Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gallup Daily: Obama and Clinton Tied at 48% to 47%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:28 PM
Original message
Gallup Daily: Obama and Clinton Tied at 48% to 47%
PRINCETON, NJ -- The Democratic nomination race is now tied, with Barack Obama favored by 48% of national Democratic voters and Hillary Clinton by 47%

The latest results, based on Gallup Poll Daily tracking from April 22-24, include two days of interviews conducted entirely after Tuesday's Pennsylvania Democratic primary. Support for Clinton is significantly higher in these post-primary interviews than it was just prior to her Pennsylvania victory, clearly suggesting that Clinton's win there is the catalyst for her increased national support.

Obama's lead dwindled steadily all week, falling from a high of 10 percentage points in interviewing conducted in the three days just prior to the Pennsylvania primary. However, the percentage of Democrats supporting Obama has changed little (declining from 50% in April 19-21 polling to 48% today). Most of Clinton's increased support (from 40% to 47%) has come from previously undecided voters. (To view the complete trend since Jan. 3, 2008, click here.)

Both Clinton and Obama have experienced surges in support for their candidacies at various times since the start of the primary season -- several of them linked with primary wins and other high profile events -- only to see the race revert back to a near tie position. The last time Clinton moved into a significant lead over Obama was over a month ago, in mid-March, and that was only briefly. It remains to be seen whether Clinton will pull ahead of Obama in the next few days, or if she is able to sustain her current competitive positioning through and beyond the next round of primaries on May 6.

Clinton fares slightly better than Obama against John McCain in hypothetical matchups for the November election. Although both races are too close to call given the poll's margin of error, Clinton is running two points ahead of McCain, 47% to 45%, while Obama is running one point behind, 45% to 46%. -- Lydia Saad

http://www.gallup.com/poll/106822/Gallup-Daily-Obama-Clinton-Tied-48-47.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why does it seem like whoever is leading in the national vote, loses the state races?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. only a Hillarite would call 48 to 47 a tie.
Edited on Fri Apr-25-08 04:35 PM by JackORoses
I guess if 9 is double digits, 48 might as well equal 47.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thats the gallup headline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. LOL! You beat me to it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. See Post Six
I MADE A FUCKING POST... I DON'T SEE A REASON TO DISRESPECT ME, ESPECIALLY FROM THE ANONYMITY OF A COMPUTER MODEM...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. That's The Headline Verbatim From Gallup
If you don't want to be civil to me let me know...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. In all fairness it's a statistical tie
And honestly I think the double digits thing is stupid. The media would still be spinning her victory whether or not it was actually 9 points or "double digits".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. I Cited The Headline Verbatim
But , yeah, it isn't a tie...Gallup should know better...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. It's a statistical tie
Edited on Fri Apr-25-08 04:48 PM by Hippo_Tron
Statistics isn't an exact science. If it's within the margin of error, it's a statistical tie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Come on. You know statistically speaking 48 and 47 are the same in a poll.
There is no meaningful difference between the two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. It's the same math by which a 9% win is "double digits"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. Wasn't it 9-point-something and they rounded it up????
This is the kind of nit-picking crap that is destroying our party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. 9.2% doesn't round up to double digits
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Nit Picking Crap?
Lets make this easy for you....

Pretend you run a business, and you were hiring for a new mailroom clerk. in the interview, he assures you that he last earned $10 an hour, and has 1 year of experience.

You check his references, and find he only earned $9.40 an hour, and had only 10 months of experience. Would you consider it nit picking to deny him the job based on this dishonesty? I know how I would answer that question.

Lets then say that you also had an executive assistant, who you gave the company credit card and asked to buy a client a gift. There's $94 worth of credit available, and you specifically instruct your assitant to stay within the budget. She returns with a gift priced at $100. Is it nit picking to expect her to stay within the budget you outlined?

Is it nit picking to expect our candidates to be truthful, and hold them to a level of responsibility when they are not?

9.4 rounds to 9, not 10. Anything less than 10 points means single digits, not double digits. You may care, or not, but lets all be honest and not pretend that things are, when they are not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #28
38. Well, EXXXXXCCCCCUUUUUSSSSSSEEEEEE MMMMEEEE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. Quite to the contrary, its common to characterize close poll results that way. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. I Didn't Characterize Anything... Mr. Gallup (Sic) Did
PEACE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Roger! ... and out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
25. Because it's inside the poll's margin of error. You should know better. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. The gallup roller-coaster has made me nauseous.
up and down up and down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adoraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. 48=/=47
I know, I know, MoE. Still though, its not a tie.

It seems every single time it gets this close, the same exact thing happens.

Clinton people get really excited, and 3 days later Obama has a 10 point lead again.

I would wait before getting excited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. And look!
Obama can't beat McCain!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. Why does this matter anymore?
Edited on Fri Apr-25-08 04:43 PM by Patsy Stone
I'd like to see a Gallup of the remaining states -- at least that would be somewhat relevant.

On edit: This was not directed at the OP, just a general rhetorical question and thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
29. Agree completely with you, Patsy. The polls make me nauseated.
Edited on Fri Apr-25-08 05:17 PM by Radio_Lady
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Just like the stock market
if you watch it every day, you'll go nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Yeah, that too. Husband Audio Al periodically asks me if I want to see the stocks on....
the spreadsheet he uses every day.

Damned if I don't say "NO" unless he insists.

Every day, I assess my little budget and try to make ends meet. Then I go to the gym and try to cut down at least my end. I didn't get there today. So shoot me.

I just had a little glass of "creme de menthe" -- my tummy is aching and I'm going to take a nap.

Blessed be,

Radio Lady
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. I wonder what people will think when they are tied 55% - 45%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. Rounding up again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. See Post Six
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
18. First of all, it's not a tie. Secondly....
This poll is good for Obama because his support stayed at 48%. look for Hillary to go down from 47% in the next few days. Gallup is the only poll that shows a post PA bump. If there is an actual trend, which I doubt, it will be short-lived for Hillary. She will be back to 42% support in no time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
19. She will get a boost from PA, though not reflected in Rasmussen daily numbers as yet
but once that bounce fades Obama will take the lead again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
20. Not unexpected.
Go Mama. Democrats are beginning to see the light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Yeah? Look at the last time they were 'tied' on that graph, and then look at what happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Reminder
Hillary has often seen a bumb when sometime happens to Obama and then he rebounds.The same will
happen here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
31. ------- Hillary the comback gal~~~~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #31
39. ------Hillary, The gal who can't win no matter what happens~~~~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
35. Yes, what would you expect when the corporate media is fluffling Hillary nonstop...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
36. Part of the media manipulation, maybe? MSM shouting comeback.
Edited on Fri Apr-25-08 05:26 PM by MarjorieG
Short term memory and bringing peace to Irealnd, seven faces of Hillary, I don't buy it.

Really wish there'd be an explanation of what Rendell's machine might have done/did in suppressing the vote. All unverifiable machines, which never reassures. But same 2004 less allocation of machines, confusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnydrama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
37. this daily poll stuff is baloney
Does anybody believe that Obama went from 11 to 7 to 3 to -1 to 2 to 7 to 10 to 8 to 5 to 1.

And that any of that means anything?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
40. Not if you round that 1% up to 10%.
Edited on Fri Apr-25-08 10:53 PM by Kristi1696
What? Why not? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
41. Tied - except for that matter of Obama's 150 or so delegate lead.
Nice way to create a tight race where there isn't one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC