|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
jezebel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 06:34 PM Original message |
58% of the vote was women, 42 %men. If Clinton won women by 11% how does this work out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
1. Are you speaking of White women only |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoesTo11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
2. Clinton wins by 11% x 58% + 42% x Z, where Z is her lead among men |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jezebel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 06:37 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Drudge (yuck I know) has Clinton winning women by 11, and Obama winning men by 6 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 06:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Maybe we could use a recent... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoesTo11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 06:42 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. Per first response above has Z = -6% so total about + 4% for HRC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 06:44 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Wow. Is that the answer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democraticinsurgent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
5. close |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas Hill Country (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 06:40 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. i would say that 85% of remaining 20% is high... prolly closer to 75%... but yeah, close. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johnny__Motown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
6. Umm.. kinda looks like a close race to me. If you use the 50k income number.. that is a pretty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
7. We don't know without knowing how the men split |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johnny__Motown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
9. MSNBC has slightly different numbers... under 50k 45% over 50k 55% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:17 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC