Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why does using the word "bitch" make someone sexist?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Levgreee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:06 PM
Original message
Why does using the word "bitch" make someone sexist?
Edited on Sun Apr-20-08 08:11 PM by Levgreee
Although I rarely/never use harsh derogatory terms towards people...

I would not ALWAYS refrain from using the B word against a female who acting in an offensive manner.
I would actually call males the B word at times too.

Now, "B" is a word that is extremely common, used on cable, movies, music, etc. etc. It is even used by some feminists, and some feminist-leaning musicians.

IT IS NOT a parallel to the N-word for blacks... the reason for this, I believe, is MOSTLY the historical significance of the N-word, and also because it is so specific towards a group (which the B-word is not... although there are other more specific female insults).


I feel some people get offended by the word (as people would for bastard, F***er, and so on), and since the offense is directed towards a woman, they generalize that feeling of being offended into sexism. But really, if you called a female a stupid elitist liar bigot, that is much more derogatory insult (imo) but you wouldn't be called sexist for it, because it doesn't include the "key words".



Now, if I call someone the B word at anytime, why do I become sexist? If I am sexist because of it, and someone can tell me why, I will mend my ways and not use it anymore, because I strive to be a person respectful towards different social groups and values.

Why does a gender-specific(or somewhat specific) insults automatically become sexist, while worser insults directed towards that same female are not sexist, even if they are more derogatory or severe?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not specific toward a group?
I guess you don't consider women a "group."

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Levgreee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. totally missed my point... I said "the reason for this, I believe, is mostly the historical signific
significance"


I didn't say there are not gender-specific insults, but being gender-specific alone does not make the insult sexist, IMO. I said the historical significance of the N-word is what makes it completely unacceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. If it's an insult, and it's gender specific, that makes it sexist.
Sorta like, you know, by definition.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Levgreee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I don't believe it does
What is your definition of sexist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. If you call a woman a bitch, and she's offended, it's sexist.
You'll know it because your face will sting and turn red. From being slapped. Righteously.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Levgreee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. So if they are not offended, then it is not sexist?
Edited on Sun Apr-20-08 08:20 PM by Levgreee
So sexism is determined subjectively, on the terms of the person receiving the insult?

Hot damn! No one can call me lazy because I can rightfully say they are anti-semitic! Maybe I can get a settlement at work for being the target of bigotry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #20
32. No, if they are not offended, you're just lucky.
You're being obtuse, you know it and I know it and everyone else here knows it. "Bitch" refers to a female dog, acc. to Webster, and it's an insult. A slur. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that (and obviously you're not one of those).

Or maybe you're just itching to use that term for one of the candidates, and you are defending yourself in advance.

It's sexist. Period.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #18
35. What if I called her a Bastard? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
41. isnt the stereotype of angry face slapping women
sexist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. I suppose a knee in the nuts would work equally well.
The slap is more socially acceptable and less likely to result in escalating violence, however.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. God damn that sexist misogynist pig Meredith Brooks straight to HELL anyway!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Idiot. She reclaimed it, just like AA's did the N-word.
Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. And Elton John better damn himself to Hell for HIS misogyny, while we're at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. Great video.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. It just does bitch!!!!!
Just kidding. Seriously, I don't see it as sexist (I am female). It is a derogatory word with gender implied. But using it doesn't make one sexist unless they call every woman that. So it may be a term a sexist person could use, but using the word doesn't make one a sexist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. I breed Rat Terriers, I love my Bitch's
Grand Champions, Agility Champions and My best Friends. It is a word of Honor, never has there be a word so misconstrued.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. Ah, quit yer bitchin'
:hide:

:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. I'm a bitch (at times) and I bitch
Edited on Sun Apr-20-08 08:16 PM by cali
got a problem with that, boyo?

:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. No ma'am
:blush:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
27. I am a male, so I can be a bastard at times, and yes I can bitch also.
Maybe I am to old school to see myself as a bitch though. I don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. How many frown on "bitch" but use the term "prick"?
A bitch is a bitch.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Or "scumbag". It is almost never used to describe a woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. I use them both...
when appropriate and necessary. (or when I'm really bitching out my husband for being a prick! ;) )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erin Elizabeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. Or dick. Or dickhead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YDogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. Westminster Kennel Club broadcasters unavailable for comment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. I'm sure they love bitch's too.
No Good Stud Dog can compete against a Fine Bitch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #26
33. The plural of "bitch" is "bitches." Not "bitch's."
That is all. Thanks very much.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. Because it is often followed by slap
both literally and figuratively. It is also used in prisons to refer to someone who is being sexually subjugated.

It can be used in a harmless manner, such as "That's a bitchin car", but in general, when directed at a woman, it is a sign of contempt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Levgreee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. "when directed at a woman, it is a sign of contempt." So you can't have contempt towards a woman?
Edited on Sun Apr-20-08 08:17 PM by Levgreee
I have contempt for some woman, as I do for some men also.

Why is that a sexist sign of contempt, instead of just a sign of contempt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. It has been used for about 200 years as a derogotary term for women.
It denotes ownership. It was used to describe female slaves. It also refers to female dogs (see post above). Do a little research on the word. It has quite a history.

Those who it is used against have sometime taken possession of it, just as some of the AA community have taken possession of nigger. It is an attempt to give it less power.

You can try and convince yourself that it is not sexist, but it is. Any language which has the intent of keeping a group down, minimizing them or harming them just because they are members of that group is ____ist.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erin Elizabeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
21. I've called a man a bitch before.
And I've called women assholes.

Is that ok?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. Asshole is gender-neutral , so it's my go-to derogatory term.
The Terminator was programmed to say "fuck you, asshole" because it's gender-neutral and therefore non-sexist. For a primitive cyborg, he was surprisingly politically-correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Machines have no gender.
It wasn't a matter of being politically correct, it was just easier to program one insult than several. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
25. It doesn't if you are talking about a female dog I guess - a person - absolutely!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
28. Life's A Bitch...
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yewberry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
30. It relies on femaleness for its negative weight.
The term asserts that femaleness itself is negative enough to be a slur. When the word is used, it defines the object as female or as having female characteristics.

When you call someone a stupid elitist liar, you are assigning negatives based on a person; when you call someone a bitch, you are assigning and defining negatives based on gender. And that's misogyny, simple enough.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. Can't it be argued
Edited on Mon Apr-21-08 11:30 AM by dbmk
.. that you are assigning and defining negatives - and then use the gender specific word to imply them. Because the recipient is of that gender, but not implying that any of those negatives stem from that fact.

Ive seen Hillary fans describe her as a Goddess - in varying degrees of seriousness granted - but is that not also sexist then?
Or is it only sexist when its meant to imply bad characteristics?

I do see issues with the use of the word - because it has been and is used still, by some men to degrade women with characteristics, that they would never attack a man for having. In general it comes in play much faster than a similar would would do against a man, I will give you that. In general.

But ultimately I don't see many words as being sexist in themselves. I don't agree that it relies on its attribution to the female sex for its negativeness. It relies on the connotations of what KIND of female you envision when using the word.
Just like dickhead does not rely on the maleness of the word for its perception.

The very characteristics the two words are meant to imply might very well be the same, whether in a man or a woman, and therefore not genderspecific. Theres just a genderspecific word to convey it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yewberry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. I think that argument can be made
but to my mind, it's more generally about femaleness and less about characteristics. A more extreme example is the word cunt--in that case, the negative is based in the sexual organ of femaleness, but the mechanism is very similar. It's the femaleness that is the root of the slur.

In the case of goddess, though, I think there's something different going on. When we use female forms of male-referenced neutrals (goddess v. god, waitress v. waiter, comedienne v. comedian, etc.), the existence of those terms might be inherently sexist, but the use isn't. Because terms for males are the root forms and the terms for female versions of those forms are clearly defined, it just wouldn't be seen as correct to call Clinton a god or a waiter or a prince. The meanings are understood and not particularly flexible.

I really see where you're coming from, though--I just think we disagree. Nothing wrong with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
37. The b-word has been used for centuries to dehumanize women.
There's no getting around that emotional baggage, except in rare exceptions. It can be like the crack of a whip, and a woman may hear in it every misogynist man who ever tried to make her feel worthless. There may be no way to use it lightly, depending upon who's listening.

Tina Fey and Meredith Brooks can use it as a rallying cry, to reclaim it. Use it on DU among people who are not very clear about the context, and you risk being labeled sexist--particularly if you show no awareness that it can be so deeply offensive, and try to justify it by comparing it to other hate-speech. (Not aiming this sentence at you; it's just my opinion on how it works.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
38. It is a sexist term. But it is so much a part of pop culture that a nonsexist person might use it
I believe that the term bitch is sexist. But I also believe that people use it without considering what it means and that people can use it without sexist intent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. I think you have hit the nail on the head.
"I believe that the term bitch is sexist. But I also believe that people use it without considering what it means and that people can use it without sexist intent."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mezzo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
39. Why does using the n-word make someone racist? nt
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
43. I always thought it referred to someone with a nasty disposition
Much like you might refer to a man as a 'prick' or a 'dick'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC