Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton to innocent Iranian sons, daughters, mothers, and fathers: We will obliterate you.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
datopbanana Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 12:31 AM
Original message
Clinton to innocent Iranian sons, daughters, mothers, and fathers: We will obliterate you.
Because your government f*cked up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. NO: because Hillary lies about the Iranian Nuclear program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datopbanana Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. she's trying to one up herself on fanning the flames of anti-American sentiment
authorizing a war in iraq wasn't enough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. I have always thought she was a blood-stained Valkyrie
but the Valkyries have too much honor to include her in their august company. Not pleasing enough in voice to be a Siren. Perhaps she is a Medusa!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good luck with that, Hil.
Over my cold dead one. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UndertheOcean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. How much she kills does not matter to her
Edited on Tue Apr-22-08 01:21 AM by UndertheOcean
she only cares about winning the AIPAC/NEOCON/REDNECK vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. She becomes more and more repulsive by the day
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
7. Collateral damage.
She still approves of it everyday in a war she voted for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. Obama's no dove on Iran
Obama to AIPAC:

“The world must work to stop Iran's uranium enrichment program and prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. It is far too dangerous to have nuclear weapons in the hands of a radical theocracy,” he said.

Even though all options were on the table, Obama said the utmost efforts should be devoted to “sustained and aggressive diplomacy combined with tough sanctions”.

Obama stressed the importance of preventing Iran’s nuclear armament, which could lead weapons of mass destruction into the hands of terrorists, inevitably causing other Middle East nations to join the race for nuclear weapons. “

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/1,7340,L-3371763,00.html


and this:

Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, said that he would work to keep nuclear weapons out of the hands of the Iranians but that he would "take no options off the table when it comes to preventing them from using nuclear weapons or obtaining nuclear weapons, and that would include any threats directed at Israel or any of our allies in the region."

Iran need understand, he said, "that an attack on Israel is an attack on our strongest ally in the region, ...one whose security we consider paramount, and ...that would be an act of aggression that...I would consider an attack that is unacceptable, and the United States would take appropriate action."

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/04/clintons-umbrel.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datopbanana Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Aug. 3, 2007 Obama: No nukes
"I think it would be a profound mistake for us to use nuclear weapons in any circumstance," Obama said, with a pause, "involving civilians."


He's talking about about fighting terrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan but he's making a morality argument here so I assume is applies all over.

Of course he took a lot of criticism from HRC for this so he's backed away from it.


http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/08/03/politics/main3130942.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. He said ALL options are on the table in 2008 for Iran
Edited on Tue Apr-22-08 01:38 AM by bigtree
the other comment was about use of nukes against terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datopbanana Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. He's only saying that so HRC won't attack him over it again. He...
showed us how he thinks when he voted to ban cluster bombs (HRC didn't) and said no nukes against civilians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. so he's for 'surgical' nuke strikes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. And Clinton criticized him for being insufficiently hawkish on nuke posture
Never mind that nuke posture NEVER allowed unilateral nuke response to
conventional threats during the Cold War, placing your candidate to the
right of Nixon and WELL to the right of Reagan (who attended a conference
in Reykjavik where Gorby persuaded him to BAN nukes before his neocon
handlers got to work on him.) The one good thing Reagan ever did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datopbanana Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. I can't believe you think "obliterating" a country is the right position
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #20
31. that's not what I've posted here. try some honesty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #13
23. So it's okay for him to say it
because he's lying. Gotcha.

Both of them with their appeals to the sabre-rattlers are making me grimace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datopbanana Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. He didn't SAY he'd obliterate an entire country. He didn't lie he's not talking about it anymor
Edited on Tue Apr-22-08 02:56 AM by datopbanana
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. So "all options" now means "not ALL options"?
And what does not talking about it "anymore" have to do with what he said and what you've asserted he meant?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datopbanana Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. saying all options is COMPLETELY different than what HRC said.
Saying you WON'T RULE SOMETHING OUT is different than saying you're FOR something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. And all Iran has to do is "consider" attacking Israel before they are blown off the planet.
Sound like Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. of course, that's not her position.
Edited on Tue Apr-22-08 02:00 AM by bigtree
Speaking at a meeting of newspaper publishers, Clinton sought to strike a balance between the hawkish approach taken by the Bush administration and her Democratic rival Barack Obama's call for face-to-face talks with the Iranian president.

"The approach that the Bush administration has taken toward Iran has been a loser. It has neither changed behaviors or produced results," said Clinton, a former first lady who would be the first woman president.

"I've advocated both that carrot and that stick, and I think that would be what I (would) take to try to create the beginning of lower levels of diplomatic engagement, some ongoing process," the New York senator said.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080415/pl_nm/usa_politics_clinton_iran_dc




Clinton: No Military Action on Iran Without Congressional Authority

Iran is a Threat but U.S. Must Proceed Wisely Before Acting in Light of White House Blunders in Iraq

http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=269287&&

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxmyth Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
9. Obama to Israel, If Iran nukes you then I will talk to them sternly
Give me a break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datopbanana Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Clinton to Iranians, If Iran nukes Israel then I will kill you and your children.
Give me a break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxmyth Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. That is certainly more of a deterrent
than having them think a President Obama would let them do it with impunity. I guess he meant he would be using a switch instead of a stick when he used the phrase "offer them carrots and sticks".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datopbanana Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. lol why don't we nuke all their allies too. It's an unacceptable solution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxmyth Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Why do Obama supporters love nuclear weapons?
It's actually kind of frightening. It's not Senator Clinton that said "I will obliterate every man, woman and child and the entire countryside in Iran with nuclear weapons" or anything even remotely similar. It's all the Obama supporters that are saying that's what she MEANT.

It was a rhetorical question answered with political rhetoric albeit tougher rhetoric than "appropriate response" or "take no options off the table".

Either Senator Obama supporters are mindreaders to have gleaned this from what Senator Clinton said, or they are bullshitting just to make her look bad, or they are complete fools. Choose one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datopbanana Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Obama said "no nukes" Clinton said "obliterate" iran. Choose one
oh and

"It's all the Obama supporters that are saying that's what she MEANT.

Either Senator Obama supporters are mindreaders to have gleaned this from what Senator Clinton said, or they are bullshitting just to make her look bad, or they are complete fools."


That is exactly what Hillary (and her supporters) did with baracks bitter remarks. So don't claim clinton supporters are in any way more honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxmyth Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. Senator Obama ruled out a nuclear response if Iran attacks Israel with nuclear weapons?
This is very important information. The American people need to be clear on this. The Israeli Government and the Israeli people need to be clear on this. Anyone seeking to develop nuclear weapons in Iran needs to be clear on this.

Very important information that needs to be spread far and wide so there can be no mistake in what Senator Obama really meant by taking no options off of the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. We kill children on a regular basis, just to prove we aren't bluffing
Oh yeah, and also because US military officer structure assumes
a war every 10 years and would collapse in the absence of such.

God Damn America for killing children? NO, and not Bless America either.

America does not EXIST except in people's heads. It is a reified concept.

As Thomas Jefferson and Thomas Paine emphasized.

All that exists is the Land, and a few shared cultural values most of which
capitalism has assiduously worked to obliterate and replace with a default,
de facto culture of conformity and mindless acceptance of injustice.

God Damn individual PEOPLE who seek to nuke 70 million innocent civilians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
26. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 03:12 AM
Response to Original message
29. riiiiight!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC