Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What people don't seem to understand is that last night's debate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Rob Gregory Browne Donating Member (333 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:37 PM
Original message
What people don't seem to understand is that last night's debate
doesn't matter. Obama has already won this thing and only a complete disaster will ruin for him. Hillary's clinging to a dead dream and the press loves drama.

As I said with Wright-gate and Bitter-gate, it's all much ado about nothing. Obama is our next President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hope you're right; I'll be biting my nails til November. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reflection Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Can you imagine the shockwaves
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 07:50 PM by reflection
through both the country and the world if/when he defeats McCain? I personally think it could be one of America's shining moments, a complete repudiation of the last 8 years, with a dismissal of the inherent racism in our presidential politics thrown in for good measure.

Were Hillary to somehow win (I can't imagine how, but that doesn't mean it's not possible), a similar effect would occur. You can argue about how she won and all that, but the fact that we would have a female president would also be phenomenal for our standing in the eyes of the world. The arguing would die down as soon as her cabinet was selected and her policies started to be installed.

For the first time, we are tantalizingly close to this seismic shift. I for one would like to see it happen, one way or the other. I believe either result would bridge the current trust gap between us and the rest of the world.

It's gonna be a hell of a party or a hell of a hangover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Get ready for the HRC talking points for the day...
"So you don't think the rest of the Democrats should have a chance to vote?
You don't seem to believe in Democracy. In fact, you don't sound like a real Democrat."

This is what I'm hearing the HilLIARy people saying today whenever they are told their 'girl' can't win... and has in fact already lost. It gets boring.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rob Gregory Browne Donating Member (333 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-18-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. HA. I'd counter with the simple fact that
in a primary, few people actually get to vote before the nominee is decided. Just look at the Republican side for that. Has everyone voted for McCain? Or 2004, when Kerry locked up the nomination pretty quickly after the MSM attack on Dean.

I lived in Hawaii for most of my life and our vote rarely counted in the primary OR the general. Were we disenfranchised?

All of us, both Hillary and Obama supporters, have to realize that this is how the system works. I know that some will be sorely disappointed that their candidate didn't prevail, but REAL Democrats suck it up and move forward.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. The only notable thing I heard was when Hillary went so far right with her war with Iran remark....
that I think she went past Bush on her way. No wonder she voted for the Iran resolution. If this isn't an extreme right position, I don't know what is.

Why are we the ones to have to go to war for other countries? I don't get it. It isn't like we just got out of WW2 and want to backup all those countries involved with that one. So what gives with the "world police" stance? Who gave us the right to do this? :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian_rd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. You accuse her of "clinging"? That means you're an elitist, a hater of women, and ...
... wait for it ... a gang-rapist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC