BL611
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-17-08 02:03 PM
Original message |
Because it doesn't matter! |
|
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 02:10 PM by BL611
The problem with the criticism's of Obama are that none of them are in the slightest bit relevant to his personal views nor his ability to be President
Do you think he is a black supremacist?
Do you think he hates America?
Do you think is a member of terrorist organization (either foreign or domestic, since both have been in implied)?
Do you think he is disdainful of churches?
Unless you've answered yes to one or more of these questions (in which case-and there's really no nice way to say this-you're fuckin nuts)than none of the recent "controversies" are in the slightest bit relevant. "Snipergate" while I also think was overdone,at the very least was relevant to Hillary's experience, which is what she's running on. What does playing six degrees of separation with Obama have to do with anything? Do you have evidence that he agrees politically with Wright or Ayers and more than (as he said) Tom Coburn? No? Than it makes no difference, and you are simply slandering a candidate on the basis of association. Everyone knows the argument he was making in the SF remarks- was it said gracefully? No. Was he completely right? Probably not 100%. Does he want to take away all of the guns and churches in small towns? Once again, if you answer yes, you are fuckin nuts.If the Republicans want to run on Obama's bitterness remarks and therefore argue the converse (that everyone is happy and everything is A-OK)more power to them. This is not giving Obama a "vetting," anymore than asking Hillary Clinton about Vince Foster or any of the other crazy Anti-Clinton shit -that as Charles Gibson likes to say is "all over the internet" therefore making it worthy of serious discussion (why didn't they ask Obama if Bush did 9/11?)-would be a "vetting." It's superfluous garbage, that should be evident to anyone, no matter what candidate they support.
|
patrice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-17-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Like he said several months ago: Why would he be weak on defense? Do you think he's going to let |
|
someone harm his own family?
It's just insanely stupid to think Democrats are weak on defense.
|
BL611
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-17-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
member of Al Queda, the Nation of Islam, a radical separtist black church, the Weather underground, and the Snobby Harverd Liberal Lawyers Club (SNLLC). Man, I don't know where he finds the time to be a Sentaor and write books...
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 12th 2024, 07:03 AM
Response to Original message |