Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Richard Mellon Scaife endorsed Clinton. And she accepted it.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:30 PM
Original message
Richard Mellon Scaife endorsed Clinton. And she accepted it.
I don't want to hear a damn word from any supporter of hers, ever, about any association of Obama's.

Ever.

Bring up Rev. Wright? I'll respond with Richard Mellon Scaife.

Rezko? Scaife.

Farrakhan? Scaife.

etc.

I spent most of the 90s defending the Clintons until I was blue in the face, only to have those assholes turn around and suck up to the very man who was the reason I had to do it! That is bullshit.

There are some lines you do not cross and they crossed this one. And in case you Clinton supporters still don't get it, this photograph should provide you with a good analogy:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. I guess he forgave her murder of Vince Foster. That was big-hearted of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Hillary believes in redemption, dontcha know. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, if BHO makes it to the general, you're gonna hear about his associates early and often.
Get used to the idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. And of course, a Hillbot shrugs off HER associations.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Wow, can't please some people. I put your hero in the general race.
And STILL...they WHINE.

Here, have a drink, calm yourself down:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Um no... you said "if".....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. So? I used the conditional. I still put him in the race in my scenario.
Whine away, though. No pleasing some people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. If the Obama campaign is brought to you by Starbucks, har har yuk yuk, the Clinton campaign must be
brought to you by these folks:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. Yep--because Clinton knows how to dispense with the shit, bull or otherwise,
and clear out the crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
49. I think a Thorazine cocktail would be more appropriate for this one. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 06:16 AM
Response to Reply #49
68. Oh, how CLEVER of you, to suggest a medication indicated for mental illness!
Quite the WAG, aren't we?

Apparently, you're FAMILIAR with it, it tripped so easily off your tongue!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScarletSniper Donating Member (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
55. Bitter as usual. Must suck bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #55
67. So sorry that you are bitter as usual.
I'm pleased as punch, though--your assessment, like so many other of your comments, is in error.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Hillary has no baggage, no skeletons, no weak spots, no chink in the armor.
She's so fucking inevitable, omnipotent and indestructible, that she's losing to a guy that no one ever heard of three years ago. She's sure to whip the GOP like a rented mule, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
34. Mother Theresa had baggage....any and every politician has baggage.
Why do you present a false construct in your subject line? Does it make you feel good to make that fake assertion so that you can knock it down in self-satisfied fashion? And such TEMPER!! FUCKING inevitable, eh? Why....GRRRRRR! :eyes:

I think she's the stronger candidate of the two. She has more staying power, more gravitas, and she is certainly less tempermental than either her opponent or his supporters. And if you want to talk about her baggage, her baggage stinks less than Obama's, because the US government spent tens of millions of dollars going through it and coming up with jack. Unlike Obama's, which is fresher, un-discussed, unvetted...and there's LOTS there that hasn't hit the mainstream yet.

Obviously, you have a different view than I do. Tell ya what--you enjoy your view, and I'll enjoy mine.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. You are the first person who's ever said they believe Hillary is
"less temperamental" than Obama. The woman who weeps for the cameras for sympathy, and says how PROUD she is of Obama and then the next day screeches "SHAME ON YOUU!!", and laughs inappropriately like a psycho at tough questions, and makes up stories and then lies about lying, and makes pre-planned jokes that someone crafted for her despite the mood of the audience or the setting--this is "less temperamental" than Obama, who is one of the most cool, calm, rational guys I've ever seen in politics? She's not emotionally stable, frankly. And the fact that she's losing the overall race means, inescapably, that she's the WEAKER candidate. The leader is BY DEFINITION the stronger candidate. But, hey, enjoy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. You know, just because you "characterize" a person's behavior does not make what you say "true."
And just because you assert opinions as if they're facts, that doesn't make your opinions valid to anyone save yourself.

If you're trying to change my mind with your rhetoric, it's not working. I am uninterested in swaying you, I don't feel the "need" to hector or browbeat. It never works, anyway.

But hey, enjoy, indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAbuchan08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #42
71.  just because "characterize" a person's behavior does not make what you say "true."
Edited on Fri Apr-25-08 10:58 AM by Gonnabuymeagun
I agree completely, which is why you are wrong.

BTW I don't think "characterize" belongs in quotes in the context you are using it. It actually negates the tone I think you are trying for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #34
70. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #70
72. Ah, the sexist (and sexual) language rears its ugly head. Didn't take long.
Do you really think you're amusing with that "rhetorical gang-bang" reference? Apparently so, since you took the trouble to write that, and to trot out the little rolling "ha ha ha" man.

Perhaps you simply don't realize that you sound like an unmitigated ass. My, I thought the insecure, crotch clutching "sexist pigs" from the old days had all wised up or gone over to the GOP--I see I'm mistaken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. I don't know what Ignored is whining about but I do know the answer.
Richard Mellon Scaife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. So now, he's an "associate"?
Good grief. The guy accused her of murdering Vince Foster.

This is the sort of shit that makes me think the Clintons I used to admire have been taken over by fucking POD PEOPLE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
73. And what did Fox News accuse Obama of? Being a closet Muslim, associating with
terrorists, being up to his ass in crooked Chicago-Rezko politics, and wiping his ass on the flag.

SAY.....Be sure to tune in to Fox News Sunday this weekend and watch Obama on Chris Wallace's show, now....

How's THAT "sort of shit" working for you? Is Obama, who froze out Fox and said he wouldn't appear on them, a POD person because he backed off that pledge and not only went on Hannity when he had the Wright troubles, but he's now going on Wallace's show?

You can't smell a little whiff of double-standard in the air?

It's not ABOUT the tools who own the media outlets. You apparently don't see that.

It's about the voters those outlets reach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
64. Don't count on it. I've studied Scaife for years...
...and he is not stupid.

He loathes the Clintons. He especially was disgusted by Bill Clinton and his DickGates in the White House. I never could figure out why he hated Hillary so much. Looking back, maybe he saw the same things in Hillary Clinton that I am finally seeing now that have made me work so actively to keep her out of the Oval Office.

So far I've seen two of the Scaife toadies as talking heads, after Scaife endorsed Hillary:

Tony Snow was against Obama.
Some bimbo from teh Independent Women's Forum (that's the group that Scaife money started, and sent the bevy of bimbos (Ann Coulter, Laura Ingraham, etc.) around to the news shows during Bill's DickGates. This current bimbo seemed to be pro Obama.

One of Scaife's most loyal toadies, which was started by Scaife dough and has been funded by Scaife since that time, is Judicial Watch (Larry Klayman) who has been after the Clintons recently to get them to release information.

So, depend on Scaife to support the Clintons. He certainly isn't funding them enough to keep them afloat financially in the primary. Hell, he gave Judicial Watch $10million the first year they were in existence, and that was chump change to Scaife. He could, through the Scaife foundations, funnel more money to her, if he was so inclined.

I would not be surprised if Scaife pulls the ultimate coups against the Clintons and turns and guts them he can do the most harm. He carries grudges and he, like most skunks, does not change his stripes overnight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hillary should have "rejected and denounced" Scaife's endorsement.......
...instead, she accepted it.


She accepted an endorsement from the very man that caused all the problems in the 90s.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. It's really that simple. There's no justification. None. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Ex-Gay Miss Donnie trotted out to save the evil fags!
WOW! Both of our candidates are NOT perfect! What shocker!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Richard. Mellon. Scaife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #18
33. Jesus can even save YOU from your evil ways.
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 01:12 PM by ronnykmarshall
Just like Miss Donnie said at an Obama event!

PRAISE! GLORY!



I think Donnie's just FAB-U-LOS! Oh, but in a heterosexual way! - Alan "Deep Dark" Chambers (Ex-Gay)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Richard.















Mellon.



















Scaife.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Bette.
Midler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Celine.
Dion.

And that's not a compliment, BTW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. Joan.
Crawford.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Faye.
Dunaway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #45
50. Doris.
Day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. Judy.
Garland.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. Elizabeth.
Taylor.
Hilton.
Wilding.
Todd.
Fisher.
Burton.
Burton.
Warner.
Fortenski.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. rofl. Okay you win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #53
56. I knew that would do it!
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 02:17 PM by ronnykmarshall
Thanks, that was good!

Where's my pants?

Call me?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #52
60. your good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
navarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. to the greatest with you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. Right. He's a "Gentleman", but Bill Richardson, Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, Keith Olbermann,
Michael Moore, etc. are scum.

strange times, strange times.

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Don't forget that AWFUL David Schuster, the one who accused her of murder...
oh wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. The answer to whatever Ignored is spewing is Richard Mellon Scaife, nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. You may have me on "ignore", but I'm actually agreeing with you.
Hence, the perils of the ignore feature, which is why I don't use it.

Tempting as it is, around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
54. If you consider the source..it's not "strange"
at all..it's par for the bilge water course hilary has carved out for her white house return. We'll see if she guzzled too much of her own bilge water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
19. Think about this: A man accuses you of murder. You then seek out and accept his endorsement????
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Mind-boggling, but very indicative of just what sort of person Hillary is.
No integrity, no honor, no scruples, no standards--just a mad lust for power, and a willingness to embrace whatever gets her there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Desperate times call for desperate measures I guess. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. I hadn't heard that she sought his endorsement
Do you have a link for that? thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. When you meet with a paper's editorial board, you are seeking their endorsement.
Such meetings are completely voluntary.

Here's the link: http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/s_559659.html

Pay particular attention to this quote by Clinton: "It was so counterintuitive, I just thought it would be fun to do."

She just thought it would be such a hoot! Apparently, she charmed the neocon whackjobs who comprise the Pitt Trib's editorial board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
61. politics have strange bed fellows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
23. Never pick a fight with a man who buys ink by the barrel
That's a quote that's been attributed to everyone from Mark Twain to Bill Clinton, but it's dead-on accurate.

As much as I despise Scaife and cringed to see Hillary sucking up to him, she would have gone down in flames in PA if she hadn't done what she did AND accepted his endorsement.

You just can't take a powerful media owner and publicly kick him in the nuts. That's a political fact of life -- unsavory, but true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Who said she had to kick him in the nuts?
All she had to do was NOT seek out and accept his endorsement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScarletSniper Donating Member (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #25
57. Don't mention "nuts" Billy boy might show up...lmao
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 02:20 PM by ScarletSniper
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. So out of "political expediency", she cozies up to a guy who accused her of killing her friend?
Sort of like how, out of "political expediency", she voted for the Iraq War?

See, this is why I'm not supporting her. Some things matter more than political expediency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. It's more than expediency
Although that's part it of it. If Scaife signals that he wants to meet with you, you have to do it. Period.

Remember when Obama didn't meet with the editor of the gay paper who asked him for an interview? Segments of the gay community went ballistic and were calling for gays to abandon Obama because he dissed them.

Scaife is much more powerful than the tiny gay paper in Philly. Like him or not, you have to deal with him.

I'm not a Hillary supporter, but I know where this is coming from. I was a journalist for many years and even people we opposed and beat on had to make the pilgrimage to see us when they were running. They couldn't afford not to.

If you were running, you would be free to choose political suicide in order to maintain your high principles, and I would too. I would kick Scaife in the nuts if I had the opportunity. But that's why I'm not running for president and never would. That and the fact I refuse to decorate myself with flags and pretend I'm a Christian.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. Bullshit. She didn't have to meet with them.
Had she turned the meeting down, everyone would have understood why and she would have gained respect for it.

Obama didn't meet with them.

The endorsement itself is unbelievably patronizing and insulting too. http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/s_559659.html

This is a politician selling out to an extent that rivals McCain embracing Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #38
46. She could have refused -- and it would have meant a 10 point loss in PA
That's a fact -- no matter how many times you yell "bullshit."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. That's not a fact. That is speculation on your part. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #47
59. Yes -- but well-informed speculation -- the best kind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #59
62. Informed by your own hubris.
You're not the first journo I've met who had an overblown sense of his own importance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheap_Trick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
31. she's desperate enough to take whatever support is thrown her way
clinging to it like a life preserver in the ocean....too bad the right would throw her an anchor in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
40. If she ever became the nominee, that endorsement would be the biggest blunder of her career.
What the hell was she thinking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Did you get a load of the endorsement itself?
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 01:25 PM by thecatburgler
It's the most patronizing and insulting thing I've ever read! It's like "Aww, look how cute she is! She does parlor tricks and everything!"

Edit to add link: http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/s_559659.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
41. The SAY ANYTHING DO ANYTHING Mrs. Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
48. The Clinton Machine is running solely on Republican fuel at this point. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
58. K&R. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
63. a reproach with a longtime enemy vs. a relationship with a longtime pastor?
no comparison
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #63
66. Yes, seeking out Scaife's endorsement is much worse.
Hillary had no emotional attachment to Scaife. She slapped people like me, who defended her and her husband against Scaife's attacks for years, in the face for cynical political gain. She sat there on Keith Olbermann, laughing as he told her he quit his job at Fox because of what Scaife was doing, and then piously claimed that she believed in "redemption". Richard Mellon Scaife has redeemed himself, exactly how? Has he moderated his reactionary worldview? Not that I can tell. He still espouses the most regressive social and economic policies. So why would Hillary suddenly warm up to someone like him? Oh yeah, because he's helping her beat Barack.

As for Wright, I can never figure out from you Hillbots what your beef is. Are you genuinely upset by what he said? Does God Damn America really have you reaching for the smelling salts? Or do you see Wright as an opportunity to exploit racial divisions in America and derail Obama's campaign? It's hard to tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
65. She is the real Unity candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
69. Better to have him inside the tent pissing out than outside the tent pissing in.
Edited on Fri Apr-25-08 06:26 AM by Perry Logan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zam Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
74. Mrs. Clinton knows the right wing wants her to win the primaries so they can beat her in the GE.
And she is using that to her advantage and it is very smart of her to do so.

She thinks "who cares they think I am the weaker candidate. Once I am the nominee I will show them who has the last laugh."

You can question the ethics of such a frame of mind, but ethics have never won anyone an election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
75. HRC is disgusting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC