Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can we start narrowing down the field a bit now? NOT A FLAME

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ludwigb Donating Member (789 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 01:02 PM
Original message
Can we start narrowing down the field a bit now? NOT A FLAME
With the latest financial figures and the primaries just weeks away, who is still in the game? Over at Dailykos they have been giving odds. I'm not going to go there, but I think it's pretty clear that Gephardt and Clark are now Dean's most realistic challengers, with about equal chances. Gephardt will likely get a publicity boost for finishing 1-2 in Iowa which will give him an opening, while Clark is now the soundest challenger financially and the best positioned to pick up the Lieberman/Edwards money and support.

After Gephardt and Clark there is Kerry, who might suprise in Iowa and finish strong in New Hampshire. And then Edwards and Lieberman, although I think they are pretty close to finished at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. If yesterday's CNN/Gallup Poll is of any indication..
Dean can win pretty easily in a head-to-head match against any one of them. I'm not sure if I believe this (!), but I'm also wondering about the implications of such a scenario. Attacks clearly aren't doing him in. A stumble on his part could, but his support is very solid..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eileen from OH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm a Dean supporter
but I'm really hoping that Edwards can stay in for awhile because, of all of them, he frames/phrases the economic issues best and I want him to get to say it for as long as possible.

eileen from OH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioStateProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kucinich will have raised a total of 8.5 million with the matching funds
no need for him to quit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Gephardt will be broke after Iowa
And much of the airtime in the later primary states will already have been purchased by Dean, Clark, and Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeacherCreature Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. I hope Carol M-B stays in
I am not really sure what the desire to narrow the field is all about. It doesn't bother me that there is a large field of candidates. It give the media less chance to write the official mediawhore storyline.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. NMC is the motto of some.
Not My Candidate.
I love what ALL contribute to the debate.Well, almost all. It's not as if we have any candidates who are not better than Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iowapeacechief Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. The "front loaded" calendar...
...of caucuses and primaries will narrow the field fast. Why go faster?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. welcome to DU iowapeacechief
:hi: and - I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. Let the early primaries run - some of the thinning out will occur
naturally - without trying to convince some people that one low digit candidate is still close but another with same polling should get out - that is where subjectivity comes in.

I am a democrat who believes in the democratic process including the primary process - suggesting thinning the field before a vote has been cost runs against my blood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellhathnofury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. As a Dean supporter I'd like all the candidates to remain in the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC