Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Moving the goal post: will of the people vs will of the pledged delegates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProudToBeLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:24 AM
Original message
Moving the goal post: will of the people vs will of the pledged delegates
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 12:24 AM by ProudToBeLiberal
I have noticed that Senator Obama's supporters has been moving the goal post steadily. A couple of months ago Obama's supporters were clamoring that the superdelegates should go with the nominee who won the most votes in their respective states.

Then it changed to that the superdelegates should not overturn the "will of the people."

However, after Senator Clinton took the lead in the popular vote, Obama supporters have subtly changed their language to that Clinton should not overturn the "will of the pledged delegates.

What's going to be next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. False premise, since she never took the popular vote lead.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. She's leading by about 125k after the Pennsylvania primary
She won the Penn Primary about 215k, which helped her take the lead in the pop vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Except MI for sure will not count, and FL won't either. Sorry, she is still behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Howard Dean said that FL and MI will be seated.
Also the Secretary of States have certified the votes in the two states.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. They will be seated...once the nominee is chosen, not before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. Then you're disenfranchising million of voters...
Wow, a democratic member advocating for the purposeful disenfranchisement of millions of people. Sounds more like a Repuke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. No First....
The Florida and Michigan Legislature disenfranchized their own voters, by moving the primaries up after they were warned that their primaries would not count. They did it anyway.

Next you can blame Hillary, because she signed the agreement that they wouldn't count, and is even on video saying they wouldn't count.

Then all of a sudden, when she is losing, she starts screaming disenfranchized voters. If Obama would have "won" them, she sure as hell would not be pushing this.

Hillary is a bold faced liar.

Those states need to blame thier party leaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. Wow, your post have so many misconceptions
http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/4/23/102017/841

I can;t post the whole think because I don't have permission, but check out this post that debunks your misheld assuptions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. You haven't debunked a thing. But here's the great part - the rules don't give a fuck how you feel.
And they won't bow to idiocy like yours.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #31
40. Is this a personal attack?
Just asking because its against the rules.

oh btw, the rules don't give a fuck how you feel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #40
44. I didn't call you an idiot; I pointed out that you are demonstrating idiocy.
People can make mistakes, or they can be fuck-ups. I posted regarding the latter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. you have to admit, I turned your statement beautifully back at you
with the whole "rules don't give a fuck what you think"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #45
48. I'd admit it, if it were true. Since there was no rule violation - you still fail.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #48
49. admitting you're in denial the first step to being cured...
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 12:56 AM by ProudToBeLiberal
NT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #29
37. sorry I don't go to the spun lies of mydd considering their lies about Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #21
30. Learn some remedial government. It's not disenfranchisement.
Don't like it? Take it to court to overturn the legal precedent that established that you don't have a RIGHT to vote in a PRIMARY.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. they won't be rewarded for breaking the rules.
They will be seated but penalized heavily, and it will not affect the outcome.

48 other states followed the rules, they are not going to reward two for breaking them, sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #12
28. He did indeed - IN A MANNER THAT BOTH CAMPAIGNS AGREE ON.
You desperate clintrolls keep forgetting that VERY RELEVANT FACT.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #28
36. Let me help you clear up your misconceptions
10) All the candidates signed a pledge to the DNC not to campaign in the states violating primary timing.


FALSE: The candidates signed no such pledge to the DNC.

11) Hillary violated the rules against campaigning in Florida and Michigan.


FALSE: Jurisdiction over determinations of whether a candidate shall be considered in violation of the relevant rule (Rule 20 C.1.b.) lies with the Rules and Bylaws Committee. Because the Committee has not ruled against either candidate, it is false to assert that either candidate is in violation.

12) Hillary signed a pledge that she violated by remaining on the ballot in Florida and Michigan?


FALSE: The only pledges signed were between the candidates and the state party chairs in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Nevada. More to the point, they were not binding on the DNC, which is the only organization that has authority over seating delegates. Thus, these pledges are not controlling over the seating of Florida and Michigan delegates.

http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/4/23/102017/841
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #36
41. Once again, the truth doesn't care about your lies. Obama will win.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinbgoode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. The uncommitteds kicked her butt in Michigan anyway.
It's pretty bad to be the only candidate on a ballot and you can't get a majority of the votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. It was 55% Clinton and 40% Uncommited in Michigan
How is that not the majority?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. fuzzy math?
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 12:30 AM by SunsetDreams
How does 215,000 subtracted from 700,000 something equal her taking the lead in pop vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. Where are you getting your fuzzy math?
Sen. Obama took his name off the Michigan ballot, so he got no votes there. But Sen. Clinton remained on the ballot, and the New York senator picked up 329,000 votes. Both candidates were on the ballot in Florida, which Sen. Clinton won by about 300,000 votes. If those two states' disputed votes are counted, Sen. Clinton would lead in the popular vote by 123,000.

