Will we see a "Sen. Clinton, did you kill Vince Foster?" question at the next debate?

[Unsane]

Such a question would be comparable to the types of questions whores Gibson and Snuffolufogous asked Mr. Obama last night.

[sniffa]

1. *DING*

:popcorn:

[Mags]

6. down to pond scum , out of desperation and panic.

[sniffa]

9. Ooh, it seems someone wants to share my popcorn.

Get your own bag!

[rinsd]

2. Obama "supporter" response to MSM duplicity

Hey MSM direct your duplicity at different Democrat!

:puke:

[Unsane]

3. um, what?

could you make any LESS sense?

[rinsd]

13. I'll type slowly so you can understand.

You are angry at the treatment of Obama at the hands of MSM.

So in response you call for the MSM to treat another Democrat in that shoddy fashion.

Not McCain, another Democrat.

Goes with your fake ass Obama "support" that amounts to little more than starting flamebait threads.

[Unsane]

24. And yet Hillary would rather attack Obama, another democrat, instead of McCain!

NEXT

[rodeodance]

31. Obama and his fans attack Hillary, the Democratic all the time. What a hypocrite you are.

[Unsane]

40. What, Mr. Ignored? Can't hear you

lol

[mrreowwr_kittty]

17. You might have a point had Hillary not decided to join in on it last night.

Obama took the high road on Sniper Gate, while she didn't on him.

She deserves whatever she gets at this point.

[Hieronymus]

25. What a phony picture of Hillary .. she never looked that good.

[Mags]

4. desperate much...

[DJ13]

5. There wont BE a "next debate" for Hillary

Its over, that was her last shot.

[Starbucks Anarchist]

8. Maybe this debate was like a mulligan for her.

[SoCalDem]

14. NO MORE DEBATES... (Not with HER in them, anyway) n/t

[Rosa Luxemburg]

15. yeah that was her last debate

[LaurenG]

7. OMG I hope not. You know we may have to eat all of our words.

I am not certain of who the nominee will be but we all need to stop thinking in terms of payback.

It's devastating to think that senator Clinton could be our nominee and we have helped the neocons by giving them timber for the fire. The same goes for those who oppose Senator Obama. He may be our nominee. We ought to think about toning it down. Hate is really not helping anything here.

[Unsane]

12. Oh I agree.

The media wants the hate to continue, however. Hench last night's questions.

[Vinca]

19. You think we have to give the Republicans a heads up on

Vince Foster? Somehow I think they've got that one covered and ready to go, right along with every other Clinton scandal. The centerpiece of the campaign would be Bill, not Hillary. It would amount to whether voters think he deserves to be anywhere near the White House again. Why else do you think McBush has told his campaign to go "hands off" on Hillary? She's a sure thing.

[LaurenG]

21. They see how ugly this is and will try to use it as a wedge

I just feel like whatever happens will happen without me adding anymore negativity to the already overwhelming amount we have.

[SoCalDem]

10. "Some people say" you & your husband killed many people.. her reply?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpxgpRElRgQ

[marshall]

11. There is so much shit that could be slung at Hillary

If Obama wanted to get down and dirty he could run her into the ground and have Bill read faced and finger pointing himself into a fit.

[redqueen]

16. We won't... but yeah, that'd be comparable.

They should also ask her about her husband's speaking fees from the Colombia trade agreement promoters. :)

[Evergreen Emerald]

18. Baloney. Clinton was attacked at several debates and you all cheered and

said we were whiners and she had to just buck up and take it.

The double standard here is amazing. And it is actually so funny that you do not see it.

[TahitiNut]

23. Clinton got more air time, fielding softballs, than the bottom 3-4 candidates combined

... in the first few debates. Have you forgotten the "Dodd clock"?? To whine about the incredible imbalance given to the 6-8 candidates, with Clinton getting the lion's share by far, is the epitome of pathological dissatisfaction.

Good grief!

[Evergreen Emerald]

33. Yes. I remember the Dodd clock. Clinton was attacked NON STOP

Good grief? How quickly you forget the pile-on debate with Russert.

In this debate, Obama was getting most of the air time. Remember? The moderator was talking about it.

Pathological dissatisfaction: that is when Clinton is attacked and you cheer because the media is being so unfair in attacking her, but cry and whine when Obama is not revered and handled with kid gloves.

I guess it would not be so bad here on DU if you would just admit the reality that you do not care if the media is unfair and biased and nothing but propaganda, as long as it serves your candidate.

But to pretend the attacks on Clinton did not occur, while moaning and twirling in anger over Obama not being treated with kid gloves, is simply amazing. It reduces the credibility of all of you.

[Name removed]

36. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Evergreen Emerald]

39. I do not understand your post

[Hugabear]

20. Reminds me of this quote from the movie "Blue Chips"

"How long are you gonna keep this bullshit up,Ed? Huh? You know goddamn well there was no such incident. There was an alleged incident which you invented. In the same way that if I assert that you sleep with sheep,than it is alleged that you sleep with sheep."

[tularetom]

22. Hopefully there won't be anymore debates

but there were my guess would be a resounding fuck no.

[Zodiak]

26. I would certainly hope not.

Bullshit questions have no place in these debates. That goes for everything asked in the first 45 minutes, INCLUDING the sniper question. This crap has all been beaten to death in the media already and has no bearing on anything that affect the lives of Americans.

Unbelievable what horrible tactics people will defend in the media just because it temporarily benefits their political position. That goes for both sides.

The media serves the pukes, not Democrats...and that goes for ALL Democrats. Just because the wurlitzer is playing your tune doesn't mean that the hand that giveth cannot taketh away. The media has always been our enemy.

[rinsd]

30. Hear fucking hear!

Unbelievable what horrible tactics people will defend in the media just because it temporarily benefits their political position. That goes for both sides.

The media serves the pukes, not Democrats...and that goes for ALL Democrats. Just because the wurlitzer is playing your tune doesn't mean that the hand that giveth cannot taketh away. The media has always been our enemy.

[LaurenG]

37. Thanks and I sure wish we could rec posts instead of just threads!

:hi:

[Zodiak]

38. Thanks

I rarely start threads. Maybe 8 or so since I've been on DU (4 years).

[Crunchy Frog]

27. If by some miracle she gets the nomination

you can be damned sure we will.

[PBS Poll-435]

32. Cuz you want McCain to win?

[Crunchy Frog]

41. Uh, where in the hell did you get that from my post?

Do all Hillary supporters have this much difficulty with the English language?

[PBS Poll-435]

44. ...

I realize now that it could be taken two different ways.

1. RW pushes issue into campaign coverage.

2. Obama supporters push issue into campaign coverage.

[MNDemNY]

28. They didn't even mention COCAINE.

[rodeodance]

29. You and RW will bring it . Can't tell the difference anymore.

[Auntie Bush]

34. In what way are they comparable?

One is RW speculation and been proven in the courts that is false. So typical of Obama supporters. Lie, lie. lie your ass off and they call it truth. Such BS!

Everything they asked Obama and Hillary were about actual things that have happened recently. You should be ashamed to call yourself a loyal Democrat
when you post sh** like that. Despicable!

[pinkpops]

42. Actually I believe the point is that ABC's "reasoning" behind

the questions asked in the first hour or so was that they were asking questions that the Republicans would ask of the Democratic nominee. I personally believe they were trying to be as "hard" on Clinton as they were on Obama. If the candidates themselves wanted to take that tact against each other I could go along with it. But that is not the job of the "moderators".

As to the question posed at the top of the thread, I do believe it is one likely to be brought up by agents of the Republicans - that is the kind of crap they like to do, and truth will have nothing to do with it.

[Submariner]

35. That was Hillary's last debate for president ever

so she went out with a bang. She'll never get a chance to field any other questions.

[Unsane]

45. From your lips to Zeus' ears

[Freida5]

43. Then you have to ask if the choir director at Trinity was killed because of the obama campaign

[JoFerret]

46. What?

.

[FrenchieCat]

47. Well why don't you fill us in.

One our our Deacons got shot in the parking lot of my church a few weeks back. Does that mean I have a problem? My church is in East Oakland, which is comparable to the neighborhood of Trinity. We have 5,000 members. Should I check the calendar to see where I was on that day?