Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Using Farrakhan Against ANYONE is sorta creepy.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 01:11 PM
Original message
Using Farrakhan Against ANYONE is sorta creepy.
He's not exactly been selected as someone's runningmate, forgodssakes.

This BLATANTLY plays into rascism and appeals to the worst in white people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. The relationship that Obama has to Farrakhan is through his Pastor....
the fact that his pastor knows Farrahkan. Wright isn't running either, but you would never know it by listening to weeks and weeks of blatant propaganda.

To believe that Hillary sat on the stage and requested, and her campaign sat on the phone talking to meda requesting that the media seek answers to Obama's (non existent) ties to Farrakhan, when Obama doesn't really know him is what is creepy. Hillary asked that Obama renounce and denounce Farrakhan at a debate. He did....although he didn't really have any ties to him.

Just like the fact that Rev. Wright was sitting next to Hillary Clinton at the WH during Bill's Monica Hour of prayer and need breakfast, yet she has never mentioned that he was there is also creepy.

The racism that appeals to White People has been played by the Hillary campaign.

The fact that it is finally being reported that they obviously used the racism White People have against Farrakhan to try to make Obama look less patriotic is what is creepy.

Hillary Clinton is creepy
Ed Rendell is creepy

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nothing creepy or racist about pointing
Edited on Mon Apr-21-08 01:41 PM by leftynyc
out that Farrakhan called Judaism a "gutter religion" and called Jews "bloodsuckers". If Sen Obama had not denounced him, there was no way I would have voted for him. But since he has, I don't have that problem. Farrakhan is a pig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 01:42 PM
Original message
delete
Edited on Mon Apr-21-08 01:42 PM by redqueen
dupe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And McCain REFUSED to denounce Hagee for saying the Catholic Church was The Whore.
Mighty nice of ole Stephalococcus to give him a pass on that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I'm not voting for McCain so
I don't give a shit what he does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Uh... did I say you were? WTF... we're not allowed to talk about McCain here?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. No - I didn't mean to imply that
Just that mccain could sup with Satan and I wouldn't give a shit - there is no way he would get my vote. Sen Obama and Sen Clinton on the other hand would have to step up on the issue before I could vote for either one. That's all I'm saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Do you think its okay for big media to give McCain a pass on that? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Of course not
And if the media continues to give him a free pass, that's our first 527 ad. The Catholic vote has been a swing vote for several elections - his humping for the support of someone who called the church the whore of babylon is very relevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Ohhhh...
I'm just still pissed that whore gave McCain such a free pass.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. and Ed Rendall?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. What about him? (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Gov Ed Rendall didn't denounce him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. I have no idea
I'm not being asked to vote for Rendall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itcfish Donating Member (805 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. And Very Stupid
since there has been a connection between Obama and Farakhan. Why try to use it against Hillary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diamond Dog Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Because there's a connection between Farrakhan and Clinton through Rendell as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. really? what's the connection? do tell.
not that you will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Why did Hillary try to use it against Obama?
When her main ally in PA praised Farrakhan & Nation of Islam to the skies with Farrakhan in attendance.

The issue is Clinton's hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. What 'connection'?...
Edited on Mon Apr-21-08 02:22 PM by stillcool47
Do you mean because the guy made an unsolicited endorsement? Hillary chose to smear Senator Obama for something that he had no control over. Quite a bit different from Governor Rendell, Hillary's good buddy, applauding Farakhan's good works. Is he a terrorist when he endorses Obama, and 'no big deal' when he's honored by Rendell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. I don't see how it plays into racism.
Farrakhan has repeatedly shown himself to be a bigot. I do agree it's sorta creepy as he's unconnected with either candidate, except in the most tangential of ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diamond Dog Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. That's the point.
What's good for the goose is good for the gander. The Clintonistas cannot possibly use it against Obama, due to Wright's connection with Obama and Farrakhan, without bringing up the issue of her own surrogate's support of him as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC