Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Want to know the biggest reason why I "cling" to my guns?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 03:37 PM
Original message
Want to know the biggest reason why I "cling" to my guns?
http://www.blackwaterusa.com/


If these fuckers ever try to overthrow our government you might be glad that some of your rural Democratic friends have some firearms for you to borrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oreo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Screw em
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Scew you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Check the HuffPo front page, oh-uninformed-one. If you can put your guns down long enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder what kind of piece Hillary Oakley carries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
37. She has the Secret Service to carry Uzis and MP-5s on her behalf
She doesn't need to carry a weapon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. In case of National Emergency, Clinton wants to confiscate guns.
Edited on Wed Apr-16-08 03:39 PM by anonymous171
So you'd be fucked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. HC voted "yea" for the appropriations bill that included an amendment against confiscation. You
really do need to get your facts right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. I believe this is the vote they were referring to
Edited on Wed Apr-16-08 04:25 PM by Lone_Star_Dem
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00202

The Vitter Amendment: To prohibit the confiscation of a firearm during an emergency or major disaster if the possession of such firearm is not prohibited under Federal or State law.


There were 84 Yeas and 16 Nays. Clinton was one of the 16 Nays.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Senate votes for Amdt. 4615 and its parent bill H.R. 5441 below. HC voted for the bill as amended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Yet first she voted against the amendment not to confiscate guns during an emergency
Which is what the poster was referring to. Not the fact that she voted for the bundled appropriations bill.

She can't have it both ways. Sorry.

The vote on the Vitter Amendment was a chance for her to make her views clear on the issue of firearm confiscation (such as what took place in New Orleans after Katrina) and she took advantage of the opportunity. As did all the rest who voted either yea or nay on the amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. The facts are that HC voted for a bill, now law, that prohibits gun confiscation. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. This is the stupid stuff that makes primary season such a joy around here
Don't use asinine backward logic on me. I know why she voted on the appropriations bill just the same as every other person on this board. And it wasn't because she had an immediate change of heart on firearm confiscations, but rather due to the rest of the content and the need for the fundings to go though. Pretending otherwise doesn't change anything, including the fact that she gets to carry this vote around her neck like an albatross.

Back when she cast this vote...long ago in a DU that once was...we were discussing at the time how this would be looked at poorly when/if she were to run for president. Now in the DU primary universe we are going to change history and distort facts to serve our lords. Lines have been drawn, sides have been taken and war has been declared! Whatever. Pardon me for not giving a damn whose toes this steps on, but it's still a fact that this will go against her in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Facts are HC voted to prohibit confiscation of guns. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Moments after she specifically voted for confiscating firearms.
I wish you the best of luck with selling that to voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. That's HC's problem just as BO's support for banning handguns and semiautomatic guns is BO's problem
IMO the only way HC & BO can shed their gun-grabber image is to promise voters, "I will veto every bill that comes to me as president that infringes on the natural, inherent, inalienable right of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms for self-defense."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. I can see the reasoning behind your solution to the issue
I can even agree with it. However, changing their stances won't matter all that much. Obama's stance on banning the sale and manufacture of handguns was in what? 1996 when he was a state legislator? Then he changed his stance some 4 years later on the issue and it would appear it's still an issue.

Right now with the Democrats who support gun rights Obama has a slight lead over Hillary. Which only means that for those for whom that's an issue they'll vote for Obama before Hillary if given a choice between the two. Which they won't be in the GE. The problem is it's not the Democrats we're needing to woo when it comes to this issue. It's the Independents who are pro-gun rights. Which is a horse of a completely different color. How do we bridge the gap between how they feel regarding gun rights and how the majority of our party feels regarding gun rights? Frankly, I don't think we do. Our candidates get stuck between the majority of Democrats who want sensible gun control and regulation legislation and those who fear that any further regulation would lead to an infringement on their rights. It's a touchy situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. BO was a board member of the Joyce Foundation and they offered him their presidency. Joyce funds
the Violence Policy Center and its goal is to ban all handguns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. So you're agreeing that there's no reason for them to come out professing to be pro gun rights?
Edited on Wed Apr-16-08 07:12 PM by Lone_Star_Dem
Or, are you back to our discussion being all about "mine is better than yours?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. Keep reading and rereading my posts. My point is BO & HC are perceived as ant-gun and they need to
change their gun-grabber image to gain votes from independent voters who are also part of the 80 million gun owners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oreo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. More here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. HC voted "yea" for H.R. 5441 as amended by Amdt. 4615 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Conspiracy theory driven paranoia?
Yeah, that's a wonderful reason to cling to guns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Didn't Jefferon say that a government should fear the people,
not the other way around??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Yep.
"When governments fear people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oreo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. What do you say to this....
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00202

To prohibit the confiscation of a firearm during an emergency or major disaster if the possession of such firearm is not prohibited under Federal or State law.

