Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton Is Against 'Whoop-Di-Do' Speeches

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 12:58 PM
Original message
Clinton Is Against 'Whoop-Di-Do' Speeches
ABC News' Eloise Harper reports: Sen. Hillary Clinton, perhaps venting a bit of frustration in a state where she was leading by double digits months ago, painted a grim state of affairs of this country outside a firehouse in West Chester, Pa., this morning.

After stressing the financial burdens Americans are suffering, problems with education, and more, Clinton stressed the critical decision these voters have to make. She jabbed her opponent, Sen. Barack Obama, who Saturday held his largest rally ever miles from the site where Clinton spoke.

“I don’t want to show up and give one of these whoop-di-do speeches and, you know, and just kind of get everybody whipped up," she said, "and those feel great and, you know, try to convince some of you to be for me.”

Clinton again made her argument that the White House is not a place for wimps, saying, “When you get into the general election and when you get into the White House, the stresses and pressures of the general election and the job are overwhelming. And we know we have to have a president ready on day one to take charge.”

Clinton refrained from criticizing the Republican frontrunner John McCain, and instead shared a story about their accommodations when they traveled oversees together.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/04/clinton-is-agai.html

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. After she wins PA, I hope Obama launches a huge array of attacks at her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Problem is he's trying to not offend all these Hillbots who say they will vote for McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. To quote Hillary: Screw 'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4themind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Use 'em
to screw mccain :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
50. This shows that she is out of touch with the people...
she has been around washington too long..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. You nailed it.. That makes it hard for him to attack her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tokenlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. He's swinging at her quite well this afternoon...
..I just hope he gets some coverage of his comments...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I mean in ad-buys and press conferences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
31. Good! Any clues
to give us? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
37. I don't think he is going to...
take the bait. The guy is running his campaign the same way. State by state. Racking up the votes and the delegates. why change now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hillary Lieberman. Can't wait for her to go the fuck away. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's a joke! She talked about how she shared accomodations with McCain?
What is wrong with her?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Then she is against everything her husband did.
He certainly has given a lot of "whoop-di-do" speeches. Pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
32. Where as hilary's speeches are
fucking downers. When was the last time
hilary said anything positive?

She's all Doom And Freakin' Gloom..
no wonder she has to slug it back.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. Whining again.
What was the attendance at the event where she made these stupid remarks?

I'd wager it was nowhere near 35,000.

And here's a note to Hillary" You weren't even ready to manage your own damn campaign from 'Day One.' You blew close to $150 million on second place.

That's a DQ for running the country in my book, sorry.

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
52. She's just so consistenly condescending. It's embarrassing. n/t
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. She hates Obama's speeches because he's better at it
Edited on Sat Apr-19-08 01:38 PM by rocknation
and she likes debating Obama because she's better at it.

She has accepted an invitation to http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5574033">debate in Indiana on April 24--two days after the PA primary and twelve days before the IN primary. Either she's out of money and needs the free national advertising, or her internal polls show that Obama actually could win PA and she needs the media diversion.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. She hates those "Big Speeches"
because she can't give one. Period.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. And if she could and Obama could not ---
she would say, "Oh Obama, you're just frustrated at your small turnouts" - much like she did after she won NH.

Obama can't win, according to her, no matter what he does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. Well La-dee-freakin-dah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. ROFLMAO !!!
:rofl::bounce::rofl:

:yourock:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. She's channeling her inner dreariness
Whoop-di-do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. More McCain fluffing and more Obama slamming. She's despicable.
Obama just pisses her off no end. She can't believe she couldn't coast into the nomination without actually doing anything and she's been more than one-upped. And she just HATES it. And now she's wrecking all kinds of shit because she didn't get what she wanted. What a nightmare she's become.

If Obama hit back with a fraction of the shit she's flung, her head would explode. I hope he's going to take some more action after PA. He has shown her collegiate respect and has gotten less than nothing back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. After she wins PA, he's going to have to go negative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4themind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. may depend on how much she wins by
If it's less then 10, the math will be as damning as anything obama could ever say,especially to the SD's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
18. Oh sour grapes, Hillary. Sour, sour grapes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. Yep. Some things never change. If you can't keep up, pretend you weren't trying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
19. So she refrained from criticizing McCain, eh?
Why am I not surprised?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. She was also against those "BIG rallies"
when the attendance to her rallies was dwindling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
22. That's mostly because she can't give them.
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
23. Except when she gives one in China
or Ireland - well those speeches make her the Goddess of Peace, doncha know.

God will she go away on Wednesday? Please please please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
24. When Bill was making those speeched, she liked them just fine..
she's pissed because her speeches are more like Mom telling you to clean up your room..and why your friends are more popular than you are ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renaissance Man Donating Member (420 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
28. Enough
"Enough with the big speeches, and the big rallies, and the outfundraising me, and the out-caucusing me, and the out-inspiring me, and the out-winning more states and more pledged delegates than me, or out-maturing me, or winning more superdelegates since Super Tuesday than me, or getting more people to attend a political rally than me."

This party was built on cynicism and everything we CAN'T DO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
29. Everyone hates hilary here where
I am in New York. They're all talkin' about
gettin' a special hilary hook made.

Go do some posing, hilary, and STFU.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
30. She just wishes she could give one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
33. But how does she feel about "Hot-cha-cha-cha" speeches?
Edited on Sat Apr-19-08 01:59 PM by Kurovski
And what of "bada-bing-bada-boom" rallies? Scudda-hoo-scudda-hey! Ain't there nothin' this down-in-the-dumps flapper thinks is the bee's-knees? Break out the flask and let's Charleston!

"Da-da...da-da...da, dadada, da-da! Dadadadaa, Dadadadaa, da da da da dadala dadadaa..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #33
53. I keep forgetting to roll my hose, and that crazy youtube!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychmommy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. kurovski you are stupid funny!!!!!!!!!!
i didn't think hilly could kick her leg that high. go hilly, crank that charleston. :headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. And here I was thinkin' that McCain was the keen big six! Well, baloney!
Hill's the berries! And I think that's my Kucinich leadin' the band!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
34. But the doo-doo speeches ain't a workin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. !
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. is she giving any this weekend?
Edited on Sat Apr-19-08 02:09 PM by stillcool47
oops..lost my mind for a minute. Of course she is..every time she is in front of a camera..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. She's giving one in Bethlehem
Tommorow. Got two robo calls and an email from the county democratic party (they advertise obama events too) plus an email from her campaign (they got my email address when I wrote them to tell them what I think of her campaign).

She's having it at a small location a high school vs. the College arena Obama had. Afraid of empty seats or she wants the impression it is huge with the overflow. The high school can seat at max 1500.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
36. Dear Hillary,
Please bite me.
Sincerely, Oregonian
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
39. She's only miffed because she couldn't get 35,000 people to hear her speak
(how many did she have outside the firehouse?)

the more she slurps McCain the more she will alienate Democrats
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
41. Clinton (failed NY Bar Exam) characterizes (Harvard Law Review) Obama's speeches as 'WHOOP-DI-DOO?"
oh, how can this be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
42. Whoop-de-doo
Someone sounds bitter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #42
56. vo-do-dee-oh-do! Oh you kid! She's just a jazz baby, jazzin' it up.
She ain't no poor butterfly, no wallflower pinin' away for good times! No siree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
43. Right. Being a grating, uninspiring public speaker is part of her PLAN.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intaglio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
44. Well if she is against whoop-de-do speeches
Then, maybe, she is against these speeches. And I am not comparing Obama to these greats - but Hillary's attitude to such speeches calls her judgement into doubt

Fourscore and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation or any nation so conceived and so dedicated can long endure. We are met on a great battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of it as a final resting place for those who died here that the nation might live. This we may, in all propriety do. But in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate, we cannot consecrate, we cannot hallow this ground. The brave men, living and dead who struggled here have hallowed it far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here.

It is rather for us the living, we here be dedicated to the great task remaining before us--that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they here gave the last full measure of devotion--that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain, that this nation shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth."


Or maybe this one

Mr. Vice President, Mr. Speaker, members of the Senate and the House of Representatives:

Yesterday, December 7, 1941 - a date which will live in infamy - the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the Empire of Japan.

The United States was at peace with that nation, and, at the solicitation of Japan, was still in conversation with its government and its Emperor looking toward the maintenance of peace in the Pacific.

Indeed, one hour after Japanese air squadrons had commenced bombing in the American island of Oahu, the Japanese Ambassador to the United States and his colleague delivered to our Secretary of State a formal reply to a recent American message. And, while this reply stated that it seemed useless to continue the existing diplomatic negotiations, it contained no threat or hint of war or of armed attack.

It will be recorded that the distance of Hawaii from Japan makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks ago. During the intervening time the Japanese Government has deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.

The attack yesterday on the Hawaiian Islands has caused severe damage to American naval and military forces. I regret to tell you that very many American lives have been lost. In addition, American ships have been reported torpedoed on the high seas between San Francisco and Honolulu.

Yesterday the Japanese Government also launched an attack against Malaya.
Last night Japanese forces attacked Hong Kong.
Last night Japanese forces attacked Guam.
Last night Japanese forces attacked the Philippine Islands.
Last night the Japanese attacked Wake Island.
And this morning the Japanese attacked Midway Island.

Japan has therefore undertaken a surprise offensive extending throughout the Pacific area. The facts of yesterday and today speak for themselves. The people of the United States have already formed their opinions and well understand the implications to the very life and safety of our nation.

As Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy I have directed that all measures be taken for our defense, that always will our whole nation remember the character of the onslaught against us.

No matter how long it may take us to overcome this premeditated invasion, the American people, in their righteous might, will win through to absolute victory.

I believe that I interpret the will of the Congress and of the people when I assert that we will not only defend ourselves to the uttermost but will make it very certain that this form of treachery shall never again endanger us.

Hostilities exist. There is no blinking at the fact that our people, our territory and our interests are in grave danger.

With confidence in our armed forces, with the unbounding determination of our people, we will gain the inevitable triumph. So help us God.

I ask that the Congress declare that since the unprovoked and dastardly attack by Japan on Sunday, December 7, 1941, a state of war has existed between the United States and the Japanese Empire.


Perhaps this one

President Pitzer, Mr. Vice President, Governor, Congressman Thomas, Senator Wiley, and Congressman Miller, Mr. Webb. Mr. Bell, scientists, distinguished guests, and ladies and gentlemen:

I appreciate your president having made me an honorary visiting professor, and I will assure you that my first lecture will be very brief.

I am delighted to be here and I'm particularly delighted to be here on this occasion.

We meet at a college noted for knowledge, in a city noted for progress, in a State noted for strength, and we stand in need of all three, for we meet in an hour of change and challenge, in a decade of hope and fear, in an age of both knowledge and ignorance. The greater our knowledge increases, the greater our ignorance unfolds.

Despite the striking fact that most of the scientists that the world has ever known are alive and working today, despite the fact that this Nation's own scientific manpower is doubling every 12 years in a rate of growth more than three times that of our population as a whole, despite that, the vast stretches of the unknown and the unanswered and the unfinished still far outstrip our collective comprehension.

No man can fully grasp how far and how fast we have come, but condense, if you will, the 50,000 years of man's recorded history in a time span of but a half-century. Stated in these terms, we know very little about the first 40 years, except at the end of them advanced man had learned to use the skins of animals to cover them. Then about 10 years ago, under this standard, man emerged from his caves to construct other kinds of shelter. Only 5 years ago man learned to write and use a cart with wheels. Christianity began less than 2 years ago. The printing press came this year, and then less than 2 months ago, during this whole 50-year span of human history, the steam engine provided a new source of power.

Newton explored the meaning of gravity. Last month electric lights and telephones and automobiles and airplanes became available. Only last week did we develop penicillin and television and nuclear power, and now if America's new spacecraft succeeds in reaching Venus, we will have literally reached the stars before midnight tonight.

This is a breathtaking pace, and such a pace cannot help but create new ills as it dispels old, new ignorance, new problems, new dangers. Surely the opening vistas of space promise high costs and hardships, as well as high reward.

So it is not surprising that some would have us stay where we are a little longer to rest, to wait. But this city of Houston, this State of Texas, this country of the United States was not built by those who waited and rested and wished to look behind them. This country was conquered by those who moved forward--and so will space.

William Bradford, speaking in 1630 of the founding of the Plymouth Bay Colony, said that all great and honorable actions are accompanied with great difficulties, and both must be enterprised and overcome with answerable courage.

If this capsule history of our progress teaches us anything, it is that man, in his quest for knowledge and progress, is determined and cannot be deterred. The exploration of space will go ahead, whether we join in it or not, and it is one of the great adventures of all time, and no nation which expects to be the leader of other nations can expect to stay behind in this race for space.

Those who came before us made certain that this country rode the first waves of the industrial revolutions, the first waves of modern invention, and the first wave of nuclear power, and this generation does not intend to founder in the backwash of the coming age of space. We mean to be a part of it--we mean to lead it. For the eyes of the world now look into space, to the moon and to the planets beyond, and we have vowed that we shall not see it governed by a hostile flag of conquest, but by a banner of freedom and peace. We have vowed that we shall not see space filled with weapons of mass destruction, but with instruments of knowledge and understanding.

Yet the vows of this Nation can only be fulfilled if we in this Nation are first, and, therefore, we intend to be first. In short, our leadership in science and in industry, our hopes for peace and security, our obligations to ourselves as well as others, all require us to make this effort, to solve these mysteries, to solve them for the good of all men, and to become the world's leading space-faring nation.

We set sail on this new sea because there is new knowledge to be gained, and new rights to be won, and they must be won and used for the progress of all people. For space science, like nuclear science and all technology, has no conscience of its own. Whether it will become a force for good or ill depends on man, and only if the United States occupies a position of pre-eminence can we help decide whether this new ocean will be a sea of peace or a new terrifying theater of war. I do not say that we should or will go unprotected against the hostile misuse of space any more than we go unprotected against the hostile use of land or sea, but I do say that space can be explored and mastered without feeding the fires of war, without repeating the mistakes that man has made in extending his writ around this globe of ours.

There is no strife, no prejudice, no national conflict in outer space as yet. Its hazards are hostile to us all. Its conquest deserves the best of all mankind, and its opportunity for peaceful cooperation may never come again. But why, some say, the moon? Why choose this as our goal? And they may well ask why climb the highest mountain. Why, 35 years ago, fly the Atlantic? Why does Rice play Texas?

We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win, and the others, too.

It is for these reasons that I regard the decision last year to shift our efforts in space from low to high gear as among the most important decisions that will be made during my incumbency in the Office of the Presidency.

In the last 24 hours we have seen facilities now being created for the greatest and most complex exploration in man's history. We have felt the ground shake and the air shattered by the testing of a Saturn C-1 booster rocket, many times as powerful as the Atlas which launched John Glenn, generating power equivalent to 10,000 automobiles with their accelerators on the floor. We have seen the site where five F-1 rocket engines, each one as powerful as all eight engines of the Saturn combined, will be clustered together to make the advanced Saturn missile, assembled in a new building to be built at Cape Canaveral as tall as a 48-story structure, as wide as a city block, and as long as two lengths of this field.

Within these last 19 months at least 45 satellites have circled the earth. Some 40 of them were "made in the United States of America" and they were far more sophisticated and supplied far more knowledge to the people of the world than those of the Soviet Union.

The Mariner spacecraft now on its way to Venus is the most intricate instrument in the history of space science. The accuracy of that shot is comparable to firing a missile from Cape Canaveral and dropping it in this stadium between the 40-yard lines.

Transit satellites are helping our ships at sea to steer a safer course. Tiros satellites have given us unprecedented warnings of hurricanes and storms, and will do the same for forest fires and icebergs.

We have had our failures, but so have others, even if they do not admit them. And they may be less public.

To be sure, we are behind, and will be behind for some time in manned flight. But we do not intend to stay behind, and in this decade we shall make up and move ahead.

The growth of our science and education will be enriched by new knowledge of our universe and environment, by new techniques of learning and mapping and observation, by new tools and computers for industry, medicine, the home as well as the school. Technical institutions, such as Rice, will reap the harvest of these gains.

And finally, the space effort itself, while still in its infancy, has already created a great number of new companies, and tens of thousands of new jobs. Space and related industries are generating new demands in investment and skilled personnel, and this city and this State, and this region, will share greatly in this growth. What was once the furthest outpost on the old frontier of the West will be the furthest outpost on the new frontier of science and space. Houston, your City of Houston, with its Manned Spacecraft Center, will become the heart of a large scientific and engineering community. During the next 5 years the National Aeronautics and Space Administration expects to double the number of scientists and engineers in this area, to increase its outlays for salaries and expenses to $60 million a year; to invest some $200 million in plant and laboratory facilities; and to direct or contract for new space efforts over $1 billion from this Center in this City.

To be sure, all this costs us all a good deal of money. This year's space budget is three times what it was in January 1961, and it is greater than the space budget of the previous 8 years combined. That budget now stands at $5,400 million a year--a staggering sum, though somewhat less than we pay for cigarettes and cigars every year. Space expenditures will soon rise some more, from 40 cents per person per week to more than 50 cents a week for every man, woman, and child in the United States, for we have given this program a high national priority-even though I realize that this is in some measure an act of faith and vision, for we do not now know what benefits await us. But if I were to say, my fellow citizens, that we shall send to the moon, 240,000 miles away from the control station in Houston, a giant rocket more than 300 feet tall, the length of this football field, made of new metal alloys, some of which have not yet been invented, capable of standing heat and stresses several times more than have ever been experienced, fitted together with a precision better than the finest watch, carrying all the equipment needed for propulsion, guidance, control, communications, food and survival, on an untried mission, to an unknown celestial body, and then return it safely to earth, reentering the atmosphere at speeds of over 25,000 miles per hour, causing heat about half that of the temperature of the sun-almost as hot as it is here today--and do all this, and do it right, and do it first before this decade is out, then we must be bold.

I'm the one who is doing all the work, so we just want you to stay cool for a minute.

However, I think we're going to do it, and I think that we must pay what needs to be paid. I don't think we ought to waste any money, but I think we ought to do the job. And this will be done in the decade of the sixties. It may be done while some of you are still here at school at this college and university. It will be done during the terms of office of some of the people who sit here on this platform. But it will be done. And it will be done before the end of this decade.

I am delighted that this university is playing a part in putting a man on the moon as part of a great national effort of the United States of America.

Many years ago the great British explorer George Mallory, who was to die on Mount Everest, was asked why did he want to climb it. He said, "Because it is there."

Well, space is there, and we're going to climb it, and the moon and the planets are there, and new hopes for knowledge and peace are there. And, therefore, as we set sail we ask God's blessing on the most hazardous and dangerous and greatest adventure on which man has ever embarked.

Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
45. LOL - hate those speeches that make you feel good. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
46. Wha? A "grim" state of affairs?
What happened to resilient and optimistic, Hill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
47. And I live in a van down by the river!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
48. Who says 'whoop de do'?
Is this 1930's slang? Just wondering. I think my Grandmother born before 1900 used to say that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #48
54. same people who say twenty three skidooooo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
powergirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
49. She is frustrated because people don't show up to her "whoop-di-do" events
Shouldn't she be glad that a Democratic candidate has that many live actual voters who will vote for DEMOCRATS!!! Doesn't she know the Republicans are terrified when they see 35,000 Democrats OUTSIDE in Philly to listen to Obama. Clinton and the Republicans are seething with envy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
51. Must suck that no one cares what she does.
Her moment has passed and she just can't accept it. Oh well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
55. I just heard "whoop-dee-do" used by a three-headed dog
on The Venture Brothers. So it's cool!

I'm writing in the three-headed dog on my ballot.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
58. If she were capable of giving one
She would be pro the 'Whoop-Di-Do' Speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4themind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
60. Maybe she's upset that not enough people give a "whoop" about hers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
61. Tippecanoe and Clinton too!
Odds bodkins, eh what?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
62. Can a get a harumph? I didnt get a harumph from you!
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
63. Sure Hildo...
just keep doing what you've been doing....

clap clap point point clap clap point point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC