ecstatic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-15-08 09:56 PM
Original message |
Hillary has not been vetted yet, because Obama isn't going there with her |
|
Edited on Tue Apr-15-08 10:08 PM by Truth Hurts A Lot
We have no idea what attacks will be used by the GOP, should she somehow become the nominee, because Obama has not been playing from the far right wing republican playbook.
|
joeybee12
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-15-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message |
1. We have a winner for most delusional post ever! |
|
Where were you in the 1990's?????
|
anonymous171
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-15-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Where have the republicans been since 2000 onward on Hillary? |
ecstatic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-15-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. Um... I'm sure they have new material. That was a LONG time ago nt |
mrreowwr_kittty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-15-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
10. No, you're the winner. Time didn't freeze in 2000. |
|
In case you hadn't heard, Bill's been on a "woman diet" the past year.
|
goldcanyonaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-15-08 09:59 PM
Response to Original message |
2. You've got to be kidding. She's been vetted in spades. |
GarbagemanLB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-15-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. When? Running in NY against a nobody? As first lady? No. The right wing has never fully opened up |
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-15-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. No she hasn't.....not General election tested...... |
|
All of the shit that's been unearthed since 2000 ain't even been touched, cause soon-to-be President O hasn't gone there. McCain will pulvarize her, smiling the entire time. He wants to run against her, so that he can be the maverick....something he cannot boast with Obama running against him.
|
goldcanyonaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-15-08 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
11. What the fuck is your picture of Hillary supposed to represent? |
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-15-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. Aren't you one of those "smart and educated but not elite" Hillary voters? |
goldcanyonaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-15-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. No'sm masser I is elite. I's a come from a goods background. |
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-16-08 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. That's a matter of relativity..... |
|
wouldn't you say?
And I don't know why you are masser-ing me. I'm a woman and I'm brown.
|
Raven
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-15-08 09:59 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Good point! A decent, intelligent politician...how refreshing! n/t |
Beacool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-15-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message |
8. She hasn't been vetted???????????? |
|
Where have you been for the last 16 years????
Too funny!!!!!!!
|
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-15-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Who cares? Neither have the other also-rans. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:43 AM
Response to Original message |