IndianaJones
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 08:48 AM
Original message |
Obama's pre-emptive conventional missile strikes against a nuclear weapon equipped Iran... |
|
are preferable to nuclear strikes. Conventional missile strikes have been shown to not hurt as bad.
|
John Q. Citizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 08:50 AM
Response to Original message |
1. What are you talking about? Is this a dream you had last night? |
IndianaJones
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
the United States must first address Iran’s attempt to gain nuclear capabilities by going before the United Nations Security Council and lobbying the international community to apply more pressure on Iran to cease nuclear activities.
That pressure should come in the form of economic sanctions, he said.
|
panader0
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 08:56 AM
Response to Original message |
msongs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. maybe he refers to Obama's claim that all options are on the table & it's ok to invade pakistan nt |
IndianaJones
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Obama stated that a radical Muslim clerics with nuclear weapons was worse... |
|
than the ramifications of pre-emptive missile strikes.
|
Occam Bandage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 09:25 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Hey, and here I thought you were just a bot that randomly copy-pasted "McClurkin" and "homophobe." |
|
Turns out you can apply your warped stream-of-consciousness perspective to foreign policy, too. Whaddyaknow.
|
RaleighNCDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Hello?
HEY, MCFLY! YOU IN THERE?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 12th 2024, 08:29 AM
Response to Original message |