jackson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 09:07 AM
Original message |
Example of MSM bias: guess who Matthews has on as a Philadelphia journalist? |
|
The wife of Obama supporter Rep. Chaka Fattah, who Obama endorsed over the agent of change and reformer Michael Nutter for mayor. Yes. Of all Philadelphia journalists Matthews happened to choose an Obamite's wife to appear on his panel. No MSM bias? :eyes:
|
NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 09:10 AM
Response to Original message |
1. It's hard to find journalist that don't support Obama |
|
Journalists are very knowledgeable of the FACTS. That's why they supported Kerry over Bush and now Obama over Clinton.
|
Jim Sagle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. REAL journalists don't support ANYBODY, they just report the news and let US do the supporting. |
|
Or is that not simple enough for you?
|
jackson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Edited on Sun Apr-20-08 09:14 AM by jackson_dem
|
NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
9. Here's something a little more complex |
|
See if you able to keep up. Journalist are people, they are naturally going to support people. Now a GOOD (which is the correct word to use, since "real" simply means you get paid to be one) sets aside their personal preferences when they are doing their job.
|
Jim Sagle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. No, the correct word is REAL, not GOOD. |
|
A journalist who supports a candidate through his work is not a real journalist, even if he gets paid. He's a fake. You're the one that needs to keep up.
|
NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. Do you have proof to back up this rather tenuous claim? |
|
After all being the wife of someone, does not prove that one's work is bias. While I know camp Clinton loves the whole "guilt by association" concept, it's an intellectually dishonest approach.
|
Jim Sagle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
16. Guilt by association makes complete sense if they assocation is marriage. Duhh!!!! |
rug
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. That's why they did such an effective job revealing the facts on Iraq in 2002. |
jackson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
6. The MSM supported Bush, especially General Electric... |
Maddy McCall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
8. Wrong. Journalists are supposed to be objective. |
NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. Here is something a little more complex |
|
Journalist are people and they will, as people tend to do, develop personal opinions as to who the best candidate is. However when a journalist does their job they should be objective. So just because a journalist supports one canidate or the other, doesn't mean they are incapable of doing a good job.
If you look at most demographic break downs of the candidate's support, it's quite clear the better educated you are, the more likely you are to support Obama. Which makes a lot of sense. Since journalists tend to be better educated than the general public, it would stand to reason that they are more likely to support Obama.
|
hendo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
19. Now thats funny. Thanks for the laugh n/t. |
Upton
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 09:12 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Yeah sure, we saw a good example of that in the last debate. If anything the MSM has overcompensated because of past charges of bias against Clinton, now the bias is against Obama.
|
jackson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. You're telling me GE couldn't find a Philly journalist whose spouse hasn't endorsed O? |
|
The debate was normal. The front runner always gets hammered--how do you think O got into the lead?
|
NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
13. Guilt by association? |
jackson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
17. She was shilling for O on the show, besides a legit org. should have found an unbiased person |
|
If Obama wins her husband benefits. She has a horse in this race.
|
Upton
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
14. The debate wasn't "normal" |
|
if that had been Clinton getting all those BS questions you would be complaining of "MSM bias."
|
EffieBlack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 09:25 AM
Response to Original message |
15. You mean, like ABC having a "journalist" moderate a debate involving his former boss' wife? |
|
Edited on Sun Apr-20-08 09:27 AM by EffieBlack
Or like Tim Russert last week presented Jim Carville as a "Democratic strategist"although he is supporting only one of the Democrats?
I don't buy the "guilt by association" argument. Unless you have some evidence that Renee-Chenault-Fattah has shown a bias in her coverage because her husband has endorsed one of the candidates, your outrage is somewhat misplaced.
|
jackson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
18. You didn't watch the show. She was pro-Obama, which isn't surprising |
|
You mentioned Carville. There are other "Democratic strategists" who appear on shows and are Obama supporters, such as Donna Brazile.
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message |
20. So is Larry King biased by having Hillary on on the eve of the Primary? |
|
Another faux outrage turd of an OP from you. It's neverending, your crap.
|
Starbucks Anarchist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message |
21. Next thing you know, a former Clinton aide will moderate a debate. |
TML
(749 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message |
22. You had Stephanopoulos & Gibson on Wed. night |
Condem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 07:48 PM
Response to Original message |
23. Jesus, Jackson, why so uptight? |
|
All the political "analysts" are calling for a 10 point win for Hillary.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:39 PM
Response to Original message |