Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Howard Dean or The Clintons? Who Should Chair the Democratic Party?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 06:50 PM
Original message
Poll question: Howard Dean or The Clintons? Who Should Chair the Democratic Party?
Edited on Tue Apr-22-08 06:54 PM by David Zephyr
Lanny Davis, a Clinton operative, has now joined the Clintons' other operatives like James Carville and Harold Ford, Jr. in calling for Howard Dean to resign.

Seeing as to how Bill Clinton himself tried to get Wes Clark to challenge Howard Dean at the last moment for the Chairmanship of the Democratic National Party, I think that it is obvious that the Clintons despise Howard Dean.

I, for one, am grateful to Governor Howard Dean for bravely challenging the status quo and for his 50-State Strategy which won back the Senate and the House of Representatives in 2006.

I, for one, am grateful for how Howard Dean has led our party to the largest voter registration in the nation's history.

I, for one, am grateful that Howard Dean has made fund raising at the grass roots the keystone to our Party's successes.

And, yes, I am grateful to have a Chair of the National Democratic Party who opposed the god damned war in Iraq BEFORE it ever began.

And, while I am at it, if there was a particular family who would be titular in our party, it would be the Kennedys, not the Clintons.

So since the Clintons are intent on driving Howard Dean from his Chairmanship and are relentless in their calls for him to resign, I ask the following:

Who makes a better head of our party: Howard Dean or the Clintons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. How many battles do they want to lose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. The DLC sees a real threat in Howard Dean. They'll stop at nothing to destroy him.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
24. Yes, and I see a real threat in the DLC. I'll stop at nothing to destroy them. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Link for people...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrgorth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
57. If they want open war within the party
they can have it. I've got Dean's back NO MATTER WHAT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. He did a lot of good
but he really did mess up the florida and michigan mess. We should have done exactly what the GOP did. Take away half.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. He didn't mess anything up - they tried to play chicken
and he didn't back down. They knew the rules and tried to game the system. He has been consistent all the way through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. no he upped the penalty
the penalty was supposed to be half but he doubled it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. The rules committee upped it....it was well within the rules. FL knew it.
They had 30 days to get their delegates back, they did not try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. If he had told them not to, they wouldn't have
It was a stupid game of chicken for which they share responsibility but the final product is a totally disenfranchised electorate that had no fault in the disenfranchisement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. The only stupidity going on
was done by the Dem "leaders" in Florida. Everyone voted on the rules long before the campaigns began in earnest. If they din't want to be penalized, they should not have voted for the rules.

So don't you dare try and push any crap onto Howard Dean. Actually, I'm rather surprised at you for saying what you did.

Shame on you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. they deserved the penalty they were told they would get
not a doubled one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. I disagree
They broke the rules. They deserve the penalty.

You're a teacher. Would you allow your students to break the rules after they've voted on them? Would you give them a do over because they cried and whimpered, "Not fair"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. I wouldn't arbitraily double the penalty
I can't tell a student that if s/he is tardy to my class s/he gets a half hour detention and then turn around and give him/her an hour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #30
52. Both states KNEW EXACTLY what the penalty was.
It's not like it was an "arbitrary" surprise.

Hell, the candidates themselves PLEDGED NOT TO
PARTICIPATE in those primaries!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. FL and MI deliberately broke the rules and disrupted the primary process.
I am amazed at how many think that is ok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. I don't think it is OK
but say I had your daughter in my class and said "if you cheat on a test, you fail the test and I can do more if I feel like". Your daughter cheats on a test I and fail her for the class. That is what happened here. There was one predetermined penalty that got arbitratilly doubled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Not arbitrary...FL went before the committee and did not tell the truth.
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/madfloridian/1935

The committee had the facts, and they gave the penalty. FL could have kept their delegates if they addressed the problems within 30 days.
They chose to be arrogant about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #22
50. look you don't know what you're talking-DEAN GAVE THEM A CHANCE TO GET BACK IN
Florida and Michigan had a chance to get back in the game and they refused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #18
55. Not true at all
The Chair doesn't carry that sort of influence.

I'm so afraid we bandy about the term Disenfranchise way too easily. It's too serious a concept to use when it really doesn't apply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #10
49. Dean didn't do that
The committee did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Governor, Doctor Howard Dean
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Dr. Dean, from the DEMOCRATIC wing of the Democratic Party!
The Clintons, from the DLC Repug-lite wing of the Democatic Party.

God bless Howard Dean!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. Anything Lanny Davis and Carvile are for, I'm against.
That includes getting Howard Dean to resign and nominating Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. Disregarding issues of personality,
...it seems apparent that the Dean 50-state model is paying more dividends than the DLC targeted-states model, at least at this point in time, so Dean should keep control of the DNC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DogPoundPup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think this sums it up nicely.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. 50 state strategy DEAN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #12
31. That's 48 now. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. The Clintons were and are a disaster for the Party.
Edited on Tue Apr-22-08 07:12 PM by TexasObserver
It'a always all about them. That's why McAwful is the worst DNC chair we've had in decades. Chuck Manatt. They lost us seats and set us up for the problems of 2000 and 2002. Paul Kirk. Both better chairs.

The sooner the name Clinton is no longer identified with the party, the sooner we are BACK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #13
35. It's funny how people bought the spin that the DLC was good for the party
when in fact they were good for the Clintons and their cronies and horrible for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. The Democratic VOTERS wanted Dean
he's the biggest threat there could be to the Clinton's power so they want him out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. 96% for Dean and 4% for the Clintons. Kick this up. Hopefully Howard might see it.
Kick it up for Howard. I like our boss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
16. So the DLC operatives are trying to take over the DNC,
it would appear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
20. Without Howard Dean, there would be no Democratic Party today.
He was the first one to show any kind of leadership in this party this decade. Barack Obama was the second. I hope President Obama asks Dr. Dean to stay on as DNC chair, and I hope he accepts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
26. I've always supported the Clintons, but Howard Dean has proven himself...
as Chair.

I was glad to see him get it and he's continued to do a fantastic job from the beginning.

Bill Clinton was a skeptic of Dean's 50 State Strategy and after a meeting with Howard, he became a believer.

Rock on, Howard!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Dawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
27. DLC = GOP
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
28. Whoever is the nominee will select the DNC chairperson.....Dean could be reappointed
but thats unlikely. Too bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #28
43. You're right - our Democratic President will probably nominate the new Chair
I'm assuming we will win.

I haven't heard any names being bandied about, though. Not even whispers.

I have heard that Dean doesn't want the job again. Rumor only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
32. Howard Dean thinks the race should end before 9 states have voted...
so f him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #32
39. She can't win. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. based on projected races in the last 9 states, but those may not hold...
she can overcome him in the pop. vote. and if she doesn't, she doesn't, but millions more people have left to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #32
51. Fuck anyone who doesn't understand that Clinton lost and is draining resources from November
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
33. Kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
34. they want him replaced with someone who gives her Florida and Michigan delegates
that's what this is about.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
36. 150-9?
where are all the hillary supporters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
37. I voted dean however
I wish there had been a John Edwards option, I like him more and it made me sad that he had to pull out of the race for president so soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
38. Howard Dean will fuck your shit up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #38
54. Hey, I have that printed out and in my Dean file!
Ran across it the other day when I was looking for
something.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #54
58. An excellent addition to any collection.
Certrainly a must-have for any self-respecting Deaniac. :toast: :hi:

Cheers,
Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
40. Dean: 169. Clintons: 10 The DU is Dean Country.
Looks like the DU favors Howard Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. So, what are we going to do about it?
Because the pressure on / against Dean is only going to get worse heading into the convention. All I can think of is to try to raise some $ in donations of #20.08.

Is there some other way we could show support for Howard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. The DNC will vote for the Chair in January
The new DNC will be seated after the convention. Find out who the new members are in your state and lobby them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #44
47. I'm talking about the wackos like Lanny Davis call for him to resign
and other tricks coming out of the Clinton campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
45. Oye, this is way too overdramatic
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 07:03 AM by Hippo_Tron
Regardless of whether Clinton or Obama wins in 2008, Dean won't be sticking around. The incumbent President becomes the leader of the party and party chairman becomes a puppet who takes orders from the White House Political Director. Dean won't stick around for that job and he will be replaced either by Clinton or Obama.

This isn't a question of would you rather Howard Dean or Harold Ford running the party it's a question of whether you would rather have Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama running the part. Whether or not we continue the 50 state strategy and such will be determined by the new President.

BTW, Mark Penn will not be Hillary Clinton's White House Political Director. He's too cheap to work on a government salary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
46. Last time the Clintons controlled the DNC with McAuliffe we lost Congress
for a dozen years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
48. I want to GROW the party. Howard Dean speaks for me.
We lost seats in BOTH houses of congress during EVERY election when Bill was chief. Screw that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #48
56. No, we picked up House seats in 1998.
Newtie resigned in response to that historic loss--the first time since the 1820s that the opposition party lost in a second term off year election.

And growing the party by excluding two of the largest states--about 10% of American voters--is a bizarre strategy.

I used to be a big Howard Dean fan and was thrilled when he was made chairman, but now I see him as Katherine Harris with a penis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #56
59. Conceded, but we lost in aggregate.
The party wouldn't be where it is without the 50 state strategy.

Think about Il-14

I don't want the Clintons anywhere near the helm. Their boy Terry screwed things up royally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
53. I think those that want to oust Dean are looking to put Bill in his chair
Or better yet, a Clinton puppet. I hope it doesn't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC