Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For the last freaking time, Michigan does NOT count!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Dbdmjs1022 Donating Member (369 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:02 PM
Original message
For the last freaking time, Michigan does NOT count!
I hate to burst everyone's bubble, but the bottom line is that Michigan does not, has not, and will not count. Florida at least has an outside chance because both candidates were on the ballot, but the DNC is NOT going to give Hillary a free shitload of delegates and popular vote tallies in an illegitimate primary where the current frontrunner actually followed the rules and wasn't even ON THE BALLOT! So saying that "Hillary is ahead of the popular vote counting Michigan" is like saying "Hillary is ahead in the popular vote counting all of her imaginary friends AND the voices in her head." It's not a legitimate claim, and it honestly sounds desperate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oreo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. And Hillary agrees....
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 03:05 PM by Oreo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmUVr_Qt2Wg

How do Clinton supporters spin her signing an agreement saying MI doesn't count?
Don't any of you find it a little odd that she was against them before she was for them when she realized she had no chance without them?

I'd love to hear it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. well - her point is probably that Mich will count in the GE
and after all, shouldn't we be concerned that we field a candidate that will win the GE. I mean, isn't that the whole point.

and no - I am not a Hillary supporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. MI Totals don't count, because a Judge Voided the Race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Neither does Florida
Counting Florida is based on the premise that campaigns don't serve a purpose.

No uncontested primary counts period.


For that matter the whole popular vote does not count
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Actually . . .
she only won the "voices in her head" by a 51-49 margin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. But SHE got the voices that matter...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. And Hillary agrees... Oct 2007, she said, "we all know Michigan doesn't count for anything."


By her own words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. Michigan and Florida are out, thank god, we do not need Fl of screw up another
election, their primary was not campaign due to them not being included per the rules.
They have to be out or it is another stolen campaign, Dems do not need another one do they.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Actually, the voters of both Michigan and Florida are very important...
to the party in the GE. Despite their own state party screwups, most of the Dems will vote for their candidate in Nov.

And again, this gets very tiresome--Obama took his own name off the Michigan ballot on his own in order to pander to the voters of Iowa and NH. He was not required to do so. His judgement(faulty) and his decision(also faulty)and now he has to live with it.

He was NOT required to remove his name from that ballot.

Florida: If he had removed his name from the Florida ballot, Florida rules would have prevented him from running in the GE. That is why he stayed on the Florida ballot--he could not play the basest of pandering politics and stay on the ballot there.

Finally, Texas is still in play.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upfront Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Don't worry about Michigan
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 03:51 PM by Upfront
The state will be very blue in the general. It is bad that we lost our primary votes but we understand who is at fault and it isn't Howard Dean. Levin was the big push on this one. If the person who has the most delegates is the candidate they will get our votes. If it isn't kiss Michigan good by, welcome President McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I live in Florida and think you are wrong
The voters here are not happy with the DNC rule. I goes directly against the charter of the party.

I think a lot will defect.

and - Obama had TV ads running in Florida - against his own stated policy.

before you flame - I am not a Hillary supporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. so you say Florida Dems prefer republicans? kinda like Rep Wasserman Schultz, right?
she's busy protecting the republican congressmen in her state,
instead of trying to get a democratic majority congress.

If Florida Dems prefer a republican, then they aren't democrats.
They are DINOS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I am saying the Dems are pissed that the nat.'l party
is ignoring their voice.

And they may stay home. . . they may cross over. They are not happy that the party has ignored their voice. You can read it in the LTTEs.

Call it what you like - the party has screwed them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. And Hillary did not win Texas
Geesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. But she got more votes there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Winning is winning the delegates
you know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Except when it comes to the Democratic Convention
There "winning" instead means getting the most pledged delegates, not the most delegates, or it must be a coup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. And we're discussing
what criteria the superdelegates should use when deciding. It's more than fair to suggest that the TX superdelegates should weigh the fact that Clinton got more votes there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
18. They'll seat MI somehow. Probably a 50-50 deal to allow them to participate in Denver.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
20. According to DNC rules, neither Florida nor Michigan count.
Hillary signed on to the disposition of both states beforehand just like all the other candidates, which renders her shit out of luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
21. Join the club. Primary voters in Washington don't count either. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC