http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/04/16/bitter/?source=newsletterBitter as hell in Pennsylvania
Folks agree with Barack Obama in at least one Pennsylvania trailer park. But will angry voters help or hurt Democrats in swing states this fall?By Mike Madden
April 16, 2008 | EXETER, Penn. -- Shawn Erfman lives in a trailer park, listens to Rush Limbaugh and voted for George W. Bush -- twice. Over the weekend, he heard all about what Barack Obama had to say about "bitter" Pennsylvanians like himself. And he's mad as hell.
Not at the guy you might expect, though. "It's fucking true," he said Monday night. "Everybody's bitter for one reason or another. So they're crucifying him because he spoke the truth? Cause he's not saying something that's going to suck up to people and kiss ass? Because, what, he slipped and accidentally spoke the truth, instead of kissing butt?"
A 37-year-old mechanic for a construction company, Erfman won't be voting Republican this time around. While he isn't a registered Democrat and can't vote in next week's primary, he'd be happy to go for Obama in November. (Or Hillary Clinton, for that matter.) "I do like him, I think that he would be a change," Erfman said. "Believe it or not, I voted for Bush. See where that got me?" But when you get right down to it, Erfman -- like many of his neighbors -- doesn't see much chance of any politician really doing a lot to help the dwindling middle class in northeastern Pennsylvania. "It doesn't make a difference who I go vote for, whoever gets in is going to see fit to try to make it go their way," Erfman said. His wife, Heidi, felt the same way. "Can I vote for Mickey Mouse?" she asked.
- snip -
So while Obama and Clinton fight on, some of the eventual winner's allies are already trying to reach blue-collar voters for the general election. The AFL-CIO, which will surely endorse either Democrat over McCain, is focusing on communities like Exeter through an offshoot called Working America. Essentially, it's labor's attempt to organize people in 10 swing states who would have belonged to unions a generation or two ago -- when they would have worked higher-paying jobs with better benefits -- but don't now. The goal is to get these people, largely whites from exurbs and old inner suburbs, thinking about how different government policies could change their personal economic situations -- and voting for the candidates the AFL-CIO thinks would help. (Translation: Democrats.) Over the last four years, the group has signed up 2 million members around Pennsylvania, Ohio, Minnesota, Michigan, Wisconsin and other big industrial states where the election is likely, once again, to pivot. Once they join, members get plugged into the AFL-CIO's massive database for targeted mail, phone calls and return visits closer to the election. As a result, organizers say, members turn out to vote almost as reliably as actual union members do. Among registered voters who joined Working America, 70 percent voted in Ohio's 2006 election, compared to 75 percent for voters represented by AFL-CIO unions (and 51 percent for people who weren't members of either). While only 38 percent of Working America members in Ohio identified themselves as Democrats in 2006, 58 percent of them supported Ted Strickland for governor. The AFL-CIO calls it the biggest get-out-the-vote operation no one's ever heard of.
- snip -
Of course, in recent years the sidewalks in swing states have been crammed with bright-eyed organizers from groups claiming they could pull off a Democratic victory; the best-known, America Coming Together, burned $10 million of money from unions and George Soros on Election Day four years ago, only to see Bush rack up the biggest popular vote total in American history on the way to beating John Kerry. It shut down soon after (but not before federal election officials fined it three-quarters of a million dollars for illegal fundraising). Working America officials say they've got a much better sense of who their members are and how to reach them -- they have phone numbers for 89 percent of them and know what kind of work 88 percent of them do -- and think they'll have better luck.
The good news, for whoever winds up with the Democratic nomination, is they may be able to lose the white working-class vote and still win the election. A recent paper by sociologists Ruy Teixeira and Alan Abramowitz for the Brookings Institution estimated that Obama or Clinton needs to hold the Republican margin among white blue-collar voters to around 10 percentage points, instead of the 23 points Kerry lost by. In key states like Pennsylvania and Ohio, a Democrat would have to keep it much closer to win. (In West Virginia and Kentucky, the candidate would need a majority.) "These voters have gotten nowhere under the Bush administration, and they're pretty aware of that," Teixeira said in an interview. Whether they decide to give the Democrats a shot as a result could determine who wins.
- snip -
"Bush gave Republicans a bad name," said Sciandra, 46, the repairman. A veteran of six years in the Marines, he voted for Bush in 2000 but supports Clinton this time. If McCain can't win him over, it might be a bad sign. Sciandra said he understood what Obama meant, and wasn't offended by the idea that he "clings" to guns. "I hunt, I fish, I love the outdoors," he said. "Me, I tell you, I'm not worried about anybody taking my guns ... I think it just came out the wrong way." As for Erfman, he's more worried about healthcare than his job. His 60-year-old mother-in-law, Iona White, just moved in with his family so she could get onto their health insurance. A lifelong Democrat, White says she'll vote for Obama next week. "It's a bad time in the world," she said. "People are bitter."
MORE
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
