Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In your opinion, why are the right-wing media supporting Senator Hillary Clinton?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:34 AM
Original message
Poll question: In your opinion, why are the right-wing media supporting Senator Hillary Clinton?
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 05:37 AM by Syrinx
I've just watched a bit of Scarborough, and a little of "Fox And Friends."

I have lost count of the little ways with which they are promoting Clinton over Obama. It is maddening.

Fox is even saying that the North Carolina ad featuring Jeremiah Wright is being sponsored by the same statewide Democratic candidates that support Obama for president. :crazy:

And Scarborough, bless his heart, is spinning desperately for Clinton, with a helpful assist from Andrea Mitchell.

Willie Geist, it seems, is dazed and confused, while occasionally trying to get a little truth injected into the discussion.

Beyond the on-air "talent," for lack of a better word, Clinton has been embraced and endorsed by the likes of Rupert Murdoch and Richard Mellon-Scaife, the person that has, in the past, accused her and her husband of murder.

Why do you think that the nefarious, right-wing puppeteers are pushing so hard for Hillary Clinton?

Is it because they feel confident they can beat her in November? Or is it because she is on their team?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PetraPooh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Please give me the option of "all of the above"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. okay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. I didn't see the program you just watched. But the only media -- corporate or otherwise --
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 05:41 AM by bluetrain
that I've come across in the last six months has been almost laughably bashing Clinton and promoting Obama. I have not seen anyone take her side except for independent bloggers or anonymous posters on message boards or people I know personally.

Anne Coulter doesn't count because she's a performance artist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. You are the same poster providing us with Rove's plan on Obama......
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 05:41 AM by FrenchieCat
and saying that we should be worried and that you are concerned....yet you can not see the media bias in favor of Hillary?

That's rich!

That let's me know where you are really coming from.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. I'm as left as you get. Take my word for it or not. I've been a member here since 04.
You can probably dig up the posts where I spoke to a whistle blower in FL about the fraud back then.

I do not see a Clinton bias in the slightest. In fact, I see exactly the opposite.

Doubt me all you like. I know where I stand. And it's much to the left of either Clinton or Obama. There are even issues which I feel Kucinich is too centrist on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. They do, non stop, be glad you havent seen it.
Hillary herself has made countless appearances on Fox news, as well as her surrogates. They appear to like them better than, the other media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:56 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. The last piece of Corporate TV I watched was the PA debate on YouTube many days after the fact.
You have to understand that, at this point, my only goal is to not have McCain in the White House. Previous to that, I caught about fifteen minutes of Gwen Ivans on PBS back in February. The entire panel was repeating the same talking points while acting like they were having independent ideas. It was laughable. And frightening. Robots. It was all anti-Clinton. All biased. And I asked the people I was watching it with whether it was always this biased. They looked at me befuddled. This is a regular show they watch. I further explained, well, we just saw 6 (-?) people say the exact same thing, oftentimes not even bothering to paraphrase each other, does that seem strange to you at all? They're so fucking intellectually lazy they hadn't noticed and, at this point, couldn't even begin to start thinking for themselves.

Really. Turn it all off. Listen to the stump speeches. Take Murdoch debates with a pile of salt. Look at their records. The specifics of their proposed plans. But these talking heads are fucking toxic to democracy -- as is an electorate too exhausted to employ independent thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
30. Rove explained back in 2007 to Repugs
that they were not to go after Hillary because that would "unite the party" behind her. Well, the MSM has pushed this issue of Hillary getting out, etc, etc, which has only caused the public, especially women, to rally behind her. The Repugs won't be seen as doing this, per se, but the MSM will do it for them. This whole "bashing" is meant to HELP HER, while at the same time, harm Obama because he is perceived to be getting some kind of "free ride" (undeserving black man taking from white woman what is owed her due to "extreme liberalism") and also portrayed as being the one that is calling for Hillary's exit.

It works to their bigger plan. Which is really just scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think it's pretty obvious to anyone who's an objective and rational observer.
They think she'll be far easier to beat. John McCain is perceived (wrongly, in my opinion) as something of a maverick within the Republican Party, and to have moderate tendencies that the hardcore conservative GOP base distrust. Therefore, a lot of the GOP base may be disinclined to vote for him in November, instead opting to sit out the election. Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, is positively loathed by a significant percentage of that same GOP base, who will be more motivated by their hatred to vote AGAINST her than they will be to vote FOR McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. Like you?
Please, she's a moderate Democrat fighting against the combined powers of Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, and Barack Hussein Obama. Who the fuck do you think they're gonna want to see win this thing? Which Republican would you rather lose to, Paul Wolfowitz or Lincoln Chafee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's not the Dem candidates supporting Obama, while I'm not
denying there could be some from the Opponent. This is mainly the RNC if not entirely the RNC.

Fox is the worst pukefest of a network. They can kiss my Dem behind, and stick it where the sun don't shine!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDudeAbides Donating Member (240 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Follow the money
George Soros (Obama's puppeteer) controls all MSM except Fox. Clintons have money ties with Fox.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. no I'm not buying that junk Not this time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDudeAbides Donating Member (240 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
31. Time will tell
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 06:51 AM by TheDudeAbides
obviously, the MSM isn't acting normal. There are indeed money ties between Soros and MSM...and he has a strong history of manipulating MSM in other countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
6. They want Obama bloodied up,they helped her in Tx with over 100k votes
Richard Mellon Scaife has endorsed her because the right doesn't have to fear a Clinton administration. Keep in mind they already know she has lost,that was pointed out on Fox Sunday show with Bill Kristol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
10. They want her so they can beat her.
But if she wins they think she's more likely to play ball. And these stupid "news" channels only exist for ad money. So, all three.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. I think that's about right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
14. Compared to past elections, both candidates are raking in some remarkable
amounts of money and much of it is spent on advertising. The media is willing to encourage this contest in any way they can to keep the big bucks flowing their way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
15.  Which Republican would you rather lose to, Paul Wolfowitz or Lincoln Chafee?
She's the obvious lesser of two evils in any serious Republican's mind. Barack Obama has the support of Ted Kennedy and John Kerry behind him and is widely regarded as being much more liberal than Hillary who is generally regarded as a moderate Democrat. If they have to lose to one or the other, they would much rather lose to Hillary than Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chapel hill dem Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
16. They want her because if Obama is denied the nomination, then they assume
the new young voters he has brought into the party will lose interest and not vote in the GE. These new folks use cell phones exclusively and are hard to poll. The theory must be to make them say "whatever...outta here" and they lose interest politics for a long time, thus insuring a GOP dynasty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
19. Just think of the bags of trash she has in the back room.
I am sure the ads are being made up now. And I am sure Bill will be the co-president. Just how the hell is she going to keep him out of it? After all she rode in on his coat tails. He will claim his pound. Funny it is one person she does not say she is part of. We have watched this women ride the coat tails of this man right up the power halls in DC and I am sure she will have to let him into the Office for pay back. He was a pretty good President only I hated this NAFTA stuff and 'fast track' stuff but 8 years in long enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeeDeeNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
20. If the right-wing media are in favor of something, whatever it is,
then it's most likely something to be totally against, as far as I'm concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
22. Only because she would be easier to beat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
23. I heard early on
that the republicans were afraid of Obama's following--in their eyes, that is the worst case scenario--a democratic nominee with a large and active public following. A following that will make a big deal out of a stolen election this time around. a following that is likely to take to the street when they screw with their votes. And a following that won't sit still while they swiftboat our candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
24. Actually, with Obama not being able to carry blue collar voters...
...in the industrial Midwest, Repubs are quickly changing their minds of who they would rather face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
25. None of the above. They're trying to stretch it out...
... but not because of $$$. They think the longer she beats up on Obama the easier he will be to defeat in Nov.

Limbaugh and others have said as much.

They want to drrraaaggg it out as long as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
26. a,b,e
(e) radical-RW is happy to interfere with the opposing team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
27. Hillary Clinton is on their team
and Rove is working for her. Connect the Dots.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
28. She's the rethugs "stalking horse."
And, of course, Hillary is happy to play that role.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
29. The media I hear promotes Obama, not Clinton.
Now I admit, I don't listen to Scarborough and Fox but I have heard the networks basically give Obama free ads in the middle of their "news".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC