Nia Zuri
(576 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-17-08 03:25 PM
Original message |
Were the debates a set up for a theft? |
|
Were the debates intended to provide cover for stealing PA and making it a +20 point blowout for Hillary. They will be able to point to Obama's "weak performance" and the bitter gate controversy as a smoke screen for Hillary's late surge despite the narrowing of the polls in the week leading up to the voting. Can't you just see the story? "PA is a game changer, Clinton now has momentum" etc. etc. Isn't Bill on the board of the co-sponsor (Constitutional Center, soemthingor other) of the debate. "Bloody him up real good George..."
|
JMDEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-17-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message |
|
To steal votes, you first put up a smokescreen to hide the vote theft behind.
|
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-17-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. Yep - like the corpmedia put up swifts nonstop for 3 months after they were proven to be liars. |
Mags
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-17-08 03:35 PM
Response to Original message |
2. You BO folks have finally lost your minds. He can lose without any help |
|
he is not God. Get that thru your heads.
|
Nia Zuri
(576 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-17-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Not that he wouldn't lose, but Clinton needs a blow out. |
|
this sets it up for a "blow-out"
|
PoliticalAmazon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-17-08 07:07 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Absolutely. It was so blatant it is an insult to viewers. n/t |
crankychatter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-17-08 07:10 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Greg Palast is lurking in Pennsylvania |
|
the truth "will out"
just possibly, not soon enough
|
backscatter712
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-17-08 07:20 PM
Response to Original message |
7. On the bright side, ABC horribly over-hammed their performance. |
|
It's obvious to any person with enough neurons to make a synapse that this debate was rigged. ABC didn't even try to be subtle about it.
So any right-wing shill's attempt to explain a theft by saying "Obama fumbled the debate." is going to be obvious bullshit and likely to be loudly challenged.
Watch this election like a hawk! And for the love of god, if a theft is suspected, challenge it and fight it to the fucking death.
|
depakid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-17-08 07:23 PM
Response to Original message |
|
This is getting absurd.
Meta-meta-manipulation.....
|
cliffordu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-17-08 07:23 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Yes. That was as transparent an attempted felony theft as there is. |
knixphan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-17-08 07:24 PM
Response to Original message |
10. we just have to break into th enews cycle |
|
by giving Barack a RECORD donation amount.
|
Two Americas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-17-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Rove got ABC to manipulate the debate, to give the impression that Obama did poorly, so that when his agents rig the vote across Pennsylvania - in order to help Clinton - then people won't be suspicious.
Now, the question that needs to be asked - and that tells us just how insane the campaign season has become: do I need a sarcasm smiley? Hard to say, isn't it?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:12 PM
Response to Original message |