NMDemDist2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-26-04 07:12 PM
Original message |
"Nader's Dubious Raiders" by By Max Blumenthal |
|
Edited on Sat Jun-26-04 07:12 PM by AZDemDist6
snip In its effort to get on the ballot in the key battleground state of Arizona, the Prospect has learned, the Nader campaign hired a petition company that is also gathering signatures for a draconian anti-immigrant initiative pushed by right-wing elements in the state. The initiative, called Protect Arizona Now (PAN), would restrict access to public services by undocumented immigrants.
In addition, according to several sources, the Nader campaign was assisted in its petition drive by an unlikely figure: the ultra-conservative former executive director of the Arizona Republican Party, Nathan Sproul. Sources say Sproul -- who is also spearheading an initiative to block public funding from political campaigns in the state -- made payments to the petition contractors working on his public-funding initiative to gather signatures for Nader as well.
Moreover, according to several sources, the signature-gathering drive for PAN is mostly funded by the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), a Washington-based anti-immigrant group that has spent tens of millions in the last two decades to roll back the rights of both legal and illegal immigrants living in the United States.
The Arizona ballot drive was never the grassroots effort that Nader characterizes his campaign as. In trying to garner the 14,694 signatures necessary to get on the Arizona ballot, the Nader campaign first unsuccessfully solicited a Republican consulting firm to handle its ballot-qualification bid. This spring, as droves of professional petitioners descended on Arizona like traveling carnival folk to gather signatures for PAN -- and to collect the $2–4 that a petitioner is awarded for each signature delivered -- they also presented signatories with the Nader petition, according to several sources. This petition piggybacking helped Nader get more than the amount of signatures he needed to qualify for the ballot -- most of them from Republicans. In fact, according to a volunteer for the Arizona Democratic Party who has reviewed Nader's signatures, of the more than 21,000 signatures Nader garnered, a whopping 65 percent percent came from Republicans, compared to 18 percent from Democrats.
more here http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=7954:mad:
|
mzmolly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-26-04 07:44 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I heard less then 40% of the signatures were even valid. |
|
That's why the Dems are contesting it. They fudged the names!
|
NMDemDist2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-26-04 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. not so much fudged names, but you have to be a registered |
|
voter to sign the petitions.
|
mzmolly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-26-04 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Thanks for posting. I think Nader will eventually have to drop out the way things are looking for him today?
|
NMDemDist2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-26-04 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 08th 2024, 01:52 PM
Response to Original message |