Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wow, I didn't know all this about the terrorist that Bill Clinton pardoned.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:21 PM
Original message
Wow, I didn't know all this about the terrorist that Bill Clinton pardoned.
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 01:27 PM by LoZoccolo
Evans began working in the May 19th Communist Movement splinter from the Weather Underground to develop clandestine armed urban violence as part of a multi-level overall revolutionary strategy. Evans was arrested on May 11, 1985 and charged with acquisition of weapons, ID, safe houses, finances, political and military training and actions to bring terrorist activity in the U.S. Targets of these activities included the U.S. Capitol Building, National War College, Navy Yard Computer Center and Navy Yard Officers Club, Israeli Aircraft Industries, the FBI office and New York Patrolmen's Benevolent Association.

She received a 40 year sentence, which was commuted by President Bill Clinton January 20, 2001.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linda_Sue_Evans

It looks like she wanted to be even more radical than the Weather Underground! :wow: That's fucken scarey. :scared: No thanks, Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dude...don't go there
That's below the belt...leave that for the RWers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I know that Senator Clinton is a good woman and I respect her greatly...
...but I think this is an issue that certainly the Republicans will be raising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. this is an issue that certainly the Republicans will be raising
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 01:29 PM by DJ13
Ah, but thats not fair!

Only Hillary is supposed to be allowed to test out RW talking points, and only on Obama.

Its not allowed to use her campaign bullcrap against her!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yeah but the problem with those tactics is that they force you to be a bastard.
I cannot go that route. Sorry.

It's not a question of strength but of moral fiber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Yes, it's a goddamned shame Hillary went this way
In February.

Clinton Camp Pushes O-Bomber Links: Ignores Her Own Radical Ties

By JUSTIN ROOD
Feb. 22, 2008


The Hillary Clinton campaign pushed to reporters today stories about Barack Obama and his ties to former members of a radical domestic terrorist group -- but did not note that as president, Clinton's husband pardoned more than a dozen convicted violent radicals, including a member of the same group mentioned in the Obama stories.

"Wonder what the Republicans will do with this issue," mused Clinton spokesman Phil Singer in one e-mail to the media, containing a New York Sun article reporting a $200 contribution from William Ayers, a founding member of the Weather Underground, to Obama in 2001. (Obama's ties to the radical group first surfaced last week in a Bloomberg News article.)

In a separate e-mail, Singer forwarded an article from Politico.com reporting on a 1995 event at a private home that brought Obama together with Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, another former member of the radical group.

Opting to leave any attacks on the issue to the GOP may be wise, as attacks from Clinton could backfire. In his final day in office, President Clinton pardoned another one-time member of the Weather Underground, Susan L. Rosenberg, after she had served 16 years in prison on federal charges.

-snip

And in 1999, President Clinton also pardoned 16 violent Puerto Rican nationalists responsible for more than 100 bombings of U.S. political and military installations, after they promised to renounce violence. The attacks reportedly killed six people and wounded dozens more. In justifying the pardons, President Clinton noted none of the men had been convicted of crimes that resulted in death or injuries.



http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=4330128&page=1

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Bastard? For what?
Bringing up the fact that this woman was sentenced and Bill Clinton got rid of the sentence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. The Weather Underground was a by product of its time
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 02:02 PM by YOY
It needs to be looked at in such terms.

They were hardly the Al Queda or even the Michigan Militia... While I don't condone their actions I don't think I can say they were horrible monsters either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. How many people were in that group again?
At it's peak when it split from SDS, maybe 300? And that quickly dwindled down to like, what? 50? 30? If they were such a product of the time that they were not responsible for their own actions, wouldn't there have been more people that got swept up by the times?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. Actually, what Hillary has done is more of a Republican tactic than I first thought.
You know that trick they pull when they accuse their opponents of something that they are guilty of to a greater degree? It looks like Hillary pulled that trick here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. but it will toughen her up...
this is good practice for her--she needs to know what to expect in the GE, remember?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. McCauliffe said anything in public was on the table
He said Ayers, Bitter, Wright, anything is in play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. There's things I can LOL or agree with or even rip on the Hillerites for.
This I cannot.

Sorry... :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Asgaya Dihi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Normally I'd agree with you
But not this time. The Weather Underground became a legitimate issue in this campaign when Hillary Clinton stood up in the last debate and said that she thought Barrack having simply lived near or sat on a board with a member of the same group was relevant. A member who was not convicted.

Given her attempt to smear him with a relationship to the group that's much looser than hers I think she has little room to complain about anything being below the belt. If she wasn't throwing out right wing tactics left and right she'd be hit with a lot less of them herself.

Obama shouldn't do it, but I see no reason why we can't talk about it. She's the one who said the issue was relevant. She just thought we were going to hit someone else with it at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Just imagine how nasty Obama could be if he got in the gutter with Hillary.
To hear her screech that she is "better vetted" makes me LMAO.

She has skeletons piled high in the closet; it's just that nobody has opened the door lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. What if he made Hillary unelectable in the general election, so superdelegates have to vote for him?
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 01:28 PM by LoZoccolo
This would be a mirror of the Tonya Harding strategy that Hillary is pursuing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. "Lately" is EXACTLY the right word
She thinks she's been vetted and perhaps for her WH years she was.

However, Bill's behavior since leaving office has been questionable
to say the least when it comes to his business "associates" and if
she's the nominee, we'll be hearing about him pushing for Dubai to
control our ports, we'll hear about his trip to Kazakhstan with the
Canadian "businessman" and plenty of other details. Maybe even
about how he's been spending his time while his wife has been at
work in D.C. ... We DO NOT KNOW everything about this couple by a
long shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. It's a testament to Obama that he hasn't gone as dirty as she has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. She didn't know, either (wink)


-snip

You can watch the video below. If it's true, it means that she got the worst briefings in the world when she was running for Senate in 2000 and the clemency issue was hot in Rockland County, and it means that Chuck Schumer didn't even bother to mention the issue to his fellow NY senator-elect/ First Lady after promising the widows of two dead cops to fight against one of the clemencies.

Here's the chronology:

On October 19, 2000, as Hillary was hunting for Senate votes throughout New York, Rockland County's biggest paper, the Journal News, ran a front page story reporting that imprisoned radical Susan Rosenberg -- linked to the 1981 Weather Underground Brinks robbery that left two Nyack cops dead -- was seeking clemency from Bill Clinton.

The next day, the widows and fellow state and local police attended a memorial service for the two dead cops at the site of the killings. Also in attendance: Sen. Chuck Schumer, who in that fall was frequently campaigning with Hillary. According to another front page story, on Oct. 21, he made a pledge to the widows to fight the clemency: "I intend to take our opposition as high as I can in government."

On December 16, 2000, after Hillary became New York's Senator-elect, the paper did another Page 1 story about an upcoming 60 Minutes episode on Rosenberg's clemency application. It included a quote from one of her new constituents, Diane O'Grady, wife of one of the dead cops: "This is a woman who has taken lives."
On December 17, 2000, the "60 Minutes" piece on Rosenberg's case and clemency request ran.

So, Clinton -- in her effort to avoid being connected in any way to the case -- now says she knew nothing about it. Nobody briefed her, either while she was running or after she was elected, on an emotional hot-button issue that intersected her husband with her constituents. Her husband, who invited her to sit in on a White House meeting with another group of Rockland County residents seeking pardons for four Hasidic members of their community, never so much as mentioned Rosenberg.

-continues


Entire article
http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/2008/04/hill_on_brinks_radical_i_didnt.html



Video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zsrf4IrKHsE

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elmerdem Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. I'd say that article makes
it fair game. & I'll add that Shumer should go. He now doesn't think we're ready for national health care? WTF
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Fair Game - Hillary's campaign chairman says so, too
MCAULIFFE: I agree with Speaker Gingrich. Anything that's been out in the public is fair game.

HANNITY: All right.

MCAULIFFE: Are you kidding me? Wait until the general election, Sean.

HANNITY: Wait until -- yes, well, the Bill Ayers issue which we were on -- just like the Wright issue.

MCAULIFFE: Yes.

HANNITY: .we were on way ahead of anybody. You think that's a legitimate issue?

MCAULIFFE: I think everything is a legitimate issue. Hillary Clinton nothing has been taken off the table for her.


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/04/terry_mcauliffe_on_hannity_col.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. Here's a towel...
crawl out of the winger gutter and clean yourself off, you're just feeding the outrage beast...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Except they forgot that our beast is bigger than their beast. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
20. Wow. Clintons soft on terrorists, yet want to obliterate civilians!
Monstrous!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC