XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 12:16 PM
Original message |
Poll question: If Bill Clinton were running today, would you vote for him? |
|
:shrug:
(Constitutionality aside)
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message |
undeterred
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 12:20 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Depends who he was running against. |
|
Running against Obama? No way would I vote for Bill Cli nton.
|
Oleladylib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Anybody in the correct mind would! |
Moochy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Must have incorrect minds! |
La Lioness Priyanka
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message |
newmajority
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message |
6. No, and it has nothing to do with his wife |
|
I'm just over the Clinton myth. Just like the repukes have raised Ronald Reagan to mythological status, Democrats have done the same with Bill Clinton.
Yeah, the 90's seemed better compared to this decade, but what wouldn't? Truth is that the Clinton record included NAFTA, Don't Ask Don't Tell, Welfare "reform", the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which allowed FAUX Noize to exist, and AOL to buy CNN, the Indefensible Marriage Act, and the repeal of the Glass Stiegel act, which has a lot to do with the economic disaster that we're currently going through.
Clinton reality ain'r as sunny as the Clinton myth. And that's why I wouldn't vote for him again, even if it were possible.
|
Yael
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message |
7. NAFTA? Deregulation? Glass-Steagall? |
Joe Bacon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message |
|
No more school uniforms.
No more NAFTA.
No more phony Welfare "reform"
No more media deregulation.
No more phony healthcare reform that keeps the pimps running the insurance rackets in business.
No more Monicas.
|
RazBerryBeret
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message |
9. If I could turn back the clock to |
|
the Bill Clinton I knew and loved in the 90's .
yesterday's BC? not so much.
|
stevedeshazer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Why would I vote for someone who signed off on GATT and NAFTA? |
|
I haven't voted for him since 1992.
|
HysteryDiagnosis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Does actively campaigning against him fit into this tapestry |
blue sky at night
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message |
12. I have been a Democrat since.... |
|
The NIXON ERA...you know since I came to realize that everything Republican makes me sick to my stomach. I will never vote for a Republican as Long as I live...even for dog-catcher.
|
donheld
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message |
|
depends on who else is running.
|
RamboLiberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message |
14. No in the primary - yes in the GE |
Yossariant
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message |
15. LOL! DU looks like freerepublic. Is the Democratic Party divided? |
Tierra_y_Libertad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message |
16. No. The Clinton's have used up their assaults on my nose. |
VenusRising
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message |
|
He's a DLC'er. That right off the bat disqualifies him in my book. He's done too much covering and cleaning for the BCF. Not only do we not need to go back to Clinton policy, we have some people who need to be held responsible for eroding the Constitution, our standing in the world, and get the people some justice. We would never get any of that with Bill.
|
emilyg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message |
Hamlette
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message |
19. I would have voted for him in 2000 and in 2007 |
|
he has not done himself well this last year
|
Rageneau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message |
20. Only a wingnit wouldn't |
Armstead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message |
21. YOU SHOULD CLARIFY IF YOU MEAN PRIMARY OR GENERAL |
|
For me in the primary -- Absolutely Not
In the General against a repug -- Absolutely Yes
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 12th 2024, 08:33 AM
Response to Original message |