Obama (D-IL), Yea
Clinton (D-NY), Nay

I'm looking forward to your excuse thoughts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
40ozDonkey Donating Member (730 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Let's check back later!
And see how this plays out.

Also, :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
42. Yes and he wanted a highly armed population with no standing army.
We have both btw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Conspiracy huh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. And that's just one good reason.
I could probably think of a couple of dozen more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yep. I wondered why Bushie needed
ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND of the fuckers running around without oversight.

I'm thinking they will all be domestic "drug agents" here pretty soon.....


:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
14. As long as psychopaths like Bush and Cheney have power, I will never give up my guns.
If things get much worse in this country, we might need them.

We might have to use them and overthrow the corrupt, criminal gang that our government has become and restore our Constitution.

As long as that's an even remote possibility, I'm keeping my firearms.

As long as the possibility exists that Blackwater thugs or corrupt FBI goons might kick down my door, toss me into some dungeon and steal everything I've got, I'm gonna want the chance to shoot one of the bastards in the face.

Yeah. I'll shoot a law enforcement officer in the face with a twelve gauge slug if he tries to destroy my liberties. That's how fucking furious I am at this government. Bush's government is completely intolerable, and it's got to go, and I don't care if we throw them out with the ballot or the bullet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
15. I don't own a gun
I consider myself a pacifist, and though I am not a Christian, I admire Christ's pacifism. Thou shalt not kill is a good one too. I know I would give my life for some things, but take a life, no. I'm 57 and know that if you are looking for trouble, you can find it. If you are peaceful, you will find peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. I saw a "Penn & Teller explain Gun Control" video
Naturally they were against it. But there was a quote in there that I remembered.

"If you're threatened by a gang member, you can call the police. But what will you do if you're threatened by the police?"

I don't know where the quote originated. But I could not agree more.

But I'd change my avatar if I were you. That lady ain't a friend to gun owners no matter what she's saying now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. This urbanite agrees completely... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
21. SIGH
It never ceases to amaze me. This idiotic cowboy over-throwers of the tyrannical government fantasy that gun lovers have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knixphan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Florida22ndDistrict Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #21
33. re: SIGH
Most gun owners use their guns for target practice or hunting. I'm willing to bet that most of them also know someone who lived through the great depression and take peace of mind in the fact that they know how to acquire meat for their family in the event that our country faces economic decline. With two recessions occurring under the Bush administration's watch, rampant deficit spending, and a massive trade deficit that swells by the minute, maybe you should take that into consideration. Knowing a bit about guns/hunting and gardening doesn't hurt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bread_and_roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #21
46. I 'm with you.
Edited on Wed Apr-16-08 08:56 PM by kenzee13
meant to add...don't I keep reading that most Americans support various forms of gun control? And didn't Gore and Kerry win? (I refuse to consider the '04 Ohio election as anything but an outright theft). But we keep hearing how Dems will lose because of guns....?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
23. I don't know
IED's seem to be more effective against those guys than small-arms fire...

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #23
34. LOL ...so true. My Hi Point 9mm C9 +Comp wouldn't as effective for sure....
but it does give me and my wife a defense in my own childless home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
26. And you JUST PROVED Obama right
You are so distraught by and mistrust your government that you cling to guns instead of supporting candidates that will stand up for your economic self interests.

This is exactly what Obama said, and you just admitted it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
28. Is that how you choose a candidate?
based on fear that the 'liberals' will take away your guns?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. That's one of our "pro-gun Democrats" in action alright: funny, they always seem to end up posting
the kind of bullshit that would make a freeper proud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
36. Urban Democrats have guns, too...we just don't build shrines for them. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
41. I support the 2nd Amendment and Obama. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
44. The right to own guns is a LIBERAL idea! Personal Freedom is also
a democratic idea!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC