Madam Mossfern
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 07:39 PM
Original message |
Did I just see 66-34 to Clinton????? |
SallyMander
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 07:39 PM
Response to Original message |
Fearless
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 07:39 PM
Response to Original message |
gabeana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 07:40 PM
Response to Original message |
gabeana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 07:40 PM
Response to Original message |
WillyT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 07:40 PM
Response to Original message |
HiFructosePronSyrup
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 07:40 PM
Response to Original message |
GoldieAZ49
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 07:41 PM
Response to Original message |
LSparkle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 07:41 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Who traditionally skew older (her base). Just wait; it'll change.
|
Exilednight
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
22. and reflect name recognition more than an informed decision. This is the one problem............... |
|
with absentee voting. I'm for absentee voting, but they need to push back the date of when they mail out ballots.
|
OzarkDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 07:41 PM
Response to Original message |
9. She'll do well w/ absentee voters |
|
who are the first ones to be counted.
|
WillyT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
13. I Thought It Was Absent Minded Voters ??? |
Bombtrack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 07:41 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Clinton has 66.6 percent to be precise. |
|
Don't rural precincts always show up as the first results as well?
|
Texasgal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 07:41 PM
Response to Original message |
11. I remember my first beer too. |
New Dawn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message |
|
It is hard to tell what the outcome will be until at least around 10-20% reporting.
|
high density
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Are you new to this or something? |
|
Welcome to early returns.
|
TheCowsCameHome
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 07:44 PM
Response to Original message |
15. No, it was a leftover basketball score from yesterday. |
rocktivity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 07:44 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Very interesting--that's EXACTLY the voting percentage that Hillary needs... |
|
Edited on Tue Apr-22-08 07:45 PM by rocknation
in order to call this a "real" win.
:tinfoilhat: rocknation
|
HopeforChange
(457 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
20. Told you so. That is why it took so long. The rigging begins. |
ButterflyBlood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Let's wait till the remaining 99.9% come in n/t |
indimuse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message |
Austinitis
(726 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Fox just called Penn for Hillary |
|
and don't jump on me for posting this. I'm just putting out the information, not vouching for it.
|
FSogol
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 07:48 PM
Response to Original message |
21. They must be counting Clinton's votes first. |
TheDonkey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 07:49 PM
Response to Original message |
OzarkDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 07:49 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:07 AM
Response to Original message |