Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton Not Winning Over Undecided Superdelegates With Obama bashing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:14 AM
Original message
Clinton Not Winning Over Undecided Superdelegates With Obama bashing
Hillary Clinton's bludgeoning of Barack Obama for his guns-and-religion gaffe doesn't seem to be winning over the most crucial audience for her long shot presidential hopes - undecided Democratic superdelegates.

"She's not changing my mind," said superdelegate Deborah Kozikowski of Chicopee, Mass., a founder of RuralVotes.com, a Web site devoted to small-town priorities.

"To me, this is a wash. He made a mistake. How he handles it, and what his policies are, will be more important to me than a slip of the tongue."

Rank-and-file Democrats seem to agree.

Polls taken over the past week show Obama suffered little damage among likely voters in Pennsylvania's April 22 primary after saying blue-collar small-town voters "cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them...to explain their frustrations."

Clinton hit Obama's words as "elitist" and "talking down" to heartland Americans - seeking a game-changer to shake Obama off his front-runner's perch and drive up her vote in Pennsylvania and the remaining primaries.

But the only way she can catch Obama is to pull a vast majority of the 250 or so uncommitted superdelegates to her side.

And superdelegates contacted by the Daily News all said they viewed Obama's comments as an inartful stumble on the campaign trail, not a fatal mistake
.

"It's all part of a longer process, in which we are getting to know more about our candidates, and our candidates are getting to know more about running," said attorney Ralph Dawson, a New York superdelegate who remains undecided.

Many superdelegates said the comments were less important than how Obama is handling the pile-on by Clinton and Republican candidate John McCain.

"What I want to see," said Christine Pelosi, daughter of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, "is how can you withstand that pressure, how can you withstand the echo chamber.

"I'm impressed so far that acknowledged that he made a mistake with his words," she added, "but he didn't back down from the sentiment behind them."

She said all the candidates are attempting to address working people's concerns, "so it's a bit disingenuous for McCain and Clinton to suddenly jump on what Obama is saying without getting to the substance of it."

link: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2008/04/17/2008-04-17_clinton_not_winning_over_undecided_super.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. It is strange. Clinton has to pull in the Undecided Supers to win and perhaps overturn
So hopefully this point will get her to stop this crap so we can return to debating the issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. The Supers can't be fooled, just like most of the American People
NOT THIS TIME!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. That's it exactly, SunsetDreams
The American voters and that includes the Superdelegates, see an opportunity to get past politics as usual. Hillary is running a campaign model of the past, where "got ya style" politics is at the core of the campaign. The republicans are going to make the same mistake this fall supporting John "W rerun" McCain.

Not this time - this time the people will vote for a real change.

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Of the remaining SD's uncommitted, 100 are elected reps.
Governors, Reps, and Senators. They have to get re-elected, so they will break for the one who has the people--Obama.

The other 218 are DNC and Democratic Party Leaders.

Obama only needs about 100 superdelegates to clinch it, based on projected outcomes of the last 10 contests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. Endgame. The supers get it
but HRC can't help but roll around in the gutter at the slightest opportunity. It's like an addiction she can't kick in this campaign.

Blowback, Backlash, Backfire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's not even about the supers at this point
the Clintons pretty much know who they can sway and who they can't at this point in the game. Right now they are just trying to make damn sure that Obama loses in the General so Hillary can come back in 2012 as the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. It's now or never for her.
If she can't win now, she'll never have a chance in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. It isn't even "now" for her.
She's trashed herself too much in the primary. If she ever was "electable," I don't think she is now. We've seen her ugly side. If Obama were to lose the general, and she ran in the 2012 primary, I don't think she'd ever be be frontrunner. Just IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. its amazing that after all this shit, she thinks we would even what
to look at her again. NEVER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. It goes to character and integrity of HRC and It's NOT good.
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. Now would be the time for a massive move towards Barack
especially after last night's "debate?" If that's what they're calling it.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. They should stand up and say, enough is enough.
Obama has held a statistically significant lead Nationally for over a week now.

I now see why he is not wanting to go through another debate in NC. That was pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. Barack is beating her nationally by 8.2%
What network is doing the NC debate. If it's ABC, Obama should tell them he's busy. Watching that last night was a disaster.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. It was scheduled for the 27th of April.
But, the venue wasn't decided and it is to be CBS.

I think Obama knew what was coming last night, because yesterday he said that he may not participate in the NC debate.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=108x129268
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
12. She's got nothing left. She admitted last night she thought Obama could win the GE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. That was her last argument.
She gave the Supers an out.

Her exact words to the question of whether Obama could beat mccain were: "Yes. Yes. Yes, yes, yes."

I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
13. Hillary gave away her one argument for the SDs to overturn the
will of the voters when she emphatically agreed that Obama could win against McCain.

If she's still making that argument behind closed doors to try to win over supers, then she's proving that the 60% who don't trust her have it right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Obama needs only 100 more Supers. Hillary needs 275+.
It's not gonna happen for her. 100 of the supers left are elected officials and have to think about being re-elected officials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
18. Flag pin question origin
Here's a website including info about the lady that asked the flag lapel pin question in the ABC debate, Nash McCabe. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/04/us/politics/04penn.html?fta=y
Turns out she was an Obama-hater all along. She claims that she just focuses on the fact that Obama doesn't wear a flag pin whenever she sees him. Keep in mind that this lady is recently unemployed. Commonsense would tell you she should worry about her job and not a flag pin. What an idiot.
Pass this info along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
19. Obama has 1/3 of the Democratic party saying they wont vote for him....
This is a very, very big problem for him. He really needs to start trying to control all the abuse and mudslinging done by his supporters, all in his name, if he want's to get Hillary's supporters to vote for him in November. If not he is toast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Once he is the Nominee, the healing will begin.
Hillary has her fair share to do, to bring us together, as well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Complete bullshit.
Those who say they won't vote him are doing so because they are bitter about their candidate being soundly rejected by the American people. They will either come around or they won't either way, Obama is a better choice then Hillary. The independents that will be gained by an Obama nomination will more then make up for the small percentage of Hillary crusaders who will vote for McCain or stay home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. those who say they are voting for him are full of shit. they HATE THIS
COUNTRY or they would help put the dem, ANY DEM in the white house. If Hilarity won the nod, I would vote. I would vomit but I would vote. anyone who stays out because they are putting themselves first HATE this country and this world. Fuck them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Race is a major factor. I love how these backward trailor trash people in these small towns try.....
to come up with all kinds of bullshit reasons not to vote for him. Until these morons are gone we will never progress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
25. K!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
26. Obama picked up two more Superdelegates today!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC