JKaiser
(569 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 09:32 AM
Original message |
I think we should have a debate with hillary, Obama, and McCain in it |
|
That way we can see who is the strongest candidate to go up against McCain in the fall..
|
mcctatas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 09:34 AM
Response to Original message |
|
then Hillary and McCain could tag-team Obama. It's a horrible idea when there are 2 people running against each other for the right to run against one...
|
LakeSamish706
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 09:36 AM
Original message |
The only thing is, then it would become crystal clear what Clinton has been doing... |
|
to Obama and it would be out there for all to see.
|
JKaiser
(569 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
6. Or Maybe Obama and hillary will gang up on MCCain... |
|
Could possibly bring dems together..
|
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 09:35 AM
Response to Original message |
2. It think it would be instructive for voters to have McCain in a debate with |
|
a high school senior on the debate team.
My money's on the kid versus McCrazy.
|
joeybee12
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 09:35 AM
Response to Original message |
3. I think Hilary would come out on top since she's the stronger debater... |
|
...however, but she and BO would do well, and, if nothing else, would put to rest the hand-wringing of so many Dems when they see either against McLame and see just how bad he is and how easy he can be beaten.
|
JKaiser
(569 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 09:36 AM
Original message |
It is probably a bad idea and won't happen.. |
Ganja Ninja
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 09:36 AM
Response to Original message |
earthside
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 09:36 AM
Response to Original message |
|
A debate between a Republican, a Democrat and a Clintonite.
|
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 09:37 AM
Response to Original message |
7. No way. Clinton has already shown that she will side with mccain against Obama |
|
when she said she and mccain were qualified to be president, but Obama isn't.
There is no doubt in my mind that it would be two against one, Obama against clinton and mccain, and that is bullshit
Let our nominee be choosen first then the debates against mccain begins
|
JKaiser
(569 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. I don't think she would publicly take sides with McCain.. She would join forces with Obama |
|
and make people realize that both Hillary and Obama are better than McCain.. It would bring dems together..
|
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
14. I disagree. She already went public in ads stating her position that she and mccain |
|
Edited on Fri Apr-25-08 09:52 AM by still_one
were qualified to be president, and Obama wasn't
If she would have left out mccain in that assertion, I would agree with you, but I have no trust in what she says
though with great reluctance, I would vote for her if she is our nominee in the general election
|
MindMatter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
12. The only debating and the only campaigning from this point |
|
is Obama versus McCain.
Hillary had 21 chances to make her case in debates with Obama, and lost. Surely that is enough debates for the primary season. On to the real thing.
|
johnlal
(974 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 09:41 AM
Response to Original message |
8. I'll go one step further |
|
Why not let them all run in the General. Sen. Clinton is determined to stay in this race until the bitter end. I wouldn't be surprised to see her repeat what Lieberman did in 2006-- leave the party and run as an independent.
|
guyanakoolaid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 09:41 AM
Response to Original message |
10. If you're going to have Clinton, might as well have Huckabee and Romney and every other loser |
|
she's insignificant at this point
|
JKaiser
(569 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. She hasn't lost yet.. |
|
I like it that hillary is a fighter.. It makes me trust that she can change things for the better.. Obama hasn't shown that in the slightest.
|
MindMatter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. Neither have Romney and Huckabee |
|
They don't officially lose until the convention. Same as Hillary.
The only difference is that they have enough honor, self respect, and concern for the party to do the right thing.
|
guyanakoolaid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
guyanakoolaid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
She could still win all of the remaining contests by more than a 2:1 margin over Obama, only around 70% of the vote.
:eyes:
|
City Lights
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-25-08 09:52 AM
Response to Original message |
16. I don't need a 3-way to know the answer to your question. nt |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:18 PM
Response to Original message |