Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hoyer: Electability Key to Democratic Choice

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 12:48 PM
Original message
Hoyer: Electability Key to Democratic Choice
"Electability." That has been the fundamental premise of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's (D-N.Y.) presidential campaign for months now, as she makes the case that, even if Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) leads in delegates or the popular vote, she should be the Democratic nominee because she has the best chance in November.

As House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) sees it, electability should also be the animating principle behind Democratic superdelegates' decisions on which candidate to support.

At his weekly press briefing today, Hoyer cited the mantra of the civil rights movement: Keep your eyes on the prize. "The prize for me is winning the November election and changing direction in this country," Hoyer said. "And as a delegate to the convention ... I intend to vote in a way that best accomplishes that objective."

Hoyer has repeatedly made clear in the past that he believes it is the responsibility of superdelegates to bring their experience and judgement to their decision, and not to necessarily be guided by metrics like the pledged delegate count or the popular vote in their respective states.

Hoyer reiterated that point again today, barely 12 hours after Clinton beat Obama by 10 points in Pennsylvania and left the contest still unsettled. But Hoyer also suggested that Democratic elected officials, unlike regular delegates, could be held accountable for their decisions in the fall. Superdelegates are "some of the few delegates who will have to go back in November and answer for the decision that they made in August. That's the irony. The rest , you know, they're going to do what they do" and they're "not going to be on the ballot," Hoyer pointed out.

---EOE---

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2008/04/hoyer_electability_key_to_demo.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who's more electable - the campaign that wins more delegates, more people...
... is flowing with cash, and has the infrastructure to raise oodles more $? Or the opposite?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. That's a tough one...
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Sure seems to be, for some unknown reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Lemme ask President Kerry about that "electability" meme. -eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Electability" is Clinton codespeak for "they wont vote for a black guy"
Thats how low the Clinton campaign will go in trying to steal the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. DLCer backing a DLCer wow there is a surprise.
and a DLC arguing that some folks are special with better insight on who and what is electable.
Wow. An Elitist DLCer? I'd never have imagined that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. She's added another 14-pts to her already basement level negative ratings.
Her campaign strategy appears to be run by a family of rabid squirrels.

She's got nothing, having rendered herself radioactive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. The rules say vote in good conscience if voting against public will is good conscienc them I am lost
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC