sorrybushisfromtexas
(416 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 07:12 PM
Original message |
Many Hillary supporters if they will admit it.... |
|
support her mainly because she is a woman and by God if she doesn't get the nomination they will not vote for the man that has beaten her. That is as sexist as you can get.
I prefer Barack, not because he's black, not because he is a man, but because of his campaign, the excitement I see for him from the young (who are the future of the party), the fact that he was against the Irag war before it started. I believe his the better candidate because much of his monetary support comes from individuals like me. I think that he is much more electable than her.
Hillary's negatives nationwide have always been over 50%. That is not because of Obama, I think much of it is baggage from Bill's presidency. She was the presumed victor and yes the MSM did look at her campaign more negatively. They would have been more critical of Barack's if he had been the presumed victor. That was not his fault. She ran a disorganized campaign, did not make plans for the other primaries after Super Tuesday, this was not Obama's fault. Her staff has been at each others throats. That is not Barack's fault. She is losing because she raised a lot less money than he. She depended on party fat cats, and he depend mainly on individuals that give about $100 a pop. That is not Barack's fault. Much of the Clinton anger needs to go to a poorly strategized campaign, a warring staff, and money spent unwisely. Again this is not the Obama campaign's fault. Her use of the internet to organize was juvenile compared to his well organized campaign. Not Obama's fault.
For a democrat to vote for McCain or sit out the GE if their candidate does not get the nomination, reminds me of the sixth graders I teach. If they get mad at each other they want to take their ball and go home. It is immature, juvenile behavior, that I expect to see from preteens not adults during one of the most important elections in our lifetimes.
If Hillary, who I think was a much better candidate until she went negative, is the nominee I will support her as I have Barack. I will make phone calls, go door to door, and give each month as I have to him.
Things have been said from both sides that are regretful. I have heard Hillary say some of those things, I have not heard Barack put her down as she has put him down. Yes surrogates have but you haven't heard it from him. Her negativity has cost her votes.
Let's pull together after the nomination is decided and win in November. Our children's and grandchildren's futures depend on it. I am an aging hippie and I am sorrybushcamefromtexas
Peace :hippie:
|
Erin Elizabeth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Bush is just a faux Texan anyway.
It's real simple for me--I think Obama will make the better president, period. It has nada to do with skin color, what kinda junk they have in their pants, who their parents were, what they were doing when they were eight, blah blah blah. It's about competency, which encompasses a whole world of other skills and assets. Obama's got it, tons of it. Clinton does not.
That's all there is to it for me. The right wing must be pretty disappointed it won't be Clinton. I know they wanted her pretty badly.
|
Tellurian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
15. I don't believe that at all.. |
|
Hillary has been grooming herself for this position for years. She is the most qualified candidate for the job unlike the "pretender" with his extensive library of wishes and dreams.. The Bamboozler, the longer he runs the more people's eyes are opened to the pitiful shell of a politician, who has never delivered a thing to anyone but himself.
|
Erin Elizabeth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
25. I haven't seen a single shred of evidence of this: |
|
the longer he runs the more people's eyes are opened to the pitiful shell of a politician, who has never delivered a thing to anyone but himself
I find the grooming herself for this position for years line to be creepy.
|
dchill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
26. "the longer he runs the more people's eyes are opened" |
|
Oh, yeah, I've seen that in the results of ALL the polls and primaries. :sarcasm:
|
roguevalley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
Umbram
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-21-08 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
36. "Hillary has been grooming herself for this position for years." Looks like she needs 8 more years |
IsItJustMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I have been thinking along the same lines for quit some time now. It seems to be a very superficial |
|
thing to base your vote on, but that is America.
|
DerekJ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. May I be rude and say that the criteria by which Americans choose their candidates are fucked up. |
|
And that you (Americans) really need to sort out your priorities.
|
IsItJustMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
17. Yes, you may be rude when it is a truthful observation. We have elected a moron twice in the last |
|
Edited on Sun Apr-20-08 07:44 PM by IsItJustMe
eight years. People here base there vote on the most trivial and petty reasoning. There is no way in hell that I can even begin to explain it, except that I believe that our media has had an undue influence in it all.
It's almost as if most of this entire country's voters are under some type of dastardly trance or something. It's not good, and I am praying that it will not take a rude awakening call (depression, a complete suspension of our civil rights, etc...) for the people of this country to wake up and take control of our destiny before it is too late.
This we shall see.
|
boppers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message |
4. They can't admit it, though. |
|
Admitting to their own sexism seems to be a problem for them.
|
Petey Wheatie
(59 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Not me. I support her cuz she's a tank...and Obama's a tricycle. n/t |
undeterred
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
She's a republican who repels millions of people and Obama's a progressive who is loved the world over.
|
sorrybushisfromtexas
(416 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. not flaming but please answer |
|
Petey Wheatie
Will you vote for Barack if he is the candidate, I appreciate your passion for your candidate in the primaries.
What about the GE if and probably when she loses the nomination.
|
Petey Wheatie
(59 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. I will vote for Obama. n/t |
sorrybushisfromtexas
(416 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
I hope that the nominee is known as soon as possible and we can concentrate on McBush.
|
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-21-08 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
39. I will vote for the DEMOCRAT. |
|
I do not participate in the cult of personality currently sapping the intelligence of DUers.
|
SoFlaJet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
who will you support if Obama is the dem nominee in November?
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
14. how come the tricycle is outmaneuvering the tank and |
|
has consistently done so?
|
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-21-08 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
42. I seem to recall another tank ... four of them, actually. |
DesertFlower
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message |
8. i will vote for hillary if she is the nominee. nt |
SoFlaJet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message |
10. damn good post from a true democrat |
|
who is calling it like he (and I) see it. The Clinton supporters here and on some of the blog sites are quick to blame Obama for doing exactly what she has and still is doing; attacking him. The truth be told she IS doing it a lot more than he is. Take that sham of a debate last week-he could have hammered her on Bosnia but chose instead to say that it's too bad that this stuff is so often focused on INSTEAD of the real issues. She, OTOH went right after him any chance she got. THAT kind of politics is what turned me away from her after my guy dropped out (Edwards). Like you though my Lone Star friend I too will support whoever is the democratic nominee.
|
bettyellen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message |
11. many support Obama because he's very good looking though- seems like a cool guy |
|
there's been plenty enough threads about what a hottie he is. I agree with you, this seems to be the most superficial race ever.
|
Yael
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
19. Can you separate the two? |
|
Because I have yet to see a single person here say that is the reason they support him.
Please provide evidence of this.
|
bettyellen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
28. LOL, you haven;t seen the gushing threads- there's one every day about a hot pic of |
|
the man. of course no one's going to say it matters. just like no one admits disliking hillary for being an old hag, or pardon me- shrill old post meanapausal hag. did you miss those post about hillary's looks too? stuff like that has no effect on anyone. LOL. of course not. we're better than that. i wish.
|
dbonds
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 07:40 PM
Response to Original message |
16. I would love to see a woman president, just not THAT woman. |
|
Being female I know how it is running into sexism. I want to see that gone. But Hillary is not close to the best we have to offer.
|
Yael
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message |
18. They played the wrong hand |
|
Not only is ONLY voting for her because she is a woman sexist, it is going to set back viable female politicians who will now need to frame their every move to distance themselves from how she ran her campaign lest they are compared to her.
Its toxic.
|
mcctatas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
|
I would love to see a viable woman candidate again in my lifetime, but since Hillary was under the assumption that the only way for a woman to win is to be more hawkish, more authoritarian and downright prickish (you know, like a man;) )she may have blown it for women for another 200 years, and no matter how good I take care of myself, I won't be around for that...
|
sorrybushisfromtexas
(416 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
23. I am a teacher and have seen many women principals |
|
think that they had to prove they had balls just like a man. They should be who they are. This is not intended to be sexist in any way just an observation from an aging hippie.
:hippie: :hippie: :hippie:
Peace I am sorrybushisfromtexas
|
bettyellen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
31. not intending to be sexist but is.... women should act like what YOU think women should be like. |
|
we're a diverse lot, but thanks for the pigeonholes!
|
NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 08:03 PM
Response to Original message |
21. You pretty much nailed it, well done |
GoldieAZ49
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 08:04 PM
Response to Original message |
22. admit that Obama's support is because of race |
|
then it might be worth reading past your first sentence.
|
sorrybushisfromtexas
(416 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
24. I admit that Barack's popularity .. |
|
is high among most black african americans. Hillary's support is high from many women. I am a white man, age 58, and the least sexist person in the world. I clean toilets, wash clothes, go to the grocery story, just like my wife does. I respect her decisions like she does mine. By the way she is a woman for Obama. I was not flaming Hillary. I will gladly vote for her if she is the nominee.
The only people I have personally heard in Texas being sexist about Hillary has been white women and white men of the Republican party. Bitch, is their favorite, adjective. I take up for her every time I hear crap like that. There is no place for that. I have heard a lot of racial slurs from the same people about Barack. They are usually lower middle class and are Rush fans.
|
Yael
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
27. I can't wait for Tuesday... |
Ronnie
(674 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 09:08 PM
Response to Original message |
29. 'Many' is a weasel word. |
|
It doesn't say anything. For example: Many people who post on this site have no idea what they are talking about. See how that works? BTW, I learned that in high school. Haven't they taught that in your high school yet?
|
sorrybushisfromtexas
(416 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
32. Teach 6th grade Science |
|
Point well taken. More than a few, is that any better.
It is funny that not one Hillary supporter said anything about my points about her campaign.:evilgrin: :evilgrin: :evilgrin: :evilgrin: :evilgrin: :evilgrin: :evilgrin: :evilgrin: :evilgrin: :evilgrin: :evilgrin: :evilgrin: :evilgrin:
|
goldcanyonaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-20-08 11:58 PM
Response to Original message |
33. So, you're a man who supports another man. Hmmm, interesting, NOT! |
sorrybushisfromtexas
(416 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-21-08 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #33 |
34. I didn''t say it was women voting for Cllinton because |
|
she was a woman. I said Clinton supporters. I think it would have been a great time to nominate a woman. If it wasn't for Obama and his well run campaign I would be a strong supporter of her. Her campaign was run very poorly and I think she thought she was the nominee and had it locked up and he didn't have a chance.
I wish one Clinton supporter would have at least looked at my premise that she had a poorly run campaign.
Only one replied they would vote for the nominee whether it be Clinton, or Obama.
They have attacked the post because I used the word Many. They attacked it because I was a man. (Only half a man now, I am own my 5th life, I had the same cancer as Lance Armstrong twice and have had to have two brain surgeries. ) At least I am still a kicking and able to give my opinions.
|
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-21-08 12:28 AM
Response to Original message |
35. The only thing worse than silly Clinton supporters is silly Obama supporters. |
sorrybushisfromtexas
(416 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-21-08 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #35 |
37. If you were refering to a silly Obama supporter |
|
I had testicular cancer when I was 31 and 43. I had two brain surgeries for blood clots on my brain in December 2007.
That makes me silly? Hopefully you were not referring to my last post.
AND IF YOU WERE. I forgive you because that is the kind of person I am. I have learned to only sweat the big stuff, trust in God, and love my wife and family more everyday.
Peace :hippie: :hippie: :evilgrin: :evilgrin: :hippie: :hippie: I am an aging hippie and I am sorrybushisfromtexas
|
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-21-08 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #37 |
40. No, what makes you silly is what you said in the OP.... |
|
... Grats on making it through the various maladies tho!
|
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-21-08 12:53 AM
Response to Original message |
38. What a completely idiotic set of suppositions. |
|
Stop projecting your cranky, whiny baby attitude onto us.
And I'm sorry that the spectre of growing old is so awful to you that the image of YOUTH is your reason for voting.
|
sorrybushisfromtexas
(416 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-21-08 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #38 |
43. What are you talking about. |
|
I am not cranky, I am only 58, I teach everyday. I volunteer with a boys' group at church, work with girl's softball, have way too many meetings and enjoy the hell out of every day.I have a wonderful wife, two great kids, a great daughter in law, and the world's best grandkids.
The youth are our future and I have never ever seen them so excited about an election.
I vote because that is what my mother and father taught me to do.
I am a democrat because we care.
I don't flame because it is not polite.
I don't get mad when people are passionate about their candidate. Way too much personal rancor in here. I wasn't whining, please answer my suppositions about Clinton's poorly run campaign. By the way I think she is a good candidate, he is just better.
|
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-21-08 01:15 AM
Response to Original message |
41. "the man that has beaten her" |
|
That's an interesting way to phrase it. (One must wonder if that's the subliminal equivalence.)
:eyes:
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:40 AM
Response to Original message |