The RealClearPolitics estimate also doesn't include the results of four caucus states that didn't release numbers. The Web site calculates that Sen. Obama would net 110,000 votes if its estimate of those vote totals were included. That would still leave him behind by 13,000 votes, or 0.04%, of the 30.7 million

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120900311206240473.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. right back at ya....I guess you haven't listened to the pundits and
strategists spell it out today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. link? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #24
34. Here's one:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #34
42. Sorry, I don't click links from monikors that have "Sunset" in it. n/t
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 12:57 AM by ProudToBeLiberal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. No, she's not. Go read the "MATH" thread and get back to us.
You're WRONG.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Total, complete hogwash.
Read much? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinbgoode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Nice try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
33. Please explain, exactly how she is leading in the popular vote.
And do it ONLY with states where valid elections were held.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. She has not taken the lead in anything
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 12:27 AM by SunsetDreams
His lead in popular vote is still something like 483,000

It's Sen. Clinton that keeps moving the goal posts.

She spun this into a double digit lead, it was 9.2% not 10%

She spun the lie about over taking the lead in popular vote, because she is hurting for money. Obama made her spend heavily. Plus she is 10,000,000 in debt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. She hasn't taken the popular vote lead, sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. Where did you get the idea she has the
lead in popular vote? If it's counting MI and FL which she honestly didn't win and can't win now cause they've been taken off the shelf, I think you'd better subtract them from her total. Obama is ahead in the popular vote and has been for a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. From Hillary herself, that's what she's been lying about today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
11. Specious Posit. Shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
17. Its always been about pledged delegates
Always will be unless there is a tie. Which isn't happening.

Thanks for playing.

And by playing I mean making a bunch of shit up with no basis in reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scooter24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
19. She has never had the lead in any race this contest...
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 12:39 AM by Scooter24
Obama has the most pledged delegates...

Obama has raised the most money...

Obama has the most popular votes...

Obama has won the most states (by a 2-1 margin- 30 of 45)

The goalpost has always stayed the same. Party tradition has always been the winner of most votes in the primary should recieve the Super Delegate vote. That has been the standard for this whole primary season.

Now about Clinton, she never took the lead in the popular vote. Naturally, she is including Michigan (of which Obama wasn't even on the ballot) and Florida (where he didn't campaign) whose votes of course went overwhelmingly to her. Since the states were never in play and because she needs the numbers to influence SD's, she is all of a suddent counting these votes as part of her tally. Not very honest in my opinon but at least the SD's are still coming into Obama's court. She is desperate right now, for money and for votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
22. Clinton is not in the lead in the popular votes...MI and FL don't count...
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 12:38 AM by Triana
...MI will likely never count because Obama wasn't even on the ballot there. HE knows how to follow the rules.

Find something better to smoke, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. So, do you have the guts to back up your words?
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 12:44 AM by ProudToBeLiberal
Go to a florida and michigan and tell them "your fucking votes don't count." Go to Martin Luther Kings Jr.'s grave and tell him that millions of votes casted in FL and Mi don't count.

Your post sounds like the typical internet bully. He/she talks the talks, but when it comes down to it they hide behind their computer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #26
35. uh...what the fuck? Are you taking your meds?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PermanentRevolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #26
39. I'm from Florida.
Florida and Michigan's votes don't count. A fact which every single one of us knew before we voted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #26
46. Wow, you're off the reservation. I've never seen a clintroll insult King as you just did.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #46
50. If you stop insulting me, maybe we can be friends :)
NT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #26
47. Why don't YOU go to Dr. King's grave, and you can tell him how proud you are of PA
Where 1 out of 5 Hillary voters said they would NEVER vote for a Black man. I'm sure he would love to hear that.

If the voters of Michigan and Florida want to be pissed at someone for their non-elections, they should try the DLC scumbags in those state's parties who deliberately tried to front load those states, so they could be a part of the expected Hillary coronation.

Which ended up being cancelled anyway, thank God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
27. When I see a Hill supporter ...
... accusing anyone else on the entire planet of moving goalposts, I have to acknowledge that the bottom of the barrel has now officially been scraped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwenu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
32. Lies. Obama supporters did NOT come up with that. The media DID!!!! Try again, please.
There is no versus for Obama it is one and the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
38. THE TRUTH, TO COUNTER THE LIES (OR SELF-DELUSION) OF THE OP:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5639954

...WHICH DEMONSTRATES THAT EVEN IF FL AND MI ARE SEATED, SHE'S STILL BEHIND EVEN IN THE IRRELEVANT POPULAR VOTE METRIC.

You fail, OP. Suck on the truth!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #38
43. yeah frankly I'm done with this OP, we've given links and
debunks and still they spin....so I will not be coming back to this post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #43
51. How's the horseback riding and croquette at your estate? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC