Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Main reason iran wants nukes is because pakistan has nukes, which got nukes....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
george_maniakes Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 06:17 AM
Original message
Main reason iran wants nukes is because pakistan has nukes, which got nukes....
because india got nukes, which got nukes because china got them, and so on. If Iran gets nukes, the arab gulf states will aquire them too, which is why its important to handle this diplomatically. As in quietly acknowledging , yes, its not fair israel has nukes and you dont, but the more countries have nukes, the less safe we all are. Which is why the UN, which was created with the purpose of guaranteeing the sovereignty of current borders, is so important, and why bush did so much harm to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Someone has to take Israel to task finally
I doubt it will be Obama or Clinton but when we start promising to "Obliterate" an entire country to defend an ally that is perfectly capable of doing it themselves then something is seriously wrong. Obliterating Iran will turn Russia and China against us immediately and I guarantee that's a fight we can't win. The world can't win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
george_maniakes Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 06:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. If iran launched nukes against israel...
israel would obliterate iran, guaranteed. In which case, there'd be nuclear fallout from 50-100 nukes going off in so small an area, and so the whole middle east would be fucked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's why Im saying it would be ludicris to add more to the mix
As long as the US is not percieved to be involved maybe we won't have to have WWIII over it. I'm beginning to think that's what some people want though. I think the de-population agenda is in full swing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yeah, who needs a country full of fucking Jews anyway, right? Right?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC