Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Axelrod: Working class whites haven't voted strong Dem in years. HRC says, "Screw 'em!"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:49 PM
Original message
Axelrod: Working class whites haven't voted strong Dem in years. HRC says, "Screw 'em!"
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 03:32 PM by flpoljunkie
Cover that, MSM!

MSNBC has reported several times today what Obama camp chief strategist David Axelrod said yesterday on NPR about working class whites not voting strongly Democratic in a long time--including the Clinton years.

"The white working class has gone to the Republican nominee for many elections, going back even to the Clinton years. This is not new that Democratic candidates don't rely solely on those votes."

What an obvious time for someone in the media to bring up Hillary's vitriolic remark at a 1995 Camp David meeting, after the Democrats lost control of Congress in '94--"Screw 'em," she told her husband. "You don't owe them a thing, Bill. They're doing nothing for you; you don't have to do anything for them."

Yet only Katie Couric has covered this story, to my knowledge--last Thursday night on the CBS Evening News. Why is the media suppressing this? Don't white, working class voters deserve to know what Hillary Clinton thought about them in 1995? The voters of Pennsylvania were essentially kept in the dark on this. Will the voters of Indiana be kept in the dark, as well?

Instead MSNBC has reported today that Bill Clinton is telling white, working class voters in North Carolina that Obama said he doesn't need your votes.

Video clip below. Begins about 9:35 on the tape.

http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/i_video/main500251.shtml?id=4025802n?source=search_video

Also covered by Sam Stein on Huffington Post: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/16/hillary-clinton-on-workin_n_97017.html

Academic Theda Skocpol was at this Camp David meeting and wrote about it on Talkingpointsmemo last week:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/theda-skocpol/my-recollection-of-the-19_b_97291.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. BO and his folk have turned white middle class voters against
him because of the , typical white person comment, the bitterness comment, and the white trash comment,. I just say screw BO and his supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You sound "bitter" Mags.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I think I am becoming bitter toward the BO folk that act so thuggish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Can you tell me what is "thuggish" about this post?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. aren't you a BO supporter, comes with the training.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. You continue to sound bitter, Mags.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. I don't care how I sound to BO folk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leftist Agitator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. What are "BO folk", exactly?
Is that what you call the race of merry dwarves who cobble your shoes for you at night?

I mean, that's the only logical explanation, since you're clearly delusional.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. sensitive much, BO call his crowd folk, just check it out.
You folk are totally desperate to bully others to your side. It doesn't work, sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leftist Agitator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. Who or what is BO?
This is the only BO that I know:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #20
34. Paranoia
not healthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. So in response to being called "typical white people" some white people.....
.......act like typical white people by getting upset at the uppity black person?

Is that what you mean?


(Ps, Im a white person in case you thought otherwise.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't care what you are, you folk have trash and bullied everyone on here that is not for BO.
You folks have already split the party and it will just get worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. folk? Can I call you "boy?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrell9584 Donating Member (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. uh, folk is not a term of derision
folk is a word that people of all races in the South use for people of all races. The word folks is a word that refers to people. Just like y'all. And if you honestly think the word "folk" has a racial connotation, well Christ, there is just no response. The word "folks" is as much a part of the culture here as saying "you guys" is in the North.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
35. Yeah, probably right I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. couldn't care less. BO calls you Folks, but you can call me boy anytime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. You can call me Barry,
Like BO's mother called him. Like all his friends called him up until Harvard.
You can call me 'folk' too. Like Barry does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ashy Larry Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Oh please. Maybe you should cry about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. far from crying, just puking over the sleze that is forked over here by you BO folk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ashy Larry Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
56. Waaaahhhh!
If you can't stand the heat...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TTUBatfan2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Your candidate and her supporters...
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 03:09 PM by TTUBatfan2008
have called me naive, a latte-sipping liberal, a trust fund baby, etc. all because I'm young and support Obama. The truth is, I'm far from any of those things (for instance, I don't support abortion and I think global warming is being exaggerated by the far left) but it didn't stop her and her supporters from mocking all of the young voters supporting Obama. He and his supporters are no more responsible for splitting the party than she and her supporters, so you can stop pretending that your side is completely innocent. Her campaign tactics, strictly from a political point of view, have been pretty damn divisive. Bill's seemingly dismissive treatment of black voters is pretty divisive I'd say. Your side is no better so quit fuckin' pretending she's innocent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. welcome to the world of politics, vote for who you want, If the Pied Piper
is for you , go for it, but remember that does not mean all us white trash folk will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TTUBatfan2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. another patronizing remark...
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 03:27 PM by TTUBatfan2008
typical BS. I'm quite familiar with how politics works. I voted for Kerry in '04 (my first time being able to vote) and I followed the 2000 election pretty closely. Just because I know how it works doesn't mean I have to take direct insults from Hillary ("the skies will open...") and her supporters that she won't denounce (Buffenbarger, Ed "Kool-Aid" Rendell), and then turn around to vote for that person. Not gonna happen. She's burned the bridge with me as far as I'm concerned. Likewise, if you feel insulted by Obama or his supporters, then you shouldn't take it either. But quit pretending your side is completely fucking innocent because THAT is a load of horseshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. sorry you misunderstood, Politics is hell, all is fair in politics, yes
both sides do it, I'm far from innocent. I just know that in the 40 something yrs. I have been voting, I have never experienced the hatred and disgust and the belittlement of any canidate. I don't care who you vote for, that is your decision, but, get it straight, BO is the one that said he could open up the skies. I haven't seen it yet, have you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TTUBatfan2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Actually he's been pretty damn honest...
and every time he says something honest, he gets harped on for it by Clinton and McCain. He's said all along that he will not be perfect, nobody's perfect. But he will treat the Constitution with respect (a huge issue for me), he will change our diplomacy around the world (I am vehemently anti-war...I am a true pro-lifer all the way around: anti-abortion, anti-death penalty, and anti-war), he will focus on spending money to rebuild our infrastructure (it's pretty pathetic when major freeway bridges are collapsing), and he will stand up for the poor (something he did even straight out of college). I do not agree with Obama on plenty of things, but I'm also not being told I don't matter by him like with Hillary's camp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. well chill and vote for him, I really don't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. heh Mags I'm with you! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #32
44. good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
41. another brillant post!
keep`m coming...ya screw bo and his supporters!



:yoiks::crazy: :woohoo: :crazy::yoiks::woohoo: :yoiks::woohoo: :yoiks::crazy::woohoo::crazy: :yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
66. I'm a white middle class guy.
I voted for Obama.

And I think your moronic attempts to spin everything here are pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. Working class whites have not voted for us as much as they used to, especially in 2000 and 2004.
Yes, let's repeat 2000 and 2004 and lose another election!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
40. Yes, let's make this person our Democratic nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. They dont call 'em "swing voters" for nothing.
If they can be fooled into thinking that ANY DEM is an "elite, racist terrorist"- then wait until McCain/media gets to tell them all about Hillary.

I would hope that either candidate can get the "working class" to vote in their best interests- but we just saw how easily they can be fooled by just pushing just a few buttons.

Its something both candidates should consider- these working class swing-voters seem easily swayed by lies, smears, buzz words and "Wille Horton" style associations...

Clinton just showed us how it can be used to one's advantage- so dont think McCain/media can do it too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. We have not won an election withour them. Axelrold is showing
the elitist view in that campaign. Bill Clinton won because
he had the Blue Collar vote.

If Axlerod thinks they can win with the Youth and African Americans
dividing the Independents with McCain, GOOOD Luck.

Kerry, Dukakis, the list goes on have not worked to get the blue collar
vote and they lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. I disagree with you that Obama will not work harder to gain more white working class support.
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 03:21 PM by Dr Fate
And I disagree that noting reality is taking an elitist view.

It's not elitist to note that working class swing-voters often swing republican, and that it is difficult to keep them on one side.

I stand by my point- if Obama or Hillary were to count on swing voters to not swing yet again, that would be a mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Bill did not receive a great deal of white working class support in either 1992 or 1996
But despite Clinton’s electoral success, it was not the case that he received a great deal of white working class support. He averaged only 41 percent across his two election victories. But he did, at least, prevent these voters from siding with his Republican opponents in large numbers, eking out one point pluralities among the white working class in both elections (the rest went to Perot).

http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/rc/papers/2008/04_demographics_teixeira/04_demographics_teixeira.pdf

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. He received enough white working class and also "Bubba"
votes to make the difference. Otherwise, Daddy Bush would have had
a second term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
55. If Kerry had performed as well with $50,000+ voters as Clinton did...
He would have won the election. If he had perofmred as well with under $50,000 voters he also would've won but by a slightly narrower margin.

Demographics have changed toward the $50,000+ range since Clinton left office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. 'screw 'em' is third hand gossip from a RW hack. Stop helping McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. Perhaps you should read the links. This quote comes from someone who was there at Camp David.
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 03:26 PM by flpoljunkie
And, wrote a book about this in 2001.

The statement -- which author Benjamin Barber witnessed and wrote about in his book, "The Truth of Power: Intellectual Affairs in the Clinton White House" -- was prompted by another speaker raising the difficulties of reaching "Reagan Democrats." It stands in stark contrast to the attitude the New York Democrat has recently taken on the campaign trail, in which she has presented herself as the one candidate who understands the working-class needs.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/16/hillary-clinton-on-workin_n_97017.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. Second hand gossip from a RW hack - at best. Stop helping McCain.
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 03:38 PM by MethuenProgressive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. The author, Ben Barber, was an invited participant at the Camp David retreat where this transpired.
In January 1995, as the Clintons were licking their wounds from the 1994 congressional elections, a debate emerged at a retreat at Camp David. Should the administration make overtures to working class white southerners who had all but forsaken the Democratic Party? The then-first lady took a less than inclusive approach.

"Screw 'em," she told her husband. "You don't owe them a thing, Bill. They're doing nothing for you; you don't have to do anything for them."

The statement -- which author Benjamin Barber witnessed and wrote about in his book, "The Truth of Power: Intellectual Affairs in the Clinton White House" -- was prompted by another speaker raising the difficulties of reaching "Reagan Democrats." It stands in stark contrast to the attitude the New York Democrat has recently taken on the campaign trail, in which she has presented herself as the one candidate who understands the working-class needs.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/16/hillary-clinton-on-workin_n_97017.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. So, in your mind 'working class whites' are 'Reagan Democrats' and all gossip is true?
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 03:45 PM by MethuenProgressive
No wonder you're not a Progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. This is not gossip, and your assertion is absurd. You have either not read the links or choose to
ignore their content.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Someone claims he heard someone said she said something, with no other confirmation.
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 03:54 PM by MethuenProgressive
That's gossip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Wrong again! You might want to read this post and then try and say it's gossip.
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 04:14 PM by flpoljunkie
The statement -- which author Benjamin Barber witnessed and wrote about in his book, "The Truth of Power: Intellectual Affairs in the Clinton White House" -- was prompted by another speaker raising the difficulties of reaching "Reagan Democrats." It stands in stark contrast to the attitude the New York Democrat has recently taken on the campaign trail, in which she has presented herself as the one candidate who understands the working-class needs.

Late Update: The Clinton campaign put me in touch with Don Baer, President Clinton's speech writer at the time, who had attended the same meeting. He says: "I don't remember anything along those lines, at all. And I certainly don't remember Senator Clinton saying anything like that... they have their recollections of that, that is their business. The conversation, from my perspective, was moderated in tone."

He did not, it should be noted, directly challenge the interpretations of Barber and Boyte.

Baer's comments came at roughly the same moment that The New Republic published a blog post by Alan Wolfe, a professor of political science at Boston College, who was also at the retreat and says he too heard the quote. Noting Carson's remark -- "So, you've got two guys we've barely heard of remembering a verbatim quote from 13 years ago?... Sounds totally and completely reliable" -- Wolfe writes: "Make that three. I was there. I hope people have heard of me. And Barber and Boyte have it right."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/16/hillary-clinton-on-workin_n_97017.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Am still waiting for your reponse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knixphan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
46. kick for the light of truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
47. This racial polarization is fucking madness; it MAY win a primary, but it WILL lose the GE. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
49. Is Axelrod implying the working class is obsolete & their interests no longer core of Dem platform?
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 05:35 PM by Leopolds Ghost
Sure sounds like it to me.

All these wishy washy statements -- all much worse than anything Kerry
said -- pile up to suggest a candidate and a culture around him that is
essentially saying "I won't go as far as Hillary. I won't say "screw em"
but... those jobs aren't coming back, they need to be retrained and move
on with their lives."

Any Obama supporters prepared to make the case to me (this weak Obama fan)
that Obama is a populist --

someone who actually understands Thomas Frank
and Michael Lind, much less Wellstone et al?

Or is this just Tweedledee and Tweedledum arguing over who
is less unpopular with a group of voters they intend to abandon
to the Republicans -- and with it, the premise of the New Deal?

And all too many working class whites buy into it, saying:

"fuck you, I ain't bitter and I'M NOT WORKING CLASS, I'm * MIDDLE CLASS *
goddamnit! Working class people are those ----s who replaced my daddy at
the steel mill -- who needs them? I may be starving but I'M NOT WORKING
CLASS and I don't need handouts like those ---s!"

Thus, the destruction of the New Deal and the myth that we are a post-industrial economy,
and not an imperial one based on off-shore industry at slave wages, like ancient Rome or Athens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. You ask uncomfortable questions
But valid.

I'd like to see some responses, but you probably won't get any.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. Hardly.
Labor

Obama will strengthen the ability of workers to organize unions. He will fight for passage of the Employee Free Choice Act. Obama will ensure that his labor appointees support workers' rights and will work to ban the permanent replacement of striking workers. Obama will also increase the minimum wage and index it to inflation to ensure it rises every year.
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/economy/#labor

Invest in U.S. Manufacturing: The Obama comprehensive energy independence and climate change plan will invest in America's highly-skilled manufacturing workforce and manufacturing centers to ensure that American workers have the skills and tools they need to pioneer the first wave of green technologies that will be in high demand throughout the world. Obama will also provide assistance to the domestic auto industry to ensure that new fuel-efficient vehicles are built by American workers.
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/economy/#innovation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. No, he's not. Your assertion is absurd on its face.
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 06:03 PM by flpoljunkie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #49
67. I think he is implying..
that....
"The white working class has gone to the Republican nominee for many elections, going back even to the Clinton years. This is not new that Democratic candidates don't rely solely on those votes."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonestonesusa Donating Member (630 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
52. A couple of things...
While Obama is basically a team player for the Democratic party and would hesitate to use this "screw em" video in a primary campaign, Republicans may not show the same restraint in the GE. We can pretend that HRC is a working class populist and not a multimillionaire who supported the Iraq War just like McCain, but beyond the Democratic primary I don't think this pretense will hold.

Plus, you can see from these links that the primary strength of HRC is not simply with white working class voters, it is with white women voters and older white voters. These voters are overrepresented in Pennsylvania, as is discussed in the NPR story and in the CNN exit polling results. You can see that information in the links below. Obama will have to work to get some of these votes, no question, just as Hillary Clinton will have to work hard to get strong support from the black community as did Clinton I. I also think that Clinton's big state argument ignores some other key states in the Midwest that are a must hold for the Democrats in the GE: Iowa, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Missouri. The Upper Midwest has quite a few strongly progressive Democrats that are not as friendly to HRC, and McCain is a potential contender there.

Obama's strengths among many white voters in states such as Idaho, Utah, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, and Vermont is often dismissed by HRC supporters. Partisanship is one thing - but it's the ability of Democrats to organize nationally and and prevail in key races is the goal.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89862939
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/epolls/#PADEM

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. You make very good points--particularly the GOP would not hesitate to use the "Screw 'em" comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StevieM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
57. But Hillary never really said that. Obama's supporters were lying, remember? (eom)
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 06:20 PM by StevieM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. You may want to read post #42. She absolutely did say, "Screw 'em!" in regard to working class Dems
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StevieM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. All three are lying at the request of Sen. Obama. The chances of this "story" coming out, by pure
coincidence, at the same time as bitter-gate, are statistically astronomical.

Steve
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. You, Steve, are truly delusional! People were reacting to Hillary's hypocrisy.
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 06:37 PM by flpoljunkie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #59
62. Of course
Dirt about a major(final 3) contender in a presidential race coming out in the middle of a fairly heated race could never happen on its own. I mean, statistically, that is just impossible. Dirt in campaigns has to take its time and come in a nice orderly fashion, one at a time, lined up for easy consumption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. Are you perhaps referring to the "bitter" story put out by Huffpo writer who also donated to Fred-
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 07:26 PM by flpoljunkie
Thompson? Now, that looks like a hit job on Obama right before the "make or break for Hillary" Pennsylvania primary, quakerboy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. Hit Jobs all around
But which one did the media run with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #59
65. I think it's a seek and you will find thing..
and it's not unusual to fight fire with fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
61. Obamites don't get it. It isn't about winning the white vote. It is about not getting 35-40%
Ask Walter Mondale how that works the next time you see him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC