Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gov. Kulongoski is First Signer Of Online Petition Urging Sen. Obama to Debate In Oregon

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:18 PM
Original message
Gov. Kulongoski is First Signer Of Online Petition Urging Sen. Obama to Debate In Oregon
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 01:34 PM by rodeodance
What say Obama??


*****PASS THIS AROUND TO ALL YOU KNOW*****SPREAD THE WORD FAR AND WIDE***



4/23/2008
Oregon for Hillary Launches www.DebateOregon.com
Gov. Kulongoski is First Signer Of Online Petition Urging Sen. Obama to Debate In Oregon

Oregon for Hillary today launched an online petition at www.debateoregon.com., urging Sen. Obama to participate in two Oregon debates proposed by Hillary Clinton. Supporters can also text "DEBATE" to "442008" to sign the petition on their cell phone.

"Hillary Clinton is committed to listening to Oregonians, and with the launch of her new Oregon Compact policy plan, she is pledging to work closely with our state," said Oregon for Hillary Communications Director and Oregon native, Julie Edwards. "Oregon voters should have the same chance to hear from the candidates as the voters of Iowa, South Carolina and New Hampshire - all of which hosted debates. We encourage everyone to go to www.debateoregon.com. to send the clear message that Oregon issues deserve to be heard."

Oregon Governor Ted Kulongoski became the first to sign the petition and announced a multi-city trip tomorrow to discuss Hillary’s Oregon Compact and advocate for a candidates’ debate.

Earlier today, Clinton challenged Sen. Obama to participate in two Oregon debates:

"Since the Pacific Northwest hasn't had a single presidential debate, I am proposing today that Oregon host two Democratic debates, including one specific debate on the challenges facing rural Oregonians. I encourage Oregonians to pay attention in the weeks ahead; to see how Senator Obama and I address the issues that people in Oregon care about. Debates about real issues -- Oregon issues -- are good for the state and healthy for our democracy."

To see the entire statement, please visit www.debateoregon.com.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is Kulongoski a Clinton endorser?
Or is he still neutral? Just curious...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Oh he is a Clinton supporter alright. As an Oregonian, I say no more debates.
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 01:21 PM by GarbagemanLB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Great--thanks. Nice to know that Hillary has the Gov. on her side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Audio_Al Donating Member (536 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
87. Thanks for posting this information.
Respectfully,

Call me Al

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #87
91. Thanks Al
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
102. You mean, she has the Governor licking her boot like Ed Rendell the Clinton Poodle did. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #102
105. another IMMATURE comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. sorry, i do not know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
here_is_to_hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. He came out for Hillary...
And we tossed his mediocre ass under the bus....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. oh gosh, so many people under that bus





.........And we tossed his mediocre ass under the bus....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I can only describe his introduction of her
at her rally in Portland a few weeks ago as obsequious and pandering. It was embarrassing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I take it you will not sign the petition??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. No. HELL NO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. ah. ok--please pass to your friends. Maybe they have open minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. I'm sure they would say
that if they only have one life to live they don't want to spend it watching a 22nd debate for the sole purpose of providing free air-time to a losing candidate who has shot her wad.

Just my opinion, though. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. so let them decide for themselves. What are you afraid of?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #32
103. My friends are too busy signing petitions to the DNC for censure of Hillary....
...for her Bush/Rove tactics and her boot-licking to the Republican Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
rsmith6621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why Should Obama Have To Debate More Lies


......from Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. If Hillary agrees to field some questions about Vince Foster, I'll support a debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. Why not this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lannigan Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
84. Vince Foster: smear story started & spread by the RW - NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
90. You are not differnent that RW --as they are ones who did that smear and you parrot them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. 21 debates not enough for Hillary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goletian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
67. yeah, why cant she close the deal?
why so much pressure on obama comin from the clinton camp thats calling him weak? sounds like someones desperate for free exposure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #67
106. Too bad its Obama who is being asked that question --Outspending her 3:1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goletian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #106
119. being able to outspend her 3 to 1. hillary would pay too if she had the dough. - nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #119
145. He could not buy the votes in PA--even though he tried. Hillary won em over with her great policies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goletian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #145
149. he didnt try to buy votes. the obama camp wasnt expecting a victory there.
stop deluding yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #149
150. he sure wasted a lot of $$ trying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goletian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #150
151. no he didnt. narrowing the gap was exactly what they sought to accomplish, and they did it. - nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #151
163. ha ha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goletian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #163
167. thats exactly what i said when i saw a 20+ point projection reduced to a 9 point reality. well put.
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 06:46 PM by goletian
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
152. It's only twenty-one? My god.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. What has to be said that hasn't been said
in the last 20-something debates? No more free air time for Hillary...pound sand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. TWO more debates? Like the other 20+ weren't enough.
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 01:31 PM by Qutzupalotl
One would be reasonable, and probably is what they'll wind up doing. But I suspect Clinton asked for two so that when they settle on one, she can still say he's afraid to debate her...20+ previous debates notwithstanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ps1074 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. It will be over by then
Hillary will concede or be forced to concede after she loses IN and NC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. How many months have you been saying this??? She is stronger than ever and you
still are making silly predictions~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
16. did you miss something in the previous 235151341 debates?????
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Yes. I have yet to see Obama give an eloquent answer to a question he was not prepared for.
That is kind-of important, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
33. I thought he nailed it in regards to Ayers
In reference to knowing a Republican Senator who said we should blow up abortion clinics.

I guess Obama wants to blow up abortion clinics too???

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Did Tom Colburn throw Obama a fundraiser?
If no, then your comparison is invalid.

If yes, par for the course!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #19
37. Oh I'd love a debate where Hillary
would have to answer about the weatherman pardons and her not knowing about them or Bill's and Penns ties to Columbia. also her long support for Nafta, Or how about how she was fatigued on her bosnia answer but her one of her numerous answers came during the day, I'd like to know how can we trust you at 3:00 am if you get fatigued so easy, maybe we could get her to answer about her relationship with the "family" or hillary why don't you wear a flag pin? Or on her nuke Iran or making fun of NZ prime minister. I'm sure you want those answered?
yeah right, If questions like that were posed to your "girl" you would be crying that's not right, they are sexist questions,right? you are nothing but a hypocrite and you know it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. So bitter. So, so bitter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. thats all you got, you are too easy
empty pantsuit just like your candidate:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. I am not sure how you were expecting me to respond to your ranting.
Did you want one of these: :thumbsup:?

One of these: :applause:?

One of these: :woohoo:?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. why didn't you respond to the first one?
you know why, because you don't have substance just snarky replies.
hence the empty suit reference

but feel free to give me any of those smilies, I sure would appreciate it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. I did. Succinctly and to the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. I get it, only Obama can be asked tough questions
That really have nothing to do with anything. But we cant ask Hillary perfectly legit policy questions such as NAFTA.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. She has been asked plenty of tough questions.
Most of the time she answered them perfectly...

But a few times she was less than eloquent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #48
54. Like her illegal drivers license flap
where in the follwing debate she flipped her answer and she was not asked a follow up question. and Obama supporters get accused as the kool-aid crowd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. Ummm. Kool-Aid?
I admitted that she has made some mistakes and missteps at debates. Especially when asked difficult grey-area questions.

How is that make me part of the Kool-Aid crowd?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #56
61. you saying Obama has yet to give an eloquent answer
that he was not prepared for? you don't think that response comes right out of the Kool Aid stereotype. He has giving plenty of eloquent answer in the debate. For one I love his answer on licenses for illegal immigrants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #48
59. like why did they turn to Reverend Wright when they had marriage problems?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #59
64. Like I have said.
Bill was very busy. He was not in church that day. He hadn't yet heard Rev. Wright's comments regarding 9/11 when he invited him to the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #64
72. also like when Bill praised farrakhan and her buddy rendell
But hey, if double-standards and duplicity were not a part of Hillary Clinton’s campaign character she’d have to disassociate herself from her husband.

Yes, former President Bill said kind words about Farrakhan in a May 2005 New York Amsterdam News interview about the Million More March planned for later that year.

That Clinton called that March “a very positive idea” complimenting Farrakhan, Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton for working together on the March

snip

Dramatic evidence of Clinton’s duplicity bannering this non-endorsement by Farrakhan burst into campaign discourse the day before the Pa primary with the posting of a video on You Tube by a Philadelphian showing Clinton’s chief Pennsylvania surrogate lavishly praising Farrakhan over a decade ago.

This video that received over 33,000 views within its first twenty-four hours on that popular internet site shows Clinton booster Pa Governor Ed Rendell praising Farrakhan in April 1997.

Philadelphia freelance journalist and Nation of Islam member Jehron Hunter posted this reality check video now producing lively discussion from the web-based Slate Magazine to right-wing FOX NEWS channel.

Yes, then Philadelphia Mayor Ed Rendell eagerly applauded the work of Farrakhan during a 1997 rally at the historic Tindley Temple Church on Broad south of South Street

Yes, then Mayor and now Obama-basher Rendell embraced inviting Farrakhan to the City of Brotherly Love to help dissipate race-based disturbances in the Grey’s Ferry section of Philly.

And yes, Rendell’s remarks at that 1997 rally included commending the Nation of Islam’s “emphasis on family values and self-sufficiency.”

http://counterpunch.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #72
78. Wow, what a world.
Clinton complements someone

Rendell complements someone

They must agree on every issue then. They might have even gone to Libya together (when Libya was still on the OFAC list...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #78
108. you are a dishonest character aren't you
because you agree with the hypocrisy of Hillary when she brings up farrakhan to attack Obama, scare the white voters
but when it is pointed out that her Husband, whose record she is running on, compliments Farrakhan you ignore it Then the evidence of her bud rendell with the love fest he showed for that black muslim that is also ignored

why can't I play your game, wright said something I don't like Obama must believe the same thing

now if that is not dishonesty then tell me what is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #108
116. I never made any such comments about Obama.
Check my posting history. I am not a bot and I do not attack unprovoked.

Dishonesty really seems to be your department.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #116
121. This is from you
"Bill was very busy. He was not in church that day. He hadn't yet heard Rev. Wright's comments regarding 9/11 when he invited him to the White House"

I can infer
ding ding we have a liar (or is misspoke better for you) here folks at Du
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #121
122. Infer what?
I was responding to a question. "Why did they turn to Rev. Wright..."

I listed one of the excuses the Obama Campaign has made, one that his supporters have made, and one of my own. And that somehow is an attack?

And you can infer what you want, but that doesn't make your inferences lucid.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #122
123. you know what you were doing
don't back pedal now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #123
125. LOL...right..
Because you can see right through me, right?

People ask why Wright was invited to the White House and I remind them that that was long before he gave his more offensive sermons.


Like I said earlier...

Go play with someone else, the Rabid Response bit is getting a little old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #125
129. It is getting old because you can't handle it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #129
133. Can't handle what?
You baseless attempt at calling me a liar?

Your terrible spelling, capitalization, and overall bitter attitude?

I guess you are right...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #133
137. complaining about my rapid response
sounds like complaining about being asked the first question
then you become the grammar police on a web board, little elitist aren't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #137
140. Not an elitist at all.
And I don't believe I mentioned anything about grammar.

You are either 'sour' or 'bitter.'

And I sure don't like being called a liar or dishonest when it is obviously unfounded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #78
114. so how is that different then Obama/Ayers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #114
118. As soon as you have proof of Farrakhan using his home to host
a fundraiser for Hillary, then you will have made a valid comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #118
132. lots of people host fundraisers, so what?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #132
134. Don't you think that is indicative of a much closer relationship?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:53 PM
Original message
"you are nothing but a hypocrite and you know it" Can't you have a post without name-calling??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
55. It's only name calling if its not true
in this case it is true, so I'm innocent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
153. Here's some more stuff you might want to ask your "girl" - like
what did she know and when did she know it about the 'blood plasma gone bad sales' from Ark prison system while the Clintons were in the governor's mansion? Or the presidential pardons of a group of P.R suspected terrorists and subsequently getting a large percentage of the Hispanic vote in her first senate campaign. And how about her moving to New York to run for the senate pushing aside an almost shoe-in for that dem seat rather than going home to Arkansas with the resultant loss of a dem seat in that state.

HRC is all about HRC, and to heck with the party or anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #37
58. Bring it on....
Hillary can and will take any questions thrown at her. She will answer with confidence and truth, unlike Obama. Just bring it on. She is the one standing ready for debates. She is Presidential while Obama is hiding from them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #58
68. you mean the candidate complaining because she not treated
fairly, then tells people go watch SNL because they know what I'm talking about. That candidate that complained because I get the questioned answered first, the one who couldn't get right the new Russian leader, since her mantra is she is ready on day one. maybe you are right if by take any question you mean lying in your answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #68
71. She flubbed a Russian name and that is your proof?
Jeeeeeze
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #71
75. Thats not enough
what tough embarrasing question has she been asked over and over in debates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #75
79. Diamonds or Pearls?
Find someone else to play Rabid Response with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #79
99. are you kidding, that played to her base
I'm your girl, you know the one vote for me because I'm a woman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #75
89. You are the one whinning. Go look at the transcripts and some back prepared next time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #89
100. you can't backup your case
so you want me to do it for, lazy,lazy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #100
104. you are one making the claim. and you want me to do your work. get a life!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #104
109. get a life!, I guess you know when to walk away with
your tail between your legs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #109
113. "your tail between your legs" You lie and distract. I see you still have not
backed up your claim.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #113
115. yes I have, I guess that tail is getting a little longer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #68
80. I'm sure you post makes sense...
but I'll be damned if I can understand a word of it.

Whatever!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #80
101. I'm not surprised I've read your post
and I have gathered the you are intellectually challenged:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #68
93. How many pillows do you need??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #58
147. Let's see how she handles questions about nuking Iran, or about insulting New Zealand's PM?
All she has is lies and spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
17. Debate who?
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 01:28 PM by jefferson_dem
Isn't it a bit too early for Barack and McLame to go at it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #17
42. you are out of touch -that is what happens when you have your head in the sand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
18. Clinton Launches Conversation on Oregon's Priorities with 'Oregon Compact'


http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=7275


4/23/2008
Hillary Clinton Launches Conversation on Oregon's Priorities with 'Oregon Compact'
Clinton Challenges Obama to Two Debates to Continue Focus on Oregon Issues

Hillary Clinton today released the "Oregon Compact", a ten-part plan to work with the people of Oregon to help address the challenges and further innovative solutions developed by the state. She also urged Sen. Barack Obama to join her in discussing these issues in two Oregon debates, including a session focused on rural issues.

Click here to download video of Hillary’s statement on her Oregon compact and proposed debates.

Click here to download audio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
20. NO MORE DEBATES
I was sick of these faux debates a year ago. And Teddy K.my friend. Shame on you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #20
38. "And Teddy K.my friend. Shame on you" Why are you saying this to me??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
21. No need for more debates.
It's all over but hillary's tears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. making silly claims will not make her go away.



......It's all over but hillary's tears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
23. The Super D's may pull the plug on her campaign before OR anyway...
I'm not against another (make that a 23rd or 24th) debate - but when is enough enough?

If Obama wins N.C. and Indiana, Hillary would have to win 90% (or more)of the remaining delegates to even tie Obama. The math will be so OBVIOUS by then, that I can't fathom any rationalization worth staying in the fight.

As it stands now (per Chuck Dodd political talking head on MSNBC) even if Hillary splits the delegates 50/50 in N.C. and Indiana (unlikely), she would then need to win 85% of the remaining delegates to catch Obama.

The Super D's will not let the party flush millions of dollars and volunteer hours down the drain when it could otherwise go to fighting McSame.

Sorry, but my guess is it will be over before OR votes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #23
76. Polls say the people want the primary to continue. They are not foolish to go against the will
of the people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Audio_Al Donating Member (536 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #76
124. Quibble this: Millions of us HAVEN'T EVEN VOTED YET.
This is Oregon. We don't have our mail-in ballots. Neither candidate should pull out until everyone votes.

What is the matter with people on this site?

Respectfully,

Al
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #124
135. They like the result 3/4s through the game. That is all.
All the cries of "Save the Democratic Party" are disingenuous at best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #124
143. This is a good reason we should have 1 or 2 national primary dates
I'm not happy with the system, but more than anything I want us to kick McCain war mongering ass this fall. It's a shame we are wasting so many resources on a race which (particularly by Oregon) will be out of reach for Hillary.

It's about winning this fall - that IMO takes precedent. Alas, looks like you and even Puerto Rico will be voting before Hillary's plug is pulled by the SuperD's.

I'm telling ya, they will not go against the will of the pledged delegates - it will never happen.

For the future, I'm all for a national primary date and to chuck the entire SuperD's system into the garbage. It really has nothing to do with democracy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #124
146. I am one who wants the primaries to go on. It is beyond the pale that
obama fans have been calling for her to bow out for a couple of months now.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
25. I'd sign it, if the debates had referees instead of moderators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
26. FORGET IT!
Hillary should buy her own airtime if she wants to get her smears out.

If she cant afford it, thats just tough sh*t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Yep. And under the bus campaign finance reform goes...
NT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
30. And Obama has every right to ignore that petition
He earned the nomination - Hillary didn't, and there's no point in seeing a debate for the 23rd time. Obama should not accept any debates as long as he does not need to debate. See my OP for the reasons, and he should not accept any debates that is not sponsored by LCV, Sierra Club, Moveon.org, NARAL, or any union backers. No need for MSM to fuck it up any further.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. He should not risk screwing this up!!1!!11
He might have to think on his feet rather than give canned speeches.

That could be disastrous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #34
69. He needs to come prepared to respond to all quesions. --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #30
40. "He earned the nomination " How so?--by running away from debates in IN and NC??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Audio_Al Donating Member (536 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #40
126. He didn't seem to want to solve the Florida and Michigan problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
31. K&R&S
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
44. I'm an Oregonian and signed the petition this morning.
I'm sure the moderators will be all sweetness and light to Obama next time around. Maybe they can ask him, as a "Constitutional Law Professor," his opinion of the controversies surrounding the 2004 election, particularly with regard to the disenfranchisement of so many minority voters and disproportionate allocation of voting machines in Ohio.

A question for both of them, I'd like to hear their response as to how they think Colin Powell as a veep to McCain will affect the general dynamics of the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #44
52. I would like them both to talk of their enviromental plans. I imagine oregon
moderators would get in questions about the enviroment.

I used to live in portland. my sister lives in salem. Miss Oregon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #52
70. Environmental questions would be very important for undecideds.
Between southern Oregon burning itself down every summer and protecting Crater Lake...

I would really like to know where they stand on specific enviromental positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #52
74. Agreed. I believe the environment is of paramount concern in the Northwest.
Let's throw in some questions about biofuels, too *cough Exelon cough*

I love Oregon :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdx_prog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
46. Ted has lost his freaking mind....
Hillary doesn't stand a chance here....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #46
94. "Hillary doesn't stand a chance here." SADDLE UP--HERE SHE COMES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Audio_Al Donating Member (536 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #94
141. We're all saddled up... (PHOTO)
Pay no attention to the seguaro cactus in the background!



Call me Al --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #141
142. very nise photo. thanks for sharing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #46
95. btw---Do you the lastest polls regarding Oregon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
49. What "debate"? They're both moderates and agree on the issues.
Hilly and her supporters are grasping at the last straws in her quiver.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #49
83. wrong. they differ on guns, NCLB, taxes, Soc Sec. health insur plans to name
a few
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #83
107. Only in miniscule ways.
Because they are both moderates with slight differences the "debate" would quickly degenerate to flag pins, preachers, and other heart-stopping, meaningless, trivia that the media adore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wowimthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
51. obama isn't afraid to debate her... He doesn't want her shill moderators conducting the...
the debate. He doesn't want people who worked for her at one point in time conducting these debates. He doesn't want another 3 on one. It's obvious that some of the Clinton supporters want to do to Obama what the Right wing did to their candidate. It's hypocritical. He shouldn't accept debates unless the moderators are unbiased... say a PBS moderator who will talk about the issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #51
60. Obama needs to come prepared to answer all questions-just as Hillary needs
to be prepared.

Last time Obama was not prepared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
57. Petition Signed...
Go Hillary. We can't elect a President that fears debates.

Thanks for posting, Rodeo.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #57
63. Thanks--be sure to pass to all you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Audio_Al Donating Member (536 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #63
127. We signed with vigor. Thank you.
Call me Al --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
62. Rant and rave all you want. The race is over in NC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goletian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
65. yeah, lets set up the 1000th debate so hillary can get another piece of shit troll
to ask ridiculous questions -- ones he got from the far right morons like hannity -- on her behalf. the people have already chosen. if hillary wants more exposure to soften the fall of her chances at the nomination, shes gonna have to pay for it; no freebies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #65
110. "the people have already chosen" you are WRONG. Stop lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goletian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #110
117. youre the liar. a hillary lead in the elections is virtually impossible now.
get your head out of the clouds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
66. Why can't Hillary debat e herself. She holds two opinions on every issue
It would be entertaining...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #66
73. Hillary give serious detailed responses. She wants people to be informed, not entertained--that is
why she won the last debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #73
82. Yeah, Hillary is "duplicity in motion."
I feel nauseous after listening to HRC, not informed nor educated. :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
77. The ENTIRE Nation is freakin' tired of these asinine debates. ENOUGH ALREADY!!!
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #77
81. So tired that 10 Million People tuned in....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #81
88. And a LARGE percentage of them were *disgusted* with "flag pin" and "patriot" questions.
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 02:27 PM by ShortnFiery
The ABC debate was a figurative "hit job" on Obama from the intimidating questions to the *perfect lighting* for cameos of Chelsea, Wes Clark, Gov Rendel and Mayor Nutter. :wow: :grr:

ABC sunk so low THE VAST MAJORITY of objective Americans have *zero* trust that the M$M could run a HONEST "bake sale" much less a "political debate." :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #77
86. such arrogance to pretend to speak for the voters!! Rather like your leader!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #86
92. Not near as arrogant as your heroine and her husband who delusionally think they own OUR Party.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #92
97. Stop lying and we might have a discussion



......Not near as arrogant as your heroine and her husband who delusionally think they own OUR Party.
Posted by ShortnFiery
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #92
148. Don't bother with rodeodance, he's a lost cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #148
154.  Don't bother with Elrond Hubbard he's a lost cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #154
158. Yeah, what he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
85. debateoregon.com redirects to hillaryclinton.com - BULLSHIT!
Oh yeah - that's some unbiased will of the people movement alright. So the candidate that's out of money and falling behind wants free media exposure? What a fucking surprise.

I hope the Governor and all his fawning little cronies decide to hold their breath until Obama agrees.

Let 'em turn blue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
96. Hillary is such a horrendous loser.
Does she really think she can bully Obama into giving her free advertising?

Fuck you, Hillary! Spend some of your big 10 million dollar windfall, or was that just for paying debts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #96
98. It ws Obama who lost the last debate and PA---What is he afraid of??
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 02:56 PM by rodeodance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #98
111. He's not afraid of her, that's for sure.
But why would anyone give her a National Stage to spout smears and attacks from?

She has had her chance. She has lost.
There is no need to go over the same ground again.

Another debate would not give us anything new, it would only give her an opportunity to try and cause damage.

Fuck that! Hillary's time is up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #111
112. WRONG again. She as NOT lost. Stop lying




.....She has had her chance. She has lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #112
130. oh, she has lost. Only blind faith Hillarites cannot see this.
You should have read the writing on the wall whenever she got her ass kicked in your home state, of all places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
120. I see the strategy now: challenge him to neverending debates, don't let him do any campaigning
You know, awhile back I jokingly suggested that Hillary would challenge Obama to twice-weekly debates. I didn't realize that she would actually do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raffi Ella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
128. Signed.
Barack needs to step up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #128
131. or saddle up. Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raffi Ella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #131
138. .
:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
136. If the League of Women Voters will consent to run the debate
and it's held under one of the half-dozen formats defined for formal debate, and the adjudicators are undecided super-delegates who will pledge their vote to the candidate whom they say won the debate, and a practiced moderator is selected from the world of formal debate, then, sure, Senator Obama should think about it. But only think about it. Under any other set of circumstances, forget it.

For those of you unfamiliar with U.S. election debate history, note that the League of Women Voters ran the debates in 1976, 1980 and 1984. On October 2, 1988, the league's 14 trustees voted unanimously to pull out of the debates, and on October 3 they issued a press release:


"The League of Women Voters is withdrawing sponsorship of the presidential debates ... because the demands of the two campaign organizations would perpetrate a fraud on the American voter. It has become clear to us that the candidates' organizations aim to add debates to their list of campaign-trail charades devoid of substance, spontaneity and answers to tough questions. The League has no intention of becoming an accessory to the hoodwinking of the American public."

LMV on Debate sponsorship



(note: the idea of a moderator from the world of formal debate isn't mine, it was surfaced in this thread: depakid's thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
139. No more so called "debates". ABC proved that these aren't debates, they are opportunities
for the republican owned networks to take potshots at our candidates. If the League of Women Voters run a debate on a public network, I'm in, otherwise no deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
144. another opportunity for HRC to spew rw talking points with help from the corpmedia?
no thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #144
155. It's an opportunity BHO to show he is not weak. He needs to come prepared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #155
156. LWV moderator? Real debate rules? SD as judges?
How about those things? Or is it just a drumbeat for another ABC-style debacle?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #156
159. this call is coming straight from Hillary's camp...so she will be pushing for what benefits her...
what benefits her is another ABC-style debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #159
164. obama should have been out front asking for the debates--Now with his
refusal in NC it makes him look weak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #164
166. i'm not sure if it does or not. any polls indicate how this is perceived?
debates benefit Clinton more than they do Obama at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #166
173. not that i know of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #173
175. since i know du'ers have different views of it...but we're all political junkies...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #164
169. And the change in debate sponsor? The moderators?
A formal framework to keep the thing on track? Debate wonks to frame the questions as questions instead of attempts at 'gotcha's', how about those ideas?

What do you think of only doing it if the League of Women Voters can be convinced to run it again? They stepped away from it in 1988 when it started to get too silly, how about putting them back in charge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #155
157. I didn't feel Obama was weak at the last debate.
Anyway, if they're going to focus on silly nonissues, I don't see the point.
If they insist on it, then they should give equal time to both.
Hammering away at only Hillary or Obama is unproductive.
And yes, I felt that Russert was too hard on Clinton for the MSNBC debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #157
162. equal time would be great. The media will
do what it wants. but given the long time spent of issues that
many did not care for, lets hope they cut back on them.--time wise at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #162
165. when they stick to issues, I like Clinton.
I strongly disagree with her hawkish foreign policy of late, but she always sounds strongest when discussing solid issues. She's at her weakest when she's attacking, because she just plain looks bad when she's being sarcastic or snarky.
Honestly, that's what has hurt her in the debates...if it stuck to policy and only policy, she'd beat Obama overall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #162
170. hey, can you check out this thread and contribute your thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
160. Have it moderated by Thom Hartmann and I'm fine with it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
161. No way for her to win, why debate her?eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amelia Donating Member (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
168. signed and sent to friends
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #168
171. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
172. The good Guv jumped the shark
on his endorsement. That may prove to be a mistake on his part. I note that Congressman Wu today Endorsed Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #172
174. ....
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:06 AM
Response to Reply #174
176. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC