The New York TIMES Op/Ed piece on the Pennsylvania outcome:

[saltpoint]

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/23/opinion/23wed1.html?th&emc=th

[grantcart]

1. great editorial and it will have a big impact

[saltpoint]

3. Agree. This is Sen. Clinton's (adopted) home state newspaper,

and a high-profile one at that.

[TwilightGardener]

2. I read that--very true. The last six weeks have been the STUPIDEST, most

uninspiring, most unenlightening, most negative, most vapid (good word!) of the campaign season to date. How much lower can it go?

[saltpoint]

5. Hi, wienerdoggie. Yep. I'm ready for it to be over.

[EFerrari]

6. They're trying to get Dean unseated so they'll have a chance

against Nancy at the convention.

I wish we could figure out a way to show support for Howard. :grr:

[saltpoint]

7. I'll come to any alley brawl in Dean's behalf. Meet ya there!

[EFerrari]

9. Seriously, I expect this to get worse. They need to get rid of Dean

so they can bully Nancy.

And to think I even donated to Ford's campaign when he was being attacked by Republicans.

[saltpoint]

12. I think your analysis is on-target. At the same time, I have a feeling

that if they try to take on Nancy there's going to be blood on the floor.

Nancy's formidable.

[Coexist]

4. wonderful

[psychopomp]

8. Your title should read: NYT: It's Time For Superdelegates to End Clinton's Destructive Campaign

[Scurrilous]

10. K & R

:thumbsup:

[anonymous171]

11. Won't matter. Hillary's newfound base doesn't read the paper.

[saltpoint]

13. They're all out duck-huntin'.

[TheDoorbellRang]

14. Sounds like New York might have a little buyer's remorse

:evilgrin: