Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Example of MSM bias: guess who Matthews has on as a Philadelphia journalist?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:07 AM
Original message
Example of MSM bias: guess who Matthews has on as a Philadelphia journalist?
The wife of Obama supporter Rep. Chaka Fattah, who Obama endorsed over the agent of change and reformer Michael Nutter for mayor. Yes. Of all Philadelphia journalists Matthews happened to choose an Obamite's wife to appear on his panel. No MSM bias? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's hard to find journalist that don't support Obama
Journalists are very knowledgeable of the FACTS. That's why they supported Kerry over Bush and now Obama over Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. REAL journalists don't support ANYBODY, they just report the news and let US do the supporting.
Or is that not simple enough for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. wrong reply
Edited on Sun Apr-20-08 09:14 AM by jackson_dem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Here's something a little more complex
See if you able to keep up. Journalist are people, they are naturally going to support people. Now a GOOD (which is the correct word to use, since "real" simply means you get paid to be one) sets aside their personal preferences when they are doing their job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. No, the correct word is REAL, not GOOD.
A journalist who supports a candidate through his work is not a real journalist, even if he gets paid. He's a fake. You're the one that needs to keep up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Do you have proof to back up this rather tenuous claim?
After all being the wife of someone, does not prove that one's work is bias. While I know camp Clinton loves the whole "guilt by association" concept, it's an intellectually dishonest approach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Guilt by association makes complete sense if they assocation is marriage. Duhh!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. That's why they did such an effective job revealing the facts on Iraq in 2002.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. The MSM supported Bush, especially General Electric...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Wrong. Journalists are supposed to be objective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Here is something a little more complex
Journalist are people and they will, as people tend to do, develop personal opinions as to who the best candidate is. However when a journalist does their job they should be objective. So just because a journalist supports one canidate or the other, doesn't mean they are incapable of doing a good job.

If you look at most demographic break downs of the candidate's support, it's quite clear the better educated you are, the more likely you are to support Obama. Which makes a lot of sense. Since journalists tend to be better educated than the general public, it would stand to reason that they are more likely to support Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hendo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Now thats funny. Thanks for the laugh n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. MSM bias?
Yeah sure, we saw a good example of that in the last debate. If anything the MSM has overcompensated because of past charges of bias against Clinton, now the bias is against Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. You're telling me GE couldn't find a Philly journalist whose spouse hasn't endorsed O?
The debate was normal. The front runner always gets hammered--how do you think O got into the lead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Guilt by association?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. She was shilling for O on the show, besides a legit org. should have found an unbiased person
If Obama wins her husband benefits. She has a horse in this race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. The debate wasn't "normal"
if that had been Clinton getting all those BS questions you would be complaining of "MSM bias."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
15. You mean, like ABC having a "journalist" moderate a debate involving his former boss' wife?
Edited on Sun Apr-20-08 09:27 AM by EffieBlack
Or like Tim Russert last week presented Jim Carville as a "Democratic strategist"although he is supporting only one of the Democrats?

I don't buy the "guilt by association" argument. Unless you have some evidence that Renee-Chenault-Fattah has shown a bias in her coverage because her husband has endorsed one of the candidates, your outrage is somewhat misplaced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. You didn't watch the show. She was pro-Obama, which isn't surprising
You mentioned Carville. There are other "Democratic strategists" who appear on shows and are Obama supporters, such as Donna Brazile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
20. So is Larry King biased by having Hillary on on the eve of the Primary?
Another faux outrage turd of an OP from you. It's neverending, your crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
21. Next thing you know, a former Clinton aide will moderate a debate.
Oh, wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TML Donating Member (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
22. You had Stephanopoulos & Gibson on Wed. night
It's our turn. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Condem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
23. Jesus, Jackson, why so uptight?
All the political "analysts" are calling for a 10 point win for Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC