Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I Am Fully Convinced After Last Night....This Election Is About Corporations Vs. The People.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AllexxisF1 Donating Member (559 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:25 AM
Original message
I Am Fully Convinced After Last Night....This Election Is About Corporations Vs. The People.
We all have talked about this ongoing war between the American Middle Class vs. the Corporations for many years now and last night was clearly another shot across the bow from the Corporate GoodShip Lollipop.

I am convinced now more than ever that this election is about the Corporations strangle hold over this country vs US The People. With McCain, Hillary, the MSM and Corporations on one side and Obama on the other.

Last night was a picture perfect example of just how bad or worried they are of an Obama Presidency. A televised ambush of the worse sort that literally backfired on itself. Why? because the age of deception is peeling away. Americans en masse are not believing it anymore. Last night anyone with half a brain can see what had transpired, a direct assault on the candidate that is tied to no one being attacked by all who are.

Many Hillary supporters (our Fellow Democrats) have to understand that Barrack Obama is being completely bought out and funded by US, THE PEOPLE. That is a profound thing that has not happened for many decades and is a direct threat to those in power. Barack does not owe anything to anyone except US. We paid for him, we bought him out and as long as he does OUR BIDDING than we will continue to pay to keep him there. He does not need money from the oil companies, insurance companies, defense companies,...all the money he could ever need is from people who decide instead of going out to dinner decide to give that money to someone they trust to do their wishes.

For once a person can become President and do the will of the people without ever having to cater to the fat cats who have bought politicians since time and memorial. He can do what's right, be glorified and remembered for it, all the while knowing steadfast that THE PEOPLE have his back. What is going on is simply astounding in modern times, a true shift in the halls of power. Last nights faux debate showed that completely and utterly. It showed how scared they really are of our movement. They will stoop to nothing and they will do whatever they feel is necessary. Hillary has no mathematical chance of winning yet she simply is there to take him down because the people who paid for her campaign expect her to do that.


The main blessing of this election is not Barrack Obama but the internet and people like us behind it. Without the internet Obama would not have the funds (double of any candidate) to compete against those who are merely bought by big corporations. It is also the blessing of the internet that we can all can cut through the bullshit and expose lies for what they are, and more importantly expose the fake controversies.


I implore to all those here and especially to Hillary supporters that this is what the real election is about...Corporations vs Us and that Hillary is merely an agent for them, as is McCain, as is the MSM (with the exception of a few). Last night should have put the worst taste in the mouth of every American because it insulted our intelligence and more importantly our dignity.

It's time to fight back.

It's our time because We are the one's we have been waiting for.

We have bought our politician and he is going to be an extension of us.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Upfront Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well said.
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think that the division is quite that clear...
...but the corporations certainly made clear their choice of the two corporatists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is a great line. . .
". . .clearly another shot across the bow from the Corporate GoodShip Lollipop. . . "

and all too true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. Of course. It has been since the beginning. Thus, my fervent support for JRE
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 09:16 AM by Triana
until he dropped out. He would have been a strong fighter for the people. But the corprat-owned media knew that and so either ignored or lambasted him so as to oust him from the list of candidates to choose from - and it worked. They're likely doing the same thing now, to Obama. He's not corporate-friendly enough, as Hillary is.

PeeEss: "The People" need to wise up to the media (and ALL corporations) and their tactics and the reasons behind them. Shut them off, and vote the principles and issues only - watch a lot more CSPAN and a lot less ABC, etc. - and make up their own minds. The media can't control our choices unless we LET them. And - we do - as a collective - we do - we allow corporations to own the entire process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. Now all we have to do, is convince everyone else.
And the hardest ones to convince will be the property rights Libertarians, who don't realize that when they fight against EVERY city ordinance, they're just handing easy wins to development companies who continually enforce their rights over the will of the innocent homeowners. (As opposed to the complicit ones.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. K&R
Yes we can and yes we will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. K&R
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:47 AM
Original message
The corporations have already won.
All three of the candidates still in the race are handmaidens of the corporate class. No matter which one wins, the people lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
33. I don't see that honestly about Obama, not that he's perfect but his connections are a fraction of..
...Hillary's or McSames
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. Wall Street adores him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #36
77. Not in itself a bad thing---
The market generally goes up during Democratic administrations. Maybe some people on the Street have finally gotten a clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklnDem75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
37. If that's true...
Why is Hillary still running? They're all on the same side, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #37
41. Some people want power. Other people want to own those who have power. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
45. They are well ahead but the ball game ain't over. People in some South American
countries have already rebelled against Bechtel and other corporate giants that have tried to gain a monopoly on their water. There will be a point when we will rebel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-18-08 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
91. Sad but very true. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-18-08 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
94. Thank you.
Obama supporters seem to have forgotten that he AND Hillary were early on identified as the "corporate candidates."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
9. That's an insightful observation about Hillary's backers wanting her there not to win anymore, but
to take Obama down. I think there's some truth to that, frankly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. I knew it all along
It's been obvious from the get go that the Republicans want to run against Hillary. Not only that they think they can beat her but If they don't I think she's acceptable to the "powers that be" as she is owned by so many corporate interests and the MIC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
purji Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
12. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
13. Obama is beholden to the same interests. To believe otherwise is naive. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Perhaps, but the extent to which he is beholden is FAR LESS than
the extent to which Hillary and McCain have sold out to those interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #16
28. I think it's a fraction of that honestly, I don't see the direct corolation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
47. So it's okay to be just a bit corrupt? WTF?!
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #47
57. Excuse me. We have three choices. Although we on DU have two.
What do you want from me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #47
59. god, i hate simplistic manichean crap
look, taking lobbyist money does not de facto mean that a politician is corrupt. Bernie Sanders takes lobbyist money. Does he cave to industry? Do you consider him corrupt?

http://www.opencongress.org/people/show/400357_bernard_sanders
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DerekJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
50. Well, of course!! Business if the backbone of any country.. When you elevate the interest of
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 12:33 PM by DerekJ
business over the interest of the country, and middle class citizens, you then have problem. Obama most likely won't do that.
Why?! Because he owes them zilch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
14. Concur 100% - When Net Neutrality Goes, there won't be another chance
quite possibly

This is it... Obama may be a mildly progressive centrist... a reasonable, coalition building, sort of guy...

but THIS IS a Revolution, and we have to think of it as such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
15. MSM makes tons of money by keeping the polls tight and race going.
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 09:55 AM by Bensthename
The longer this goes on the more millions they make.. They don't care about us. They have stock holders and profits to make. And huge mansions and cars to keep up. Very sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TragedyandHope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
17. Let's be honest, Obama is not an anti-corporate candidate
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 10:54 AM by TragedyandHope
If he was, he wouldn't be a serious contender in the race, let alone the overwhelming favorite to be our next POTUS.

Last night was a travesty of a certain network trying to force their will into reality, but it back-fired. That said, let's not fool ourselves into thinking Obama doesn't have friends in high places.

I believe Obama has honest intentions and will do his best as President to make things better for everyone in this country, but he isn't an anti-corporate crusader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. You missed the point. It isn't about Obama. It is about us and OUR movement.
We made Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TragedyandHope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. I agree 100% with you on that, but I don't believe in magic
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 11:07 AM by TragedyandHope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. There is nothing magical about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TragedyandHope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #29
35. In other words
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 11:17 AM by TragedyandHope
I think even with the best intentions Obama will be hard pressed to accomplish even a fraction of what we as his supporters would have him do. I think he will make incremental progress in the right direction, but his arms will be tied by the entrenched system in Washington and the economic power and political influence wielded by the corporations. Not to mention, having to deal with the inherited disaster from the aftermath of 8 years of Bush.

I'm proud to be a part of this historic movement, but I have very modest expectations and real doubts about the true extent our influence.

I would love to be proved wrong.

I fully expect Obama to be our next President, but that alone won't convince me. I have an open mind, but my experience has led me to be a pessimist and a realist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #35
44. I hear you. Normally I would agree 100%
But consider this:

-The country shifted so radically in the last 7 years. With an idiot at the helm. No one expected it.

-Every action creates an equal and opposite reaction.

-There is a big swing coming. We've given Obama a huge cudgel. If he wins, it will be an unprecedented mandate from the people.

He'll use it. He's very good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #23
30. No candidate can be far removed from the stench of corporations because ANYONE can contribute to a..
...campaign.

The candidates don't have control over that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
18. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
19. Perfect. Absolutely perfect post. Right on. K&R x 1,000,000!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
21. I place a LOT more blame for this stupid ass'd war on the media after last night. They HAVE NOT...
...changed the mindset that got us into that war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
22. What's Clinton's stance on Media Deregulation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. What ever Rove wants...I'm sooooo disappointed in her.
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 11:05 AM by uponit7771
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
24. This Election Is About Corporations Vs. The People? -> (as usual?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
26. Noticeably absent: any questions about corporate greed and malfeasance
Subprime mortgage crisis and the deregulation of the banking industry? Oil company profits? Insurance company practices that exclude people from the health care system? Pharmaceutical industry's price gouging? Obscene CEO pay?

ABC knows who their masters are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #26
31. StephADickLess and Grubson might like getting whipped every now and then
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emillereid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
27. My thoughts exactly - I got up this morning livid that the powers that be are in
a frenzy with the realization that the "black guy, who doesn't need corporate money" might actually win. They will pull out all stops to bring him down. ABC was only the front for what I believe is a much larger effort to stop him.

We must re-double our efforts and fight back. GIVE ALL THE TIME AND MONEY YOU CAN! IT'S TIME TO TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-18-08 03:47 AM
Response to Reply #27
95. For the love of God, this is not a race issue.
Get a damn grip. I'm black and I don't see things that way. He's the front-runner now. Front runners always get attacked. Sheesh. What the hell...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
32. Yup. Clinton joining in with the VRWC should tell us all we need to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
34. K&R!!!
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 11:10 AM by backscatter712
The fascist spell we've been under is unraveling!

It used to be that the media could pull a stunt like this, and hardly anyone would say anything, or even notice.

Now look what's happening. Obama's proven to be the fascist's worst nightmare - a candidate with mainstream appeal, with a lot of charisma, with intelligence, who talks to the people like adults instead of slinging slogans and placations, who has shown he intends to work for the people rather than the corporatists and the authoritarian right.

The people have embraced him because they're waking up - they realize their country has been taken by tyrants and thieves and robber barons, and they want their country BACK. And the old tactics of wedge-issue division and propaganda and bread and circuses aren't working anymore.

The real bigwigs - oil executives, other corporate executives, along with Bush, Cheney and the entire pack of cronies, are not just looking at losing power, they're looking at PRISON! They're looking at losing EVERYTHING! They know that Obama is a man who believes in the Constitution, who in fact taught Constitutional law, who works for the people, and will bring back core governmental concepts like separation of powers, checks and balances, and rule of law. And when that happens, justice will come for them.

They're scared shitless, and the stunt by ABC last night shows how desperate and how scared they are.

Watch your back, Obama, and watch your backs, Democrats. These thugs think nothing about committing acts of murder to gain political power. The next stunt the fascists may pull may be a violent one...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
38. Hillary is bought and paid for by Wall St.
To be fair, Wall St. has invested in Obama too.

But Obama is much more of a break from the Oligarchs than Hillary.

She will sell us out easily if she is ever elected.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #38
48. Wall Street may have tried to invest in Obama.
But Wall Street got outbid - by US!!!

We're the ones who've given the most to Obama's campaign, and I don't think Obama would have it any other way. He's not the kind that would let himself be bought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
39. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
40. Edwards supporters have believed that all along
but the remaining candidates are both firmly supported by big money corporations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-18-08 03:49 AM
Response to Reply #40
96. Thank you for saying it.
These folks are so out of touch with reality that I'm amazed. I may now be supporting Hillary, but I'm ever aware of the fact that both she, Obama, and McCain are the corporate choice. Let's not forget that Edwards was the favorite on this once united and progressive board. Now most of DU has settled for one of two corporatist. But let's at least be honest and call them as we see them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
42. You nailed it -- great post!
I believe that this is a battle of good v. evil of mythic proportions. The tables of the money changers have been overturned in the temple, and NOTHING could be more threatening to the status quo. As such, these are very dangerous times for all stake-holders.

As I have said before in this forum, Obama is a genuine threat to the corporate over-class; Hillary was their ace in the hole, their way of stacking the deck in their favor. Because of this, I could never vote for Hillary. If the "choice" is between two corporate sell-outs, I must refuse to rubber-stamp a one party system, even if one of them MIGHT, if (s)elected, throw us a few crumbs.

We are still citizens, not subjects -- let us not be blackmailed. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
43. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
46. BINGO. you nailed it. and We are mad as hell and aint goin take it anymore. k&r nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
49. Are you kidding me? Obama is a corporatist too! Wake up and smell the corruption!
There is NO-REPEAT NO-difference between the 3 candidates.

They ALL serve their corporate masters.

Jeez-It is ever more clear that people around DU are in deep denial. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllexxisF1 Donating Member (559 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. If...Obama has little over 1% of corporate..
If Obama has little over 1% of corporate contributions compared to the overwhelming amount provided by people like us ....how in the world is he a corporate lackey.


I started this thread because I honestly believe a shift has taken place. Obama does not owe anyone but us ...THE PEOPLE. To add to that I believe his charisma will wash over the established people on the hill that if they work with him they will be helped by US too, without the need of corporate money.

This is our chance, whether slim or not ...it is our best chance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. Obama is NOT John Edwards. Obama has stolen Edwards platform while taking corporate money.
While Edwards took NO corporate money.

Don't fool yourself, Obama is playing both sides. :puke:

p.s. Charisma? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guyanakoolaid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #55
61. Yeah, playing both sides while denying a single PAC or lobbyist dollar.
:eyes:

Edwards was more than eager during the debates to frame both he and Obama and the candidates of change while rightly labeling Hillary the corporate wh-, uhm money-grabber that she is.

It's more than a little disingenuous to label all contributions of individuals who work for a corporation a "corporate" donation, too.

Who has taken more lobbyist money than any other candidate of either party? Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-18-08 03:53 AM
Response to Reply #61
98. Get real already!
Edited on Fri Apr-18-08 03:55 AM by Stand and Fight
Barack Obama is no less guilty because he has taken less money than Hillary from the corporations. Let's not forget that he only STOPPED taking money from them upon deciding to run for president. He's playing both sides -- just like they all are. It's politics and it's ugly and nasty. However, for now it is the way the game is played.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-18-08 03:52 AM
Response to Reply #55
97. Take them to task!
This board has really gone off the deep end in its abysmal failure to call a spade a spade. They're so taken up with this immature idea that someone is going to "save us" that they're failing to see the fucking forest for the trees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-18-08 04:28 AM
Response to Reply #97
100. Couldn't have said it better myself.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chknltl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #49
63. I tend to agree strongly with the OP but I am open minded.
I say this because I am under the impression that the Military Industrial Complex would be happier with McCain and perhaps close to equally happy with Clinton and have no interest in Obama whatever.

Can you perhaps back up this assertion that there is 'NO-REPEAT NO' difference between the three candidates 'corporate masters'? Again, I am open minded enough to be willing to entertain your assertion but I would like to see your evidence, could you direct me to links or present me with data that may sway my thinking?

I am in agreement with the OP because I feel that We The People perceive Obama as a pendulum swing back toward democracy and away from business as usual. Corporatism or unrestricted capitalism is the particular demon which is biting us. We The People feel the biting in our collective wallets but I don't think that the electorate is aware that this is the actual demon doing the biting....they just want it stopped.

I think We The People perceive McCain as more business as usual, his corporate tax cut proposals CLEARLY demonstrate this although again, I doubt the masses within the electorate understand how this further feeds the demon!

I think that We The People may perceive Clinton similarly because she uses, (since falling behind), campaign tactics that bear a strong resemblance to what the neo-cons would use. The fact that We The People are strongly wanting change and not more business as usual has caused, by and large, a turn-off towards Clinton within the electorate.

So far Obama has not presented the face of BUSINESS AS USUAL to the electorate, he runs on the promise of CHANGE. That particular combination has made him the champion of We The People and keeps him there. Fueled by all the new voter turn-out (who also want change from business as usual), Obama surges ahead of the pack and will likely be our President.

So if you would be so kind, would you show us what it is that we do not see...whatever it is Obama is hiding from the electorate...those very things that make him the same corporate lackey that McCain truly is and Clinton may be as well? Will you show us how Obama will be more beholding to those corporate masters than to We The People and will be this way equally to McCain or Clinton? Here is your chance to change DU opinion, to prove that America's democracy is indeed DEAD and that We The People cling to a false HOPE.

I swear, no flames here from this Obama supporter, I am being open-minded with this request but I won't hide my skepticism either.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
52. Did you notice how the cameras cut to the big whigs during the capital gains tax
question? They looked uncomfortable. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
53. Welcome to Enlightment...I've been
convinced as of the last 8 years and it's not going away.

As I've had in my "comment" it's the mediawhores we have to bring down..without them there would be no bush or the War on Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
54. And this is what many can't see...
they are stuck on the same old game that the republiCONS play every election cycle they have really been choosing our candidates due to the ill informed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daphne08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
56. Exactly! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
58. Oh my
Looks like a lot of people are in for a nasty shock.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
60. That is very much what this election is about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tribetime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
62. your 100% right
I was wondering when they were going to start this shit. We have to stand up and say NOT THIS FUCKING TIME...K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chknltl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
64. Until shown otherwise, I agree with you Alexxis F1.
I hate recommending a thread just as I start looking through the DU threads but in this case you have written something I feel is VERY important. You have had a couple of detractors to your assertion but by and large it appears to me that quite a few of our fellow DUers are in agreement with you, as am I. Thank you for this piece, it made me think. RECOMMENDED
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllexxisF1 Donating Member (559 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #64
67. Thank you very much :-).
I truly believe that we are at a crossroads in this country. We have found our chance and in that chance we have found that those in power no longer have the luxury of 10 second snip bits that overwhelm the majority. The internet and especially You Tube has changed that. We changed that.

The right wing and the corporations can own the radio waves and the tv channels but they cannot silence the multitudes online.

I am a Network Administrator by trade and I am incredibly humbled knowing that my profession makes an impact that can possibly save our country and this world.


We must let people know and especially Obama himself that he is there because of us, paid for by us, championed because of us to do the work we expect him to do for us.


Hillary supporters I beg you to see this fight for what it really is. Last night should have been an eye opener and be laid bare that Corporations are truly frightened.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chknltl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #67
76. and again my agreements.
Obama IS where he is because of us. Perhaps he needs a reminder of this, perhaps no. I sense in him something quite special. I sense in him the very change American democracy needs if it is to survive it's out of control capitalists. (I am NOT against capitalism, but I do believe it MUST be controlled lest it destroy the democracy it operates within). True democracy is the the will of the majority, sadly capitalism has usurped this in America through the buying off of our representatives. They will try to do the same with Obama, (some, I hear already have), but just perhaps in Obama, We The People may have gotten to him before he has become as corrupted by their $$ as his challengers have. I have a request in to one of the naysayers in this thread to show me where I am in error regarding this...but I shall not be holding my breath.

It would be nice if the Clinton supporters would look to the bigger picture regarding this. Her campaign IS causing damage to Obama at this point. Also, as Rachel Maddow points out: Each day that the fight between Clinton and Obama goes on is a free pass for McCain and adds to his chances for beating Obama. Seeing McCain in the White House is utterly NOT an option, seeing another corporatist tool in the White House is only slightly better than McCain imo. Seeing someone who has so few corporate attachments AND has so much of the hopes of an uncynical electorate pinned to him...well that fills me with a great deal of HOPE at any rate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1trackmindGOP Donating Member (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
65. Exactly and that is why we MUST Win!
They will smear, lie, and drum up scandals, we must stick to our guns and better sense and vote for ourselves this time...let us not get swift boated again! Yes WE can!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brindis_desala Donating Member (866 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
66. Now That's the Truth. You GET it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
68. Someone said they can't shut the net down too as we can rewire it as it is just digital noise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TML Donating Member (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
69. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
70. Because Hillary supporters are NOT people?
You really have some fucking nerve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
71. That's right.....we can win this, but it will take each and everyone of us......
no sitting on laurels thinking everyone else is doing the hard work. We all must do it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
72. You just now noticed? You didnt see anything wrong with what they did to Edwards?
Or Kerry? Or Gore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
73. Obama takes millions from lobbyists---in states--but these are national companies
He just makes sure they funnel it through their state offices so that he can pretend he does not get it through a DC office. AT&T can send money to Sacramento to send it to Obama. They know how to wire money. It is real easy.

Wise up. Obama and Hillary are both corporate candidates. I have been telling you for months that they MSM would come for Obama last after Edwards and Hillary because he is the designated McGovern this election---as in the RNC intends him to lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
74. IT'S THE CORPORATIONS, STUPID! You hit the nail on the head. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
75. The new president's first day
there is a comedian who did a rant -- maybe someone has seen it, but I can't remember his name -- and it went along the lines of:

On a new president's first full day in office, a couple of men in black suits come into the oval office and take him to a small room in the basement of the White House. There, they show him the films of what really happened to JFK, RFK and MLK. Then, they ask "Any questions?" He doesn't have any questions. And they say, "Good, then you'll do what you're told."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bongo Prophet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #75
86. That was the late, great, Bill Hicks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-18-08 03:58 AM
Response to Reply #75
99. Shit. May be comedy, but it has a strange "ring of truth" to it.
Bill Hicks, eh? I'll have to research this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
78. Nearly a cartoon caricature of a debate~
It actually would have looked better as a cartoon---"Hahahahaha, now for the REAL debate folks!!"
I am in total awe that the corporate media has grown so crass, overconfident and---the real clincher was to watch that debacle with the backdrop of
"We The People..." in the background.....ooooooooooh the nerve of them!!! How dare they insult us in this way! I feel like I have been slapped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
79. if anyone can post here proof that Obama doesn't have similar relationships I'd love to know it
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
80. Obama seems to have the least amount of corporate
ties, Ms. Clinton is very well connected, and McCain unquestioningly has the most. I would be surprised if any politician lacked corporate connections of any kind, they are rare animals indeed. Kucinich was one of them I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
81. If Corporations Believed An Obama Presidency Would Be Hostile To Their Interests, He Wouldn't
Stand a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #81
83. Which is why he is the straw man in this election cycle...
Just as Wes Clark was in the last one.
Gee, what ever happened to old Wes anyway?
My guess is that he was rewarded with a nice CEO position
in yet another corporate multi national.

BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #83
84. Sure enough! Viaspace!
http://www.freshnews.com/news/defense-west/article_30671.html

Yet another military defense company!

Wanna stock tip?
Invest in this one.

BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-18-08 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #81
92. Very true. Ultimately, they decide on the candidates
Here on DU Gore was the one until he made it clear that he wasn't running. Then Kucinich was "The one", when he dropped out it was Edwards....this was also the trend among Dems nationally, yet look at what we are left with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
82. Bottom line
-they have to toe the line, but they do have a certain amount of power and influence. For me it boils down to trust and character under duress. I have to keep reminding myself that we are actually a fascist state, according to the laws now on the books, and it is yet to be seen how the next president will handle these draconian laws. McCain would run with it, no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downtown Hound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
85. Damn straight! K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
87. True words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
88. More than anything, Obama represents OUR OPPORTUNITY...
...to take our nation back.

CUNY Professor Frances Fox Piven on a recent Democracy Now!:

You know, in 1932, FDR didn’t run with a good program; he ran with the same program the Democrats had run with in 1924 and 1928, and that wasn’t a good program. But nevertheless, his rhetoric encouraged people who were suffering as a result of the Depression—working people, the unemployed—and helped to fuel the movements, which then forced FDR to support initiatives which he otherwise would not have supported, including the right to organize...

http://www.democracynow.org/2008/2/6/super_tuesday_roundtable_with_bill_fletcher

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yes We Did Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
89. Obama is the People's candidate... Clinton is the corporation's candidate. Wake up, people!
Look at all the people you see her with...Establishment types. Old money. Corporate money. Bundled money. Oil money. Republican money.

Obama's campaign is funded by the people. Some of these people may work for corporations but they understand that they can't sit at the table just because they donate because it's not pac money, fee money.

The firm that handles Clinton's campaign handles John McCain's campaign. The Established Dem and the Republican are working together no matter what they say. They want to get rid of the PRO-People candidate because he will change Washington forever. He will be there for 8 years. If you are for people powered politics and you believe in the "We" in the U.S. then drop Clinton because she will keep Washington as is while only bringing the deficit down and as for her Universal Healthcare proposal... it's a rouse. If you take pac money from lobbyists in the Medical industry then they will have a seat at the table and they will always make sure they are well taken care of.

When are people going to get this!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lutefisk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-18-08 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
90. Well said. Obama is forcing the corporate interests to expose themselves
It was supposed to be all over in February, but Obama messed up the plan.

Now, the various corporate interests, especially the corporate media, are forced to fight out in the open to protect their interests and destroy the threat (Obama). It's ugly, but good, to see them out in the open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-18-08 03:42 AM
Response to Original message
93. I was in agreement with you until you said Obama on the other side.
No, he's on the same side with McCain, Hillary, the corporations and the media.

The one candidate that was truly for the working class was on Colbert tonight and he's "suspended" his campaign. If we're going to fight back, we need someone who has taken them on and is willing to continue to take them on no matter what. That man is John Edwards. Not Barack Obama. Not Hillary Clinton. And certainly not John McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC