Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How can Hillary be better for gay rights...?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Avalon6 Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 03:31 PM
Original message
How can Hillary be better for gay rights...?
If her base depends on blue collar white voters, the very people that strongly oppose gay marriage? Think about it, her base made up of older folks, the rural working class, and gun-owning conservative democrats that oppose progressive reforms like gay marriage. Do you really think Clinton would take up an issue like gay rights that would divide her base?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think Obama should challenge her on this, just to see what she says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama should not use gay marriage
as a wedge. He hasn't run a campaign targeted at those people and he needs to, that's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalon6 Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Why not? People don't realize how fragile her base is.
She is depending on blue collar workers, who could easily turn around and vote for McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Why not use gay people as a wedge??
Gosh, I don't think you have to think hard to figure out that answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Hillary would do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Yeah I remember Hillary sending an ex gay gospel singer to fundraise for her
in NC and drum up support among her base, no wait, that wasn't her, that was Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Donnie McClurkin is a popular gospel singer, not just an "ex-gay"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. what part of gospel singer was unclear in my post?
was it gospel or singer? Yes you deserve all of that snark. I heard David Duke is a great writer, will we be seeing him sometime soon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. And Jerry Foulwell was a "popular preacher"
Would that have excused a Democratic candidate who had him stumping for him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. LOL.. Her homophobe base would fold..
That is a good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. How can gay people support someone who's on the record as strongly against gay rights?
Equal marriage is NOT a single issue. It is: common property, default medical power of attorney, visitation to hospitals and prisons, health insurance, survivor benefits, parental rights and physical, legal and financial protections should the relationship be dissolved. Federal law recognizes nearly 800 DIFFERENT rights, protections and priviledges by statute. States differ, but Washington recognizes another 800 or so. That comes to about 1600 rights that come with marriage.

And you dare tell us that all of these are irrelevant just because some blue collar bigot is "strongly opposed" to my marrying my same-sex partner?

Screw you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalon6 Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'm pretty sure she considers her base of blue collar workers more important
Since that is the only way she can win states like Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. That doesn't answer my question, does it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. there is one group of Democrats more opposed than older voters
black ones. I don't think this strategy would be terribly effective for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalon6 Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Blacks may oppose gay marriage but I doubt you will find any Fred Phelps among them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Meet Rev. Hutcherson
Edited on Sat Apr-26-08 04:05 PM by dsc
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=221&topic_id=72295&mesg_id=72295

The Rev in that thread, who wanted 1000 people to protest a high school day of silence, is black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulklogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. He also convinced many in his congregation to buy Microsoft stock and donate it to the church
so he could fight Microsoft's support of equality for GLBT Americans.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/346431_antiochmsft08.html

My God hates him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. That's a good question, isn't it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. And the answer, IMO, is she isn't better ultimately. But
responses here to questions about her approach to GLBT issues run the gamut from, "Obama's worse!" to "Obama's worse!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Not really. That 20 year history at Trinity means, for Obama,
that he supported a congregation that supported the gay community.

He never shilled for DOMA with anti-gay ads as the Clintons did.

Did his people book that idiot to make a point? Yes, they did.

But, if you honestly look at the history, his is much better.

I guess I just feel pissed that the gay community has to choose between two people who have so little to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. I agree with you. Don't get me wrong, I dislike both of these candidates.
I'm just trying (as you are) to make a fair assessment, because GLBT issues are very important to me. And so far, nobody has been able to explain precisely why Hillary is a better choice. I can only presume that's because it's unclear even to her GLBT supporters. Not exactly an encouraging sign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. No, there's nothing to be encouraged about except, maybe, maybe
that for 20 years Obama openly attended a congregation that OPENLY supported the gay community.

That's not much but, it's as much as I can find in either of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creideiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. I've tried before and it's really late right now
Maybe tomorrow I'll have the energy to try again.

In the meantime, consider this: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2007/08/gay-power.html

Start looking at voting rates by demographic and finding one with this potential turnout can really be critical in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
30. It's not possible for me to judge the outrage or frustration
at how little either candidate is committing to the GLBT community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
14. No. She leaves that to the "little gray people".
>>>Do you really think Clinton would take up an issue like gay rights that would divide her base?>>>>

i.e. her surrogates. She is ... and will countinue to be.. all things to all people: pretending to be pro-gay in the Philly gay ghetto and media, while pretending we don't exist when talking to a broader audience.

In the meantime, her GLBT surrogates savage Obama over McClurkin and the other religious koo-koos while she herself says ..............................................*nothing*.

(BTW, did you know there are no antigay RW nuts supporting Clinton?? Didya? *NONE*! Only Obama attracts these people. Oh, and see me later about a certain bridge for sale in lower Manahattan)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. You have no way to prove that the majority of blue collar white Democrats opposite gay marriage.
I'd like to see some data.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalon6 Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Here you go:
Edited on Sat Apr-26-08 04:05 PM by Avalon6
From Pew Research (http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=273):

Notice how the less educated and older demographics tend to be against gay rights (Hillary's base)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Welcome to DU!
We need more reality-based-community members here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Hillary's base is not Republican blue-collar voters.
Her base is Democratic blue-collar voters. I'd like to see the education breakdown by party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. Thanks for posting that chart...
The ONLY group to have a decrease in support of adoption is the group that supports Obama 85%+.

Who is going to have the harder sell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. Her Base Is Also Latino... They Are Most Favorably Predisposed To Gay Marriage
http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=20f41f94-d412-4b19-8655-b1412e053db9


As to working class whites, Ms. Clinton can be their Yoda on the road to their enlightenment...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 04:11 AM
Response to Original message
29. Don't worry, they realize Hillary will throw gays under the bus once given the oppurtunity
but there are other pressing issues that are bringing rural voters to Hillary and I'll give you a hint... it isn't arugula.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC