Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What's left For Hillary When She Loses?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Razorblade01 Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 06:42 AM
Original message
What's left For Hillary When She Loses?
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 06:44 AM by Razorblade01
The liberal talk show hosts as well as Obama and co have vilified her to the point that I believe her political career is over. He's NOT going to appoint her V.P. and we all know this. So what is left for her? I voted for Hillary on Super Tuesday. Granted she has done a few things that disgusts even me. But I still can't believe the way the Democratic party has turned their collective backs on her and Bill. Hopefully she runs for her Senate Seat again or perhaps Governor Of N.Y. But could she win after all the swiftboating? I don't know...

Your Thoughts?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. I heard she is pretty good as a Senator.
Maybe she could go back to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Razorblade01 Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Would any Obama supporter ever vote for Her down the road?
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 06:49 AM by Razorblade01
She's probably be too old by then, but would any of you vote for her for President after Obama's out of the picture?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
25. Not now. The plan was well carried out. BUT time heals most wounds
but it does not heal Clinton hate. The hate is irrational in the first place so there will be little change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
28. I doubt I would ever vote for her.
It has nothing to do with the way she has been "vilified." It has everything to do with the way she has tried to discredit Obama after he became the virtually-presumptive Democratic nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
33. I plan to campaign against her again in the Senate primary in '12.
Many of us now consider *this* to be her '12 primary bid. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ps1074 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. 109 million?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Razorblade01 Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. What about the Kennedy's?
They have millions. I don't see any of you gripe about them. It's not the problem that they have money. It's that she is running against your guy, face it. The Kennedys proved you canbe rich and still care about the poor. And I believe that Hiallary and Bill are the same. Besides.. Obama isn't exactly POOR. You can't be poor and run for President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. Two differences
1) The Kennedys did not run calling LBJ, McCarthy or Carter elitists. That is what HRC did - at a point where she and her husband have been Democratic royalty, held to different standards than anyone else, for 15 years.

2) Much of the Clinton money came from sources that will have issues before the US government and many are countries run by people who we as Democrats have problems with. It is troubling when Bill Clinton gets $800,000 for 4 speeches from Colombia. The current version of the Colombia treaty is being rammed down the throats of Congress without even going to the committees with jurisdiction.

Kerry's comment:

BOSTON – Senator John Kerry sent a letter today to President George Bush, expressing his disappointment that the President sent an incomplete Colombian Free Trade Agreement to Congress for an immediate up or down vote.

“This trade deal is a slap in the face to thousands of people in Colombia who have been killed just trying to exercise the right to organize, and yet President Bush has refused to allow the proper Congressional committees even to have a voice in the process and negotiate improvements,” said Senator Kerry. “To unilaterally force an up or down vote on a bill negotiated solely by the Bush Administration is more than a mistake, it’s an outrage. I strongly urge the President to reconsider his position, and allow us to work together on trade.”

(from the letter itself)

<snip>
"As you are undoubtedly aware, it is a matter of standard procedure that the congressional committees of jurisdiction be permitted the opportunity to register concerns with legislation prior to it being filed under trade promotion authority. To sidestep this critical negotiating step by unilaterally forcing an up or down vote on a bill negotiated solely by the Administration is an abuse of trade promotion authority, and frankly justifies abandoning any effort to reestablish that privilege for the remaining months of your Administration.

Several objections that have been raised against the legislation deserve your attention, and must be addressed prior to consideration of the agreement. At the top of the list is the persistent violence waged against trade unionists in Colombia. Twelve union members have been killed this year alone, and over the past twenty years more than 2,500 have lost their lives exercising a right considered to be fundamental to America’s workers."



http://kerry.senate.gov/cfm/record.cfm?id=295872
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Razorblade01 Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. The Kennedy's Aren't Considered Elitest or Dem Royalty?
..and about Kennedy. Please. We all know how old man Joe got wealthy off Bootlegging in the old days.. Not to belittle the Kennedy's but you mentioned it..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #23
36. There are conflicting stories
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 08:09 AM by karynnj
on whether or not Joe Kennedy was a bootlegger - not to mention that I'm not speaking of him - but his sons. So, even if I concede the point, it would be like blaming Chelsea if it assumed Bill or HRC did something wrong.

I think the Kennedys were part of the social elite, which they were brought up to think gave them a responsibility to return something to the community. They did not take it to mean that they were better than others, just privileged. Look at the legislation that Ted Kennedy got passed. Listen to the words of RFK.

The word "elitist" is related to the word "elite", but there is a huge difference. Elitist was defined as the belief in the rule by an alite class of people. I would concede that the Kennedy brothers were born into the upper crust - as was John Kerry and Howard Dean. Yet, I see nothing in their actions that suggest they thought that their wealth and background entitled them to rule. (Howard Dean grew up in a home facing Central Park on Park Avenue in Manhattan. His family was old money and connected very distantly to all the other elite NE families.)

You don't answer that they didn't run calling others elitists and they themselves weren't involved with bad foreign governments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobRossi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. "The View"
Or some other cackle fest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Razorblade01 Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. So are you anti Female for Prez?
Sounds like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. No, we are anti-cackle. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Razorblade01 Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Which sounds like your anti female
N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #12
29. Nope, I've heard men cackle too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Cackle fest
:rofl: :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polpilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
20. Divorce Court?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. She will continue to serve in politics, and live a rich, full life.
I admire this woman very much, as a woman myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
10. Ashes
of self-immolation and a puddle of self-pity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
11. She'll continue to be
powerful and successful, just to piss you off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bentcorner Donating Member (385 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
13. She will have to work hard in the Senate with another Republican president.
If Obama is given the nomination, we are looking at a McCain presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Razorblade01 Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I don't think so.
Those millions of young new voters did not sign up as Democrats only to let McCain win. Just can't see that. Wait for a few debates between Obama and Mccain. Obama will eat him alive!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. How do you come up with this?
McSame is a clueless old man whose brain is fried from being tortured. He promises a continuation of bush policies and endless war in Iraq at a time when 81% of the public says the country is on the wrong track, precisely because of bush and his War.

Obama is young and vital and represents the future. McSame is old and tired and represents the past. (He heard the news about Pearl Harbor in person, for God's sake!) And yet you are sure at this early point (nobody has even been nominated yet) that America will choose in November to continue down the path 81% of us have called "wrong" instead of voting for the change we all say we want.

Sorry, I just don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bentcorner Donating Member (385 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #15
31. He's running for President of the United States, not the President of Democratic Underground
Polls show that most Americans think Iraq was a mistake, but they also show that they favor McCain over Obama or Clinton. You might think he is a clueless old man and make fun of the fact that he was a POW, but more Americans prefer him then the other two candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
16. She's finished in politics, so who knows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
17. She will cruise to reelection in the Senate.
That seat's hers for as long as she wants it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
19. Don't know, don't care just so long as she's NOT the nominee
and if I were a resident of NY, I'd be backing anyone but her when she runs for reelection to her senate seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. You have the same thoughts I do. Who gives a rats azz?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
22. She'll survive. Maybe she'll learn to bake cookies, or something.
She has no worries, financially or otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Razorblade01 Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. Spoken like a real Chauvinist!
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 07:28 AM by Razorblade01
You didn't also sign up for the Three Stooges's woman haters club did ya? Just kidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
24. She can spend her time doing shots in crummy bars in Indiana
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
27. Hmmm...


:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
30. "Screw 'em!" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
32. An unsuccessful bid for Senate majority leader and a crushing Senate primary defeat. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
34. She and Howard Wolfson will be able to earn a living in the northern
states, shoveling people's drive ways with all those snow shovels they ordered in Iowa.

See? They plan for the long-term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
35. They are the ones that have turned their back on the party
When she said that McCain was more experienced than Obama she turned away from the party.

As they negatively campaign against Obama, they turn their backs on the party.

They have done the RNC's work for them, they have used Rovian tactics and run negative and it is the Clintons that have hurt the Clintons and turned away from the party.

The party hasn't kicked them to the curb which is exactly what it should do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mobius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
37. Dancing With The Stars
followed by an appearance as a body on CSI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
38. IF she loses, she should go kick Harry Reid's ass to the curb...
...and TAKE the Senate Majority Leader position. Senator Obama, if he gets by McCain, will have to go by Senator Clinton for all his legislative plans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC