. your welcome, I hear you me too :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
12. K&R - Very good piece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
13. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 04:59 AM
Response to Original message
14. K&R. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
16. Thanks for the rec's and kicks :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC