Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Time: Is Kerry Leaving Blacks Cold?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 09:43 AM
Original message
Time: Is Kerry Leaving Blacks Cold?
Snip:
Because black voters are more opposed to President Bush than is almost any other voting bloc (I actually think muslims now have them beat), John Kerry's first move to secure their enthusiastic support might have been simply to follow Hippocrates' instruction: do no harm. But when he appeared before the National Conference of Black Mayors in April, Kerry chose to speak not about their concerns but about his plan to make the U.S>'s chemical plants more secure--leaving the audience underwhelmed. And when Kerry's campaign manager, Mary Beth Cahill, listed his top election strategists, it revealed that the group of six was all white, angering black activists who feel the Democratic party takes African Americans for granted...

http://www.time.com/time/election2004/article/0,18471,658329,00.html

I don't worry about Kerry getting 90% of the African-American vote. The question is will it be 90% of 10,000,000--the number of AA or 90% of 8,000,000--turnout is critical and Clinton and Gore were able to really motivate African-American turnout--I'm not sure Kerry (as yet) is catching on in the same way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm not sure if he's catching on with any liberal/progressive group
either.

All you hear about is swing votes he's courting, as well as veterans. He does seem to be taking the base for granted.

Speaking for myself, I've volunteered the past several presidential elections and giving money. Can't see myself doing that now. Sure, I'm voting for Kerry, but that's about it right now. I can easily change my mind later on (about money/volunteering), but nothing so far has gotten me excited about his candidacy, other than I think he'll beat Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kerry got large majority of black and other minority turnout in the
primaries. in most states kerry got 60 percent or more of the black voters. there is no doubt he can turn out the vote. i believe that time in april was when he focused on national security issues. yesterday at the rainbow push coalition he focused more on issues that specifically affect minorities as he has been doing more recently with all groups of people .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. As noted he can get a large percentage of their votes
but it is turnout which is may be lagging as with any voting bloc if they are not enthused by the candidate. In the later primaries as well I think Kerry was aided by a bandwagon effect too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Note to Mr. Kerry: Please take Harold Ford under your wing
...and groom him. He is a smart congressman, a rising star and could likely help turn out the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Harold Ford was one of Kerry's earliest supporters
he stuck with Kerry through the good and bad times. he went to other states to campaign for him and did many other things. i remember he was the one who was always on tv and defending kerry and even when people talked about how kerry's campaign was over and he was low in the polls, ford continued working hard for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BayCityProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Kerry needs to ratchet up support
for affordable child care, housing, abolishing death penalty and racial profiling, and supporting affirmative action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soloflecks Donating Member (518 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. One woman interviewed put it very well.
Heard last night on CBS, I think. I believe she was asked about Clinton vs Kerry on attending an African-American church. She said one reaches for the hymnal and starts to sing, and the other has to be offered a hymnal and prompted to sing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Kerry isn't a very openly religious guy, and he is Catholic
where the worshippers are more reserved.and he also grew up where seapration of church and state was a big thing and religious worship is more of a private thing. but kerry has attended many black churches and will continue to. but if they are expecting him to "preach" like clinton did, he isn't going to do it because that's just not him. he will be himself and try to get support that way. and he does a pretty good job of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. And yet
Kerry has done more for the minority communities than Clinton. SCHIP, YouthBuild, microloan program, minority small business assistance, empowerment zones, school building programs, national housing trust, cops on the street, all started by Kerry or programs he's fought for. Kerry's that guy who is busy watching over the building fund to put the roof on the church, not very sexy but just as caring and maybe more important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. see post #13
and you are right kerry has done a lot more which is why he did so well with minority voters. these articles always ignore the things kerry did. it's not really balanced. and when kerry does go to events with many blacks or other minorities they call it pandering to the blacks.

but as shown in post 13 kerry has proved he can get out the vote and does well with minorities and he will do it again this time.

and he is not ignoring anyone. these articles always talk about unnamed sources which tell nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Uhm, preaching to the choir
But you knew that, right? :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. Race makes decision between Gep, Edwards, et al, interesting.
I heard during the primaries that Edwards has had more black votes for him than all the other candidates combined.

North Carolina had a 2000 population of 8,049,313, which was 72.1% white, and 21.6% black (about 1.7 million). (http://www.census.gov/population/cen2000/phc-t6/tab02.txt)

Gep's congressional district is only 9.7% black (60,000), and it's 88% white. (http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/QTTable?_bm=y&-state=qt&-context=qt&-qr_name=DEC_2000_108H_QTP5&-ds_name=DEC_2000_108H&-tree_id=601&-redoLog=false&-_caller=geoselect&-geo_id=500$50000US2903&-format=&-_lang=en)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. no, Kerry got a lot more
in south carolina edwards got 37 percent while Kerry got 34 percent.

in tennessee Kerry got 47 percent while Edwards got 15 percent.

in virginia Kerry got 61 percent while Edwards got 20 percent.

in wisconsin Kerry got 55 percent while Edwards got 15 percent.

in georgia Kerry got 61 percent while Edwards got 25 percent.

in Ohio Kerry got 60 percent while Edwards got 24 percent.

as you can see, Kerry did a lot better among minority voters itself than white voters or combined.

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/primaries/pages/epolls/OH/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. No, I mean in their respective elections in their careers.
Edited on Wed Jun-30-04 12:11 PM by AP
and not in the primaries.

Edwards might have gotten as much as 1 million black votes in his one senate election. I think I read that that was more than all the other's combined, but that must have been in each one's most recent election. However, it's possible that Gephardt only has maybe 350,000 career black votes.

If you count by the number of individuals and not the number of times they've voted, Edwards might still be out front (eg, Gep might have only about 45K unique black voters, while Edwards has 1.1-1.25 million. I don't know what demographics are in Mass, but NC has more EVs, I believe, so Edwards could still be ahead of Kerry there, and I doubt that the black vote has ever been the make or break vote for Kerry as it was with Edwards in 98 -- after Gant's two elections, black voters were motivated to get Edwards a win; he really delivered for black voters more than anyone else).

It was the black vote in NC that won him that race in '98.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. Uhm, think you heard wrong
Kerry beat Edwards in the south with the black vote. He beat both Gep & Dean with the union vote. He led with women's vote and even young people. Edwards got the centrist white vote, particularly rural white vote. That's always been Edwards' strong suit to me, his ability to reach those rural people who have felt ignored by the Dem party for such a long time. Kerry can put together a strong minority base and Edwards can take the message to those voters who used to be Dem and should be again. It's a winning strategy I think. But I don't know what the campaign has in mind, so I'm just blabbering anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
10. Remember all the similar stories about Al Gore?
I think all Dems need to do more to address concerns of black voters however I don't believe this article. It's just too similar to the junk they put out about Gore. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. not really
I don't think African-Americans were ever turned off by Gore--I do recall stories about other liberal elements of the party however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. there were stories out then
especially after he picked lieberman about how the blacks were angry and other crap. of course none of it was true.

just as much of this on kerry isn't true. he has proven he does very well among minorities in the primaries and he will prove it again in the general election. and it wasn't just bandwagon since he did significantly better among black voters than all voters as a whole. he did very well among women and latinos also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. Many of the stories were about how Gore did not have the
same appeal as Clinton. Then the myriad of stories about how Lieberman insulted black voters. All of that may be true, but turnout was astounding in the 2000 election.

I think Kerry needs to come out strongly about the disenfranchisement of African-American voters. How all Americans are valued and to reach out to this constituency in myriad ways. However, I just doubt the gloom and doom articles at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
17. Time has done it's part to discourage black voters thus helping Bush.
Thank YOU Time Magazine from the Bush/Cheney 04 campaign :toast:

"The Kerry campaign badly wants to assure African Americans that they have access to and the attention of the candidate. Kerry aides say Congressional Black Caucus chair Elijah Cummings, Representative Greg Meeks of New York City and deputy campaign manager Marcus Jadotte, all African Americans, are among those who talk with the candidate on his ever-present cell phone. Top campaign officials meet with the caucus every two weeks. Vernon Jordan, a former Clinton aide and a prominent black lawyer, was named last week to head the campaign's presidential-debate negotiating team."

More of the painting of Kerry as an out of touch elitist by the press. ZZZZZZ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. notice the disconnect between the headline and what is actually happening
in the campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. I did. I can smell the spin. KERRY - ELITIST - OUT OF TOUCH -
ALOOF - UNLIKABLE, LIBERAL. :eyes:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
22. Progressive1: "Is Time Magazine Subtlely Shilling for George Bush"?
I read The Nation!

Time is Toilet Paper!

:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
24. Bu$h will leave 3/4 of all Americans cold, as in unable to pay for heating
their homes.

Yuh. Voting for Bu$h, or not voting at all, is a great idea for minorities.

Hey, kids! Try the new Jim Jones flavor Kool Aid, available only at your local RNC distributor.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC