Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anybody still buying the Gibson capital gains tax bullshit?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 05:03 AM
Original message
Anybody still buying the Gibson capital gains tax bullshit?
Here's all you need to know--

http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/sheep-back-to-the-slaughter-lessons-from-the-great-depression-part-viii-all-the-change-and-bear-market-rallies/

The percentage of Americans who owned stocks, either directly or through a mutual fund, fell by 3.3 percentage points to 48.6 percent in 2004, down from 51.9 percent in 2001.

Stock ownership rates were highest in 2004 among families with higher incomes and families aged 55 to 64. Overall median stock holdings fell to $24,300 in 2004, down from $36,700 in 2001.

With baby boomers turning 60 this year and nearing retirement, the survey found that the percentage of families with some type of tax-deferred retirement account, such as a 401k, fell by 2.5 percentage points to 49.7 percent of all families.

However, those who had retirement accounts saw their holdings increase. The median for holdings in retirement accounts rose by 13.9 percent to $35,200.”

Of course Charlie Gibson in his liberal elite silo of friends and influence keeps forgetting that he asks questions that normally pertain to only 10 percent of the United States population:

“…So the rules in Washington — the tax code has been written on behalf of the well connected. Our trade laws have — same thing has happened. And part of how we’re going to be able to deliver on middle-class tax relief is to change how business is done in Washington. And that’s been a central focus of our campaign.

“MR. GIBSON: Senator Obama, you both have now just taken this pledge on people under $250,000 and 200-and-what, 250,000.

SENATOR OBAMA: Well, it depends on how you calculate it. But it would be between 200 and 250,000.

MR. GIBSON: All right.

You have however said you would favor an increase in the capital gains tax. As a matter of fact, you said on CNBC, and I quote, “I certainly would not go above what existed under Bill Clinton, which was 28 percent.”

It’s now 15 percent. That’s almost a doubling if you went to 28 percent. But actually Bill Clinton in 1997 signed legislation that dropped the capital gains tax to 20 percent.”

Did we not just look at the median stock holdings for most Americans? Let us say you kicked royal butt on that $24,300 stock holdings and gained 10 percent over the year. So now you decide to cash out and sell all your $26,730 of stock holdings. You are taxed on the gains of course and you made $2,430. The difference between 15 percent and 28 percent is a whopping $315! People are paying that in one month by:

1. Lost earning power and stagnant wages

2. U.S. Dollar going south to Cabo in Baja California

3. Higher fuel costs

4. Higher food costs

Yet the media again fails to look at the damn facts. In fact, most Americans have their wealth stored in the equity in their home. That is why the housing bubble bursting is so painful and why it is so utterly frustrating to hear the economically devoid media from digging deeper into the data. During the debate housing came up for about one minute! Yelling no more taxes is a pathetic rally cry that no longer holds water. Folks are wising up that inflation is a shadow tax that penalizes main street U.S.A and caters to those on Wall Street.










Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Gibson is not a liberal. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. True, but there was some post yesterday (can't find it) that insisted--
--that Dems ought to understand how important reducing the capital gains tax is to "middle class" people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC