MSNBC - TO Early to call for Clinton from To close to call

[Ioo]

So looks like Clinton is going to win

[IndependentDem]

1. yep... now its just by how much. n/t

[LSparkle]

2. I'm sorry -- that's just verbiage

If it's too EARLY to call then it IS too close to call.
I've seen them call races RIGHT after the polls close, if
they're CERTAIN one candidate is going to win. If they
weren't afraid that Obama MIGHT win, then they'd go ahead
and call it for her.

They're trying to soften the blow for the Clinton supporters,
that's all.

[Azathoth]

3. It's 0% reporting for God's sake

They've counted a grand total of 2500 votes.

Give it time.

[ErinBerin84]

4. yeah, I never understand that

Shouldn't it be "too early to call" before "too close to call?"

[AlCzervik]

5. oh fab, Pat Buchana ducked away from a cross burning early tonight and there he is on the tv.

[angie_love]

6. Fuck, why didn't they just say that to begin with UGH

[tekisui]

7. 67-33 Hillary aith 0% reporting.

First numbers on MSNBC

[GOPNotForMe]

8. "too"

[BeatleBoot]

Need to run those "Messages from our Sponsors"

[ErinBerin84]

9. If I took a shot every time Pat says "He can't close the deal!"

I would be vvvasted.

At least they we get the "Insiders"; (Joe?! haha) reaction with an assumed Clinton lead, so Joe doesn't have to backtrack.

[parasim]

10. Well, that's just one precinct reporting results...

Huntingdon 1,416 to 748 votes...

according to CNN's site: http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#PA