Raven
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-23-08 05:00 PM
Original message |
What, exactly, is a Superdelegate? |
|
I think he/she may be someone elected or appointed to do something other than to take my vote away from me. Could I be wrong on that?
|
Cant trust em
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-23-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message |
1. It's a delegate with a red cape and can fly. NT |
Cali_Democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-23-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
Cant trust em
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-23-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. I was looking for that with Pelosi's face superimposed. NT |
bhikkhu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-23-08 05:06 PM
Response to Original message |
2. A delegate not tied to a state primary. |
|
Essentially an "independent" delegate who is supposed to make up his or her own mind and vote accordingly. Democratic governors, congressmen and senators, for instance, are automatically SD's.
|
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-23-08 05:08 PM
Response to Original message |
3. They are individuals whose vote in the Primary counts 100,000-1,000,000 times your |
|
measly little "people" vote.
|
SemiCharmedQuark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-23-08 05:08 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Someone whose wishes are deemed much more important than yours or mine. |
Tierra_y_Libertad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-23-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message |
5. It's the "more equal" animal. |
Asgaya Dihi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-23-08 05:16 PM
Response to Original message |
6. There's two groups of them |
|
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 05:19 PM by Asgaya Dihi
Former Presidents, sitting Governors, Senators, and others who were elected to their positions make up one group of them. The rest are filled in by party appointments, insiders for the most part. No difference between them other than how they got there though. They all have the same SD vote once in position.
Decades back we had a silly blowout at convention and got our ass handed to us for a number of reasons, one might have been bad candidate and the better part probably that we were so divided. Someone thought this method would be a way to put up a firewall if we ever seemed to be heading in the same direction. So much for good intentions I guess, they have to actually do something for it to mean anything and so far they seem willing to let it go the same way as it might have without them. The intent was clear enough, but if they actually fulfill that role is another matter.
|
Hippo_Tron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-23-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Yup, but they didn't bother to throw up a firewall and stop Mondale's nomination |
|
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 05:19 PM by Hippo_Tron
In fact some of them encouraged it, given that Mondale led in pledged delegates but didn't have a majority. Let us remember that Mondale lost just as badly as McGovern did.
|
Growler
(896 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-23-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. It'e beyond ridiculous their delay |
|
At this point I can't think of a good way to penalize any uncommitted super-delegates, but at the least they should have their SD status stripped for 2012! Waiting this long to commit is just stupid and damages the party. I don't care who they pick, just pick someone!
|
rock
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-23-08 05:42 PM
Response to Original message |
11. If a candidate wins enough "regular" delegates |
|
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 05:44 PM by rock
we can take the votes away from the super delegates.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:13 PM
Response to Original